• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

Filter

Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

Alright, it’s time for our first Quick Shot Challenge!

CAPTION THIS:
View attachment 8681416

Drop it in the replies below and we’ll pick a winner!

Prize:
One Hide T-shirt—shipped free to the winner.

Only subscribers are eligible to win, but everyone is welcome to post and get in on the fun!

Entries close in 48 hours. We’ll announce the winner shortly after in this thread.

Supporters, this is your chance to score some gear just for showing up! For everyone else, consider subscribing here if you’d like a chance to win.

Good luck everyone!

Plane crash At Reagan National

Quite possible. Another point that has been made is the they were flying with "NVGs". This I find doubtful because "PAT" army Black Hawks are an elite unit and should be state of the art aircraft. PAT stands for "Priority Air Transport". They are mainly used to transport VIPs and high ranking officers. The crews are select top notch aviators.

Below is an image of one of these helicopters, known as "Gold Tops" (for the paint scheme). You can see a FLIR pod under the chin of the aircraft. That is an incredible and very sophisticated vision system that would negate the use of night vision goggles. The images are displayed on the control panel....

View attachment 8682210
I used to fly fixed wing air ambulance equipped with FLIR and we almost never used it. They’re fine for recon but it’s not something you’d want to use to aviate.

Suppressors Best way to clean heavily fouled TBAC can ?

Did this to my 338 Gen 2 a couple months back after sending in my Ultra 9 to be cleaned and 30P1 to be recored, CLR soak for 24 hours and pressure washed it. Didn't use the Boretech wand, just a simple pressure washer gun I use to wash my cars with. Did run my borescope down the suppressor and it does get the vast majority of the carbon out, down to the metal.

1746734127204.jpeg
1746734104854.jpeg


TBAC cleaned Ultra 9 on the left, Recored 30P1 on the right. It's a huge difference IMO

1746734306220.jpeg
  • Like
Reactions: carbonbased

Finding a wife

I didn't realize mentioning no sex outside of marriage would get you quite so worked up.

If you read the Bible, both the old and new Testaments, you will see that there is actually a fair bit of a difference in how serious a sin is and a difference between sins and transgressions.

I'll dare say that even you consider some crimes (which are sins in God's eyes) to be worse than others. It's doubtful you would honestly say that all crimes that someone does are equal. (Sