Maggie’s The Woodchuck and Firewood Hoarders Thread
- By Lawless
- The Bear Pit
- 3391 Replies
Took out a few trees today, just 10-12” maple and some smaller stuff. Showed my SIL the basics. I will let him do some soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Use code FRIDAY25 and SATURDAY25 to get 25% off access to Frank’s online training. Want a better deal? Subscribe to get 50% off.
Get Access SubscribeLeupold did for years on many models. It sucked. Mark ar 3-9x40 sfp mil reticle moa elevation and iphy windage. Gave to my FIL on a non dialing 22lr to replace a broken tasco.If only someone would make a scope like my favorite tape measure, with a MIL reticle and MOA turrets then we would have the best of both worlds. View attachment 8735975
I feel the same way about my Glocks![]()
I hadn't heard that news. Where did you hear this?I've never seen it for noticeably less. Last I read about IMI is there will be no more shipments to USA in the near future.
You really didn't give us much to work with such as powder, velocity, or charge weight so its anyones guess as to what is going on. But If you have a powder measure that's good to +/-0.1gr with most powders in 223 that's about 24 fps ES for velocity. That is somewhere between a 4 and a 5.1 fps standard deviation assuming you have good case fill and appropriate primer. If your 30ish SD is correct it's not likely to be charge weight driven. If it is charge weight driven then it's likely a function of case fill or neck tension. Not knowing what COAL you are using I can't comment beyond if you are much beyond 2.26" with this bullets I thing you might look at that. I would look at your case fill and get it up to about 95% or better with the powder that will yield that and be below pressure issues.I have a Tikka 595 in 223 Remington, my current barrel is a 1:12 Hart using 52-53 grain flat base Berger or Sierra bullets.
I shoot a club match each week requiring 50 rounds, generally I would use RE-15 or N203B and get excellent accuracy.
To speed things up in the loading area, I tried a couple ball powders that I could dump load with a Harrell’s powder measure, W748 and H335. They both meter fine, but my SD’s and ES’s are huge, SD’s 30+ and ES 115+. Accuracy is just aok, but inconsistent. Sometimes I can clean a target, other times it looks like a gathering not a group. I’ve been through different bullets, seating depth changes, primers, powder weight changes and nothing seems to work. I should say I need better than 1/2 MOA in this game, if woodchucks were the quarry, these loads would be fine.
Before I go back to stick powders, are there any Ball powders or one that meters easily that rival accuracy of stick powders?
Thanks for any insight.
I love how consistent you are.They got a pretty neat thread over at RimfireCentral about this fellow rebuilding his little Gibson tractor.
Thanks, Dude, the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.There are two very capable people in this discussion that can do both of those things and produce a FINE product, and working together, could imho, take the rimfire world by storm, and put the old best in the dust box. Again, jmho that M & D could do this.
And there is a 3rd party that has experience in setting up stuff from scratch that could participate, set those two up, and sit at the pool drinking mai-tai's smiling at the new 22lr super rifle...
But, would/will he consider this, having seen the serpent b4. Just thinking out loud, dangerous, dangerous...
I think I shall go wax my![]()