Surely someone needs a tac driving Gas gun!!
Will post better high res pics tomorrow!

Pharmseller said:

What does “Extroardinary” mean?



P

Click to expand...

Dino themed extraordinary. ExtROARdinary.

TTT

Ok I got to the range today. The barrel shot good. The pictures are a 3" circle at 100 yds shooting hornady black 2975 fps. So in the end the barrel will work for what I want which is a night time coyotes.

TTT

TTT

akmike47 said:

View attachment 8703387

Click to expand...

Well, since it’s this thread, I should answer something to the effect that your mama is so big…

But actually it’s something my 10 yo grandson drew using MS Paint. It depicts an imaginary monster that fits into a fun card game we’ve played called Monsdrawsity.

But the resemblance to your momma is remarkable….

We have some of the 410s if anyone needs them.


Kent

DairyDictator said:

ARC has been pretty weak in my experience. Mine and a buddy's MBrace mounts cracked and broke right at the hinge with no major impacts. My going theory is cold temps caused it. The LRF bridge is tough as hell but the rings, not so much.

Click to expand...

I've heard a couple reports of this, but haven't seen any pictures-- and I'd love to see some if you have them. It's fairly obvious the expected failure point of the ARC design would occur in hinge pins themselves or in the "fingers" for the hinge pins in the base or rings caps. I have yet to have any failures in my sample size (10 mounts and 1 set of rings.) Not saying the ARC design can't fail, but they appear to be failing at a far lower rate than say scalarworks where you can easily find lots of pictures of broken ring hinges. If I had one of my ARCs fail I'd switch brands again, just like I did with Spuhr, only this time I'm not waiting until I have a 45% failure rate to change brands, lol

How cold was it when you had the failures? Several of my M-brace mounts have seen lots of use and bouncing around on quads and side by sides with heavy razor gen 3s and S&B 5-25s down in the 15-30f range for a couple years now with no issues, but that's not as cold as is it gets elsewhere...

I suppose if I really wanted to torture test them I could stick them in a thermal chamber here at work... they'll go down to -321F, but that's a bit excessive, lol.

oldrifleman said:

How does it shoot?

Click to expand...

Stupid good. Very noticeable difference running it without and with the brake.

No POI shift shooting 3 “different” lots of ammo.

I can’t freely run cans like @hic28 can in CA. But everytime I slap one on

232593 said:

Nor does any of your gibberish.

Click to expand...

Post some other nonsense- Rooskie this... Immigration that... OH, LOOK! A SQUIRREL!!

Anything to run from the Truth.

C130 said:

Question regarding the Hodgdon loading data. I entered 140g bullet and it gives a max load of 40.0gr. I'm using 1x fired Hornady brass for the time being as I had over 1500 pieces. Most of the load data I found was using over 41 grains, I have been using 41.2 for the last couple hundred rounds. The data Hodgdon gives seems low or am I most likely using too much powder. I'm averaging about 2805fps with a suppressor (less without) and nice grouping so pretty happy with the results. But, I'm new to reloading so lots to learn. Using H4350 and Berger 140g hybrid target.

Click to expand...

So most reloading data from a manufacturer is going to be conservative for legal reasons.

Hodgdon's listed max 40.0gr load is also listed 59.2K PSI, or about 3K less than max SAAMI pressure (and many people will go over that by a bit and still not see pressure).

As long as you aren't seeing ejector marks, smears and otherwise damage to your brass, I think that 41.2 is fine.

Which 18650 is everyone using with these? Flat top or button top? Discharge rate, mah?

RIGREG said:

@Jeremy69





(Credit to usmcweaponry.com for the above picture. I think @cplnorton runs it. I’ll delete if it’s an infringement)
If you haven’t already, go check it out.

Click to expand...

I don't run it. It's actually a guy name Tim Plowman who does. He just has a lot of my pictures and research posted on there.

As far as my vote Jeremy, I would have both.

Friday

akmike47 said:

Yeah you and your daughter are going to whore on here, great story bro.
View attachment 8703364

Y’all are some gullible full blown retards helping some guy with his cuck fantasies.

“My husband and I have been away from the forum for a while so just reintroducing ourselves” How do you “reintroduce” yourself when you signed up October 2024, never posted and show back up last Tuesday?

About this image

www.google.com

Been using the same bs story for 2 years and been banned from other forums

Click to expand...

Your skepticism is why she's meeting me and not you at the truck stop on route 7 on the 4th of July @2am.

The turret is in mils even if S&B labeled it 1 click = 1 cm @ 100M (yay base 10 units of measurement) so it will be much easier to calculate all your data in mils and not bring inches of drop into things.

As far as why you hit at 200 and didn't make it at 300 I'm thinking you didn't snug the setscrews on the turret tight enough after zeroing and the turret slipped when dialing to 300, but even then you should have only hit low and still made it onto a 36 x 36 target. Did you try dialing back down and shooting again at 200 and 100 to see if it dialed back to zero properly?

I doubt that the scope is out of elevation adjustment (doubtful even on a 0MOA rail as the 3-18 has 30.5 mils of elevation travel which should be plenty.)

I'd verify zero and resnug the elevation turret screws first, and you may want to lock the rifle down and dial a tracking test on a tall target to see if the scope is tracking properly.