Latest activity

DarnYankeeUSMC · May 16, 2025

86 has always meant to shit can or throw away to me and those that used it.
Comey is a lawyer and a top notch word smith. Whatever his intentions were are only known to him. It's use was skirting the edge allowing him to get away with it.
I predict that after a long investigation the results will be a waste of time. Results will be....." No reasonable prosecutor would bring charges".
In other words. It's just another distraction to keep the people pitted against each other instead of focusing on their government fucking them royally.

All The World Is A Stage. You are being played

poke_53 · May 16, 2025

godofthunder said:
M-Brace is 0 MOA
$250 for M Brace

What are the specs on the mount?

502Chevelle · May 16, 2025

No reason not to dial in that situation. Just don't forget to put it back before your next session. Of course you wonder what dumb asswould do something like that. No further comments needed.

Hecouldgoalltheway · May 16, 2025

So now we aren't pro 1st ammendment here on SH? We think the government should prosecute people for talking shit? Let's hurry up and set that precedent before AOC becomes president. Things move fast around here..

Dirty D · May 16, 2025

lash · May 16, 2025

ironpony52 said:
Very sloppy miters

I felt bad about that one. Here, is this any better?

TacticalPlinker · May 16, 2025

carbonbased said:
in the Midas there’s not much over-travel available (I like over-travel)

I totally agree. I tried to increase the overtravel but it's not built into the design. But once you are at peace with the Midas , you become one with the Midas.
~ Sun Tzu

Z06pilot · May 16, 2025

Pnwclark said:
Any interest in a trade for a mk4HD ?

Pm sent

Big joe · May 16, 2025

Anyone on here a member of Kettlefoot Gun club in Bristol VA?

Hecouldgoalltheway · May 16, 2025

JR1200W3 said:
Is that why we want Greenland? Because there's no threat?

Extestential threat is not why we get sucked into wars. It's our position as a leading Nation and what we think our responsibility to the rest of the world is. That was Reagan's mindset and we got sucked into Beirut. That's why all the sudden we're mediating between Pakistan and India now. That's why we got sucked into Vietnam. That's why we got sucked into helping South Korea. That's how we got into the first Gulf war. It's our self-image as a free Western society. That and a competition for global resources. And by extension competition for a strategic position for future resources that we have yet to identify. And it's absolutely the current administrations mindset on attempting to meditate/ assist in UKR right now. That's why the deal we struck was based on minerals.

What you are saying is not true. It's just rhetoric.

You should listen to that book by Jack Carr about Beirut. Just for starters. It's on audiobooks and it's a decent listen

No sir, nothing I said is rhetoric.

I don't want to get off topic here, so I'll make it quick.

In a single sentence, please write an explanation for our involvement in each of these situations:

1. The Korean war
2. The Vietnam War
3. Desert storm
4. OIF
5. OEF

It's the cold war, the red scare, nuclear proliferation, the spread of communism, the threat of chemical warfare, the scary Muslims, now the Chinese standing army, the Iranian threat, bla bla bla. It's all bullshit, every single one of them. We ran out of credible enemies after WW2, but the war supply economy made us the foremost superpower in the world, so in absence of a credible threat, agents within the government combined with private sector agitators have continually fed the American people paper tigers as credible threats to keep the trillions flowing to the mic companies. This is a fact. A short study of history will quickly prove that the number one perpetrator of attacks that launch America into wars are carried out by America, or facilitated by in some cases, or allowed to happen at a minimum. Money is the driving factor for everything, and nothing makes more money than war.

Edited to add: our military should absolutely be ready and capable of defeating the might of the Chinese military, and we are, but they should stay domestic, and stop meddling in everyone else's business, and it won't happen. People start starving to death in China within a month of developed nations refusing to continue to buy their cheap bullshit products. They can't afford to wage war, and their citizens would be next to useless in a large scale conflict.

Big joe · May 16, 2025

Are you a member at Kettlefoot? I moved to Kingsport 3 years ago. I work in W KY

CSTactical · May 16, 2025

sandhiller · May 16, 2025

Just me and Django releasing endorphins

Big joe · May 16, 2025

I’d say 1000 especially if I Can get into local club that has 1000 yard range. But if I can’t I’d say I’d shoot 5-6 times a year, where we just shot and I’d shoot both 1000 and a mile

lash · May 16, 2025

ironpony52 said:
Very sloppy miters

Totally agree, plus pin nailed together.

Mortised mitre joints would look and work great for this.

Hecouldgoalltheway · May 16, 2025

tikka_rfn said:
NX8 is a $3000(€2680) scope where I am, and a Razor gen ii is $3350(€3000), didnt even do a price check on a Gen iii Razor, so short of winning the lotto never going to be an option for me.

I know nobody that would even have one for me to look through to see how much better they are than what I've ever owned.

There's nothing wrong with the nx8, other than a really tight eyebox, but nightforce glass just isn't that great at any level. I've never looked through a beast, so they might be great, but the rest of them..... not great glass comparatively in their price range. They prioritize durability, not glass quality, and they are very successful. It's not a criticism of their products, just a very common opinion that I also happen to have.

