Maggie’s Funny & awesome pics, vids and memes thread (work safe, no nudity)
- By Maggot
- The Bear Pit
- 113454 Replies
I saw the 1752 in a museum somewhere, years ago. How he did that is unbelievable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw the 1752 in a museum somewhere, years ago. How he did that is unbelievable
I said that I believe you, it was the other character that questioned it![]()
I suppose that’s the part where I am supposed to go “I told you so” to Richard, right?
it is still out there.
Exactly.2200 yards at game is nothing short of retarded.
There is a 2203yd target at spearpoint in KS. It’s 36” square. The match results are easy to look up if you’ve never shot there. The people shooting this are using all the data and have plenty of time. It’s missed way more often than it’s hit. And that’s not even cold bore! Most matches they’re shooting a 2073yd target right before and just slightly below the 2203.
I have a 66% ipsc in my target array at 700yd. The amount of times people miss that thing is very telling of people capability. I shoot with some pretty good shooters too.
Misleading. Some were dropped, but he's still charged with a bunch.
pedestrians have left the chat…You already know he drove a Mustang… let me spell it out for you “S P E C I A L”![]()
If you are really asking me: I regard anything any politician says about a potential enemy as 'maybe'. Bibi and lots of others have been ringing the Iran bomb bell for decades. What was in it for Bibi to bring this to a head now? Trial? Was 10/7 real? Or was that about the same?If they don't believe that Iran has stockpiles of highly enriched Uranium then why did Bibi say they did and were only weeks to months away from enriching it to weapons grade and had enough to refine it into a weapon?
I have already addressed the 83.7% PARTICLES issue earlier this week.
What I am NOT saying is that Iran is innocent. What I am saying is that the narrative is all over the map. And if Iran did/does have it I dont think they are so stupid as to leave it in one location. That would be next level moronic. So if they have it, my bet is that it is still out there.
OCM5 for sure. It's pretty much the standard for precision AR as far I'm concerned.Otter Creek Labs Polonium 556 or OCM-5...
Also, increased legitimate supply will probably drive down prices, hurting the Russian economy as it is mainly oil based.
Wheels inside of wheels…….
Affordable is pretty vague, leave a lot to interpretation.Thought the 870 was a pump? M4 cost to much and the parts you want are hard to source, not dealing with all that BS.
If they don't believe that Iran has stockpiles of highly enriched Uranium then why did Bibi say they did and were only weeks to months away from enriching it to weapons grade and had enough to refine it into a weapon?Tehran has increasingly limited the IAEA’s ability to inspect its facilities since Washington withdrew from the nuclear deal, though it pledged in March 2023 to boost cooperation with the agency. The commitment came months after IAEA inspectors detected uranium particles enriched to 83.7 percent at Fordow, prompting international concern.
The CFR (of all groups) is clear in their synopsis - no one believes Iran has stockpiles of highly enriched uranium.