• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Range Report U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

ranger1183

Gunny Sergeant
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 18, 2006
3,105
14
Whitefish, MT, USA
U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/us-army-team-tests-radical-new-dimpled-bullet/

bulletdimp00.jpg


At the U.S. Army’s Aberdeen Proving Ground, a team of ballistics technicians, supported by some of the U.S. Army’s top sniper instructors, has been quietly developing a radical new “dimpled” bullet. The exterior of the bullet resembles the dimpled surface of a golf ball. The function of the special dimpled skin is to reduce projectile drag, providing a flatter long-range trajectory, and greater retained energy at the target.

.338 Projectile with MIM Exo-Jacket
(3D-CAD Artist’s Rendering)

bulletdimpanimation.gif


In their pursuit of a lower-drag bullet, the Army tried a variety of designs, including bullets with circumferential drive bands, dual-radius ogives, and rebated boat-tails. The dimpled “golf-ball” design was considered a “long shot” according to the design team, but it has performed beyond all expectations. The nominal drag coefficient (Cd) has improved by about +.040, while cartridge muzzle velocity has increased by nearly 80+ fps because the bullet’s dimpled skin reduces in-barrel friction. What’s more — the terminal performance of the dimpled bullet has been “spectacular”. The Aberdeen team set out to produce a slightly more slippery bullet for U.S. Army snipers. What they ended up with is a bullet with dramatically enhanced long-range ballistics and superior killing power on “soft targets”.

Lt. Col. Ben Eldrick, Long-Range Projectile Project (LRPP) team leader, told AccurateShooter.com how the radical bullet was conceived: “During our initial design work, we wanted the benefits of a high-BC, pointed bullet, but in a design that could be mass-produced and could work as a tracer. We consulted some of the top civilian bullet experts, including ballistician Bryan Litz of Berger Bullets. Mr. Litz really got the ball rolling. He suggested that the ‘next big step’ in bullet design would involve the turbulent boundary layer over the body of the bullet. Litz told us that ‘pointing bullet tips will take you only so far… think about optimizing the airflow over the entire bullet’. That made a lot of sense to us. When you design a race car to be aerodynamic, you sculpt the whole body, not just the front bumper.”

dimplegolf2.jpg


Lt. Col. Eldrick continued: “It turns out Litz was right on the money. By employing a golf-ball type dimpled surface, we were able to optimize the turbulent boundary layer on the bullet body. This reduced the low-pressure wake zone behind the bullet significantly, resulting in reduced base drag. As a result the bullet experiences much less overall drag, effectively raising the BC.” The Army team had discovered that what works for golf balls also works for bullets.

bulletdimp250j4.jpg


After testing a series of prototypes, the Aberdeen bullet design team settled on a copper-jacketed bullet with dimples about 0.5 mm in diameter. The first-generation bullets were formed in special binary impact swages that press-form the dimples after the bullets were pointed up in conventional dies. Future production bullets will be made with an advanced metal-injection-molding (MIM) process that forms the dimples directly into the surface of the bullets. Rather than simply wrap the core material (which is classified), the MIM is molecularly bonded to the core. The Aberdeen LRPP team calls this “Exo-Jacket” construction, as in “Exo-Skeleton”.

<span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-weight: bold">Higher Velocities Achieved</span></span>

There was a surprise benefit of the dimpled bullet design — higher muzzle velocities. Given the same powder charge, dimpled bullets exit the muzzle faster because they produce less in-barrel friction than do conventional bullets. This is because the recessed dimples effectively reduce the metal-on-metal bearing surface. Lt. Col. Eldrick revealed: “the added velocity was an unexpected bonus. With equal-pressure loads, dimpled .308 bullets will fly about 80 fps faster than normal .308 bullets. With the large .338-caliber projectiles, the difference is even greater… we can pick up nearly 150 fps.” Given the observed velocity gains achieved with dimpled bullets, Aberdeen designers are now working on dimpled shell casings for larger artillery projectiles.

bulletdimpdoppler.jpg


<span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-weight: bold">Dimpled Jacket Delivers ‘Explosive’ Fragmentation</span></span>

While the internal design and core materials of the new dimpled bullet remain classified, the design team revealed that the terminal performance of the new bullet has been “spectacular”. The bullet penetrates like a FMJ but then explosively fragments, resulting in a devastating energy release in the target. According to Capt. Jack Sarazen, an Aberdeen engineer, “the enhanced terminal performance of the dimpled bullet was unanticipated. This was a serendipitous effect of the slight thinning of the jacket material where the dimples are pressed.” Sarazen explained: “Most FMJ bullets break along the cannelure and then fragment into two or three large pieces. With the dimpled bullets, you have multiple fragmentation points so the bullet literally blows up like a grenade in the target.”

 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet



Brain's the MAN....
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Harold Dale</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So simle,yet so complex! Why didn't I think of that! </div></div>


Because conventional wisdom has told us that smooth is better, which is obvisually incorrect.
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

Oh God! I'm showing my ass again!

Heck, I'm just going to walk back to the farm and harvest my Spaghetti tree.

<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SyUvNnmFtgI"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SyUvNnmFtgI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

Damnit you got me all worked up!!! This is an actual question I asked a bullet designer!!!
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

Well, if dimples are great,then maybe a tear drop shape bullet. The old Salt Flat Bonnevine Racers found that the perfect air dymaics shape is a fallinf rain drop. Let's see, a dimpled ,rain teardrop bullet. We know the fundumentals,but now is the question of how to make it work in the real world.
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

I always wondered how golf balls flew so fucken far when cracked a good shot...Those suckers pack a ton of energy too, ever see one go through a car window??
crazy.gif
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

I work for a small custom firearm manufacturer in CT and we actually have tried the same theory out. Craig at Aqua Blast who performs alot of the shotpeening for Colt etc. came up with the idea and we "dimpled" some Lost River Ballistic 190 gr. and some Sierra and Berger 175's. The dimpling was much finer than that depicted in the computer simulation but it did increase the velocity. Can't speak for the accuracy since we only did small batches.
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

Actually, the teardrop shape is a good one for subsonic applications.

Unfortunately, the long pointy tail tends to mess with internal case capacity.

Chopping the tail off to a boattail configuration, combined with a round nose, actually works very well for subsonics.

Greg
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

My electronics guy can't tell whether those devices with the RF coax attached are really Doppler Radar, but he won't buy anything posted on April first.

I'm waiting for Bryan Litz to comment on this.

Bryan???
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

I have not looked at boundary layer theory since school, but just off the top of my head I would think if the dimples are deeper than the boundary layer (which would be very thin) the edges of these dimples on the spinning projectile could cause shock reflections in supersonic flow. These typically increase drag way over what is seen with a smooth bullet. Now if this was for an optimized sub-sonic bullet....they may actually decrease drag.
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

I didn't quite believe it when I read it. It would seem that if you did do this to a bullet the projectile would have way more drag, but I'm no physics expert. For example, if you made a car body with a golf ball design, the air would fill the dimples pressing on the walls creating a lot more drag!

Now, while I was working one day I had a very interesting idea for a bullet design that I believe could possibly work very well with some good R&D! Oh, how I would love to try out my idea! Don't feel like giving it away at the moment, but I'm sure someone somewhere has thought of the same idea as I.
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: StealthWarrior</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I didn't quite believe it when I read it.</div></div>

Read it a couple more times, then. Maybe your instincts will manage to throttle your brain into submission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools_Day
 
Re: U.S. Army Team Tests Radical New Dimpled Bullet

Your right, I just need to admit that it is real. Haha!