On another note, I prioritize a small floating center dot for centerfire rifles. The ranges are short and the targets are often small. The smaller illuminated dot is key to making precise shots at close range. If I was building a rifle for rabbit hunting, I'd mount a 1-10x lpvo.

Bigjake83 · May 16, 2025

WeR0206 said:
Thanks for the feedback. Its good to hear the other end of the spectrum re their cust service. I think ill grab one of the 3-18, at $580 that’s an insane deal for the features, glass, etc….its like athlon helos btr price but with way better glass etc

When you get it come back on here and relay your opinions. I think a lot of people are gun shy to make the purchase or just Scope Snobs, but everyone I know who has purchased one has been extremely satisfied.

Sean the Nailer · May 16, 2025

Take it from a person who has a boat, and I live on it quite a bit through the summer (literally and littorally), it is a lifestyle in itself. But my suggestion to you would be to go the less expensive route, and :

Build your own single-seat helicopter. That way you can save money and do all the maintenance on your own, for yourself. See, saves you money and look at the fun you'll have.

BroncoVol74 · May 16, 2025

ecowboy said:
Which LRF binos did you use with this watch? Is making a target card an easy process?

Sig Kilos. Yes. I use it for NRL. Simple as can be.

MikeMiller · May 16, 2025

Secant said:
My point being that I understand very limited # of the Fury ABs will be sold looking into the future, so I can appreciate why AB would not want to take the time to support that platform. Even though I would image there are more than a few on the market and I think many/most owners would appreciate the simplicity of managing fewer apps across the board.

Also, I have no insight, but have heard the anticipated BLRFs from Vortex will (hopefully) include Razor glass. I would expect that the new Geoballistic BLRF would/could cost more than the Fury 5000 if that's the case.

Well I have no dog in the fight between Vortex and AB. With AB no longer supporting Vortex products except this. When I received my Vortex products with AB in them they were legally licensed through AB. Now that Vortex has purchased Geo Ballistics AB has decided to not support the previously purchased AB licensed Vortex products. I believe AB should support every product they licensed period.

That screws the consumer who purchased the AB licensed products not Vortex. Vortex still supports their part of the product but AB won’t. AB was paid then decided not to support anything they licensed through Vortex

So guess what I won’t purchase another AB product. I will get something else. That’s not a big deal to AB but I am sure others feel the same as I do. Money put out with promise to keep up to date but AB decided to stop.

I have been using an Impact 4000 with Geo Ballistics in it. It works well enough that it consistently gives first round hits up to a mile with the 300WM and 6.5 Creedmoor I use it on

Plus Geo Ballistics will continue to update as new bullets come out

FatBoy · May 16, 2025

Trigger Monkey said:
45-degree Offset

View attachment 8686707
Pros: Easy to acquire by rolling the rifle over.
Inline with the bore and basically at a co-witness height so I can use whatever zero scheme I want.

Cons: It's awkward to use from the support side.
Mounts take up rail space.
I have to take extra shit with me to support the gun while it's canted at an angle to zero.
My situational awareness sucks with larger optics because when the gun is rolled over the optic blocks my field of view.
What ends up happening is that my brain then sends all the signals to my right eye so I end up seeing through a tube with a dot in the
middle surrounded by black. That sucks transitioning from target to target, but hey sweet cheek weld.

12:00 mounting location:

View attachment 8686715
Pros: Easy to zero, I can just stay in position with the same bipod and rear bag and zero at 100 same as the optic.
The optic is no longer blocked by the scope so when in use I have increased SA going from target to target.
I can use the optic from the dominant or support side without much issue.
I can see the dot just over the elevation turret so it's not really a chin weld with the cheek riser, I basically lift my head and there's the dot.
Deconflicts rail space for accessories like dope card holders, brass catchers, levels, etc...

Cons: Taller profile. This can get in the way depending on the situation but so can the 45 offset.
Limited options for quality stand alone mounts unless going with a new mount that has the option to swap turrets.

Those are just some of my experiences in experimenting with the two set ups over the past year.

^^ This shouldn’t be a sticky…

All this talk about transitions time. How much are you guys transitioning? I think the 2 gun matches with with Throoms (2 or 3” lollipops inside 20 yards) is probably the most I transition in a stage. Otherwise, AC zone reduced and larger targets 100 and in is red dot. Small targets and 100+ yards is LPVO (except throoms) . There’s not a ton of transition for me.

That said, when I start a stage with something close and I use LPVO for HOB holds I generally stay in the scope. This slows me WAY down when I have to find targets unless I’m shooting an ACOG. But me last two gun and I ended up starting in the middle of a 3 gong array. Had the scores not took pity on me after a 12 second magazine debacle I would have got a +30 for failure to engage.

Personally I like the 90*, mainly for VTAC lists and support side. Tried them both and went with what better for the type of shooting I do.

Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter