Doesn’t disenfranchisement impinge on liberty and pursuit of happiness? You also manifestly don’t understand why the Bill of Rights was created. It wasn’t the enumeration of all and only inalienable rights and the Constitution was deemed a living doc by those same smart folks :ergo the amendments listed above which you’ve ignored and probably never even read.
Pursuit of happiness doesn't mean that I have to provide happiness to them. People are welcome to seek it on their own.
If you have google, it is a thing that searches the interwebs, try this "is voting a right or a privilege".
That’s not what pursuit of happiness implies or says.
Try reading it. It’s specifically about voting. The whole amendment is about not allowing taxes to be used to prevent the right to vote. Guess what poll tax is on… seriously, you lot are pathetic about knowing your own country’s Constitution.
Dumbass.
billofrightsinstitute.org
Thank you. I stipulate to being pathetic, mindless, ignorant, and a moron. Thank you again.
Well bless your little heart.Dumbass.
Bill of Rights: The 1st Ten Amendments - Bill of Rights Institute
The Bill of Rights is a founding documents written by James Madison. It makes up the first ten amendments to the Constitution including freedom of speech and due process.
You misused the word ‘stipulate’.
Thank you, again. Thank you for making my point.
Quite back to me the first sentence of the amendment. You can’t cherry pick and thing you’re being clever. If by now you haven’t seen it then this topic is above your comprehension.
you realize you shouldn’t be the one trying to teach people here you should be the one listening, right
I am fucking moron. Thank you. Thank you for pointing that out.
That’s got to be fake just off the top of my head “vaccine” mandates didn’t apply to them. Student load debt discharge through bankruptcy only applies to their children and their aides children’s
Don’t forget opting out of Obama care and giving themselves free health insurance
Guilty until he proves himself innocent. That’s the way the yellow stream media roll.
Well at least you admit it.
Huh? So guns aren't arms?
Also I don't want to communitcate with you... its quite obvious you are a waste of time. so Bye. I am out.
The background in which the Constitution should be interpreted is from the perspective of a person/country that had just fought for its existence against a much stronger power and won.
IT only didn't specify guns because it was meant to protect our right to own everything the military has.
Who says I’m responding to him?
The pursuit of happiness was a 1980's band.
You can take the Brit out of Britain but you cant take the Britain out of the Brit.
That is an interesting take on relating quartering of soldiers to accepting, illegal immigration, which has basically become controlled human trafficking. I see the parallel you are drawing.
i know what he was saying, and it gringo, not chico ya limey bastard.
The fact they are floating the idea of forcing accomidations in “under utilized” vacation homes or in “excess” living space is exactly the type of violation the Third prohibits govt doing.
Even in the hotels they are housing them in the burnden is being placed on the taxpayer. Hotels are charging premiums and the govenment, meaning the tax payer, is the one footing the bill.
They pay the hotels and because hotel management can’t discriminate as long as the rooms are paid for they have to take them in.
First you float the idea, than you make it happen.
www.wbur.org
nypost.com
www.washingtonexaminer.com
