Re: What is the best caliber for ELR in aSHORT ACTION?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bohem</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: D_TROS</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bohem</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
<span style="font-weight: bold">Don't believe the BC that JLK's publishing.</span>
</div></div>
Would you care to share any data that points otherwise?
After the 300 gr BC tests recently completed, I am very wary of believing anything that berger publishes either.
Not hating on your opinion, just wonder if you actually have any hard data or you dont like the way the JLK's shoot in your rifle?
I am quite excited about the JLK's, but if its negligable to the Berger, I would rather go with the bullet I could hunt with as well.
Thanks,
DT </div></div>
Yep, we have <span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-weight: bold">data that Litz published</span> </span>in both editions of his book as well as on his website.
They shoot GREAT in my rifles and they're an excellent bullet overall, but if someone is going to spec a build based on the idea that they're going to a 180gr pill with a .735BC from JLK that's not a reality.
The BC's listed on JLK's website are static calculations, not tested G1's.
</div></div>
I also have that book, I was unaware they tested JLK's bullet. I will have to check that out again tonight. And even if it is not that high, it is $0.06 cheaper per bullet. That is $60 worth of savings per 1k bullets. That by itself is enough to get them in my book.
Are the BC's of the JLK's not as high as published? I would be very very surprised if they were, but I dont know. Thats why I asked if you had any hard data.
And a problem with a company testing their own bullet, which was just proven with the 338 cal bullet test, is companies tend to favor on the side of positive results with their data. And that is the reason i am still VERY WARY of bergers test data. Only the sierras tested close to actual published data. VERY significant if you ask me.
Regards,
DT
Regards,
DT