sirhrmechanic said:

View attachment 8674989

Click to expand...

Sendero_Man said:

Personally, I'd buy the new Seekins PH3 NRL in 6.5 CM. You'll be very happy with it !!

Click to expand...

MWAlex2 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Nik H said:

General Incompetence is in charge.

Click to expand...

theLBC said:

rip

Click to expand...

VikingSinEater said:

I can say beyond a doubt that the contrast on an 840 doesn't suck... I have one and have looked down TTs at the range and they are VERY close, maybe a smidge better for the TT. But that photo they show does NOT represent the glass in a ZCO well at all. I don't know what happened but that contrast doesn't look great in that photo, however shooting a couple thousand rounds down one in various conditions (including rain, snow, at Dawn and dusk) to my eye I was able to pick out any target no matter how battered and worn against similar colored backgrounds, something that was far more difficult in my NF 5-25 ATACR. Also I do have a newer ZCO (got it a year ago). Take it for what it is from my opinion, it's just that an opinion.

Click to expand...

stanley_white said:

“For my eyes and in the context of a PRS match, X Scope works better than Y Scope for Reasons 1, 2, and 3,” is not throwing shade and I submit many here would welcome a more brand-specific comparison.

Now, if it’s more like “PRS people and online trolls are weak minded and will react unfavorably to even the smallest perceived criticism of their favorite optic, this will cause needless stress in my life, thus I shall refrain from comparing specific brands,” well, I think we all understand that.

-Stan

Click to expand...