Latest activity

Hot Threads

Latest activity

 Posts Forum list
 

Filter

House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

Longshot231
doubloon said:
You keep saying this but a lot of things get registered without paying a tax.

In order for registration to be off the table suppressors, SB-thing, etc. would have to be removed from the NFA and that's what HPA/SHORT did, made them regular firearms so a 4473 would still be required for all of them.

Leaving them in the NFA but reducing the tax to $0 leaves registration in tact.



I saw the post.

Opinions are not laws.

Testimony is not law.

The NFA is law.

I'd like to be wrong, I hope I'm wrong, I hope all works out the way you want to describe it but nothing I read backs up what you're claiming.

We and A.G. Cummings can be butt hurt all we want about getting screwed over by a bad law but it doesn't change the fact that it's a law. Unless suppressors and other toys are removed from the NFA registration is still a requirement tax or no tax. Again, I hope I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
A lot of things do get registered without paying a tax. However, we're not talking about those things.

FDR & co. got around banning by charging a HUGE tax on those devices. That's how they got away with it for so long. IMHO, that's still a flimsy excuse because no other rights recognized in the BOR are taxed.
Click to expand...

Sumac has entered the chat

D
Your application rate is way to weak. Mix 50oz of glyphosate with 40oz of 24d with 40oz of ammonium sulfate spray grade (AMS) in your sprayer. Not sure how big your sprayer tank is but you are going to want 15 gallons of water minimum per acre.

You could also use Garlon here is a generic

Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: PinesAndProjectiles

Suppressor with a brake on it, does it help or not?

Hecouldgoalltheway
Zak Smith said:
A lot. In this graph the RR models have the brake on the end.

rr_vs_db.png




ETA: Also, the Ultra50 recoil reduction compared to a bare muzzle on 50BMG is 65% reduction.
Click to expand...
I'm really confused as I study this graph. I'll pick an example, please help me understand..

The first example is a (magnus S RR (with brake as I understand it)). It shows a 65% recoil reduction.

Same suppressor, no brake reduces recoil 15%?

So, unless im reading it wrong, it claims that the brake under the can offers you a 433% recoil reduction vs the can alone? That's just not true.

Am I reading this wrong?
Click to expand...

House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

lash
doubloon said:
There was with the HPA and SHORT as "amendments" to the bill. Those are what got struck by the parliamentarian. (I think)

There has always been two moving pieces to the NFA stuff.

1) The original verbiage in the actual bill which only dropped the tax down to $0 and only on suppressor "transfers" but didn't change registration. The original words only specified "transfers".

2) The HPA and SHORT amendments to the bill which dropped suppressors, SB-things, etc. from NFA. Arguably a better deal than a $0 tax with no registration but it was MORE than JUST a tax change. It was a regulation change and probably why it was struck unchallenged.

This new bill verbiage, assuming all the links I followed are true, accurate and up to date goes back to the original IN THE BILL text that dropped suppressor taxes down to $0 but kept registration and now includes SB-things, etc. in the $0 tax change which is just a tax change and not a regulation change. And it includes "making" not just "transfers".
Click to expand...
Ah, that does track now that I think about it it.
Click to expand...

Finding a wife

M
W54/XM-388 said:
HUGE mistake (repeat this in signature Trumpish voice).

Western men see these types and think they get their wet dream of a meek submissive woman who will do anything they ask and such.
If you know more about the culture there and the actual women, you'd understand they all see men as essentially beasts of burden and paychecks that they can milk for everything they can to support not just themselves but an entire family of them.

Also most forget that in many of those countries, when it comes to actual domestic stuff, the women essentially bully the men into doing what they want, regardless of the outward appearances.

Also remember they are interested in marrying you for your money and for a visa.
The moment they get their hands on those, you are nothing but a pay pig.
Click to expand...
this is right in my limited exposure. i know about 6 guys of my age,60s-70s, who brought women back from VN,Thailand,Philippines. they all got nailed to a cross. from Russia 50/50. what i saw from my fathers ww2 gen they all had exc marriages. i am thinking a gen thing not cultural. limited samples,so?
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Herb Stoner

Maggie’s Funny & awesome pics, vids and memes thread (work safe, no nudity)

LeftyJason
Maser said:
Talent or too much Adderall?

Login to view embedded media
Click to expand...
Pretty sure it looks Ai. The physics of the head spins of hoodie look wrong. You wouldn't be doing those kinds of moves by either one directly on concrete. Their spin physics looked too smooth as well.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: geek65, Eddystone and ZY100

House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

Longshot231
doubloon said:
2) The HPA and SHORT amendments to the bill which dropped suppressors, SB-things, etc. from NFA. Arguably a better deal than a $0 tax but it was MORE than JUST a tax change. It was a regulation change.
Click to expand...
The reason that registration existed in the first place was because it assured that the tax had been paid. If there is no tax there is no need for registration.

Also think about this: If they can get the registration language to stick, what prevents them from adding other firearms to the list of weapons that must be registered? The precedent is set.

No taxation but you have registration. They will argue, "You won't have to pay a tax on the guns you already own and we're not banning them. All we want you to do is register them." BOHICA!

Go back and read post #289 if you haven't already.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r and XP1K
Load more
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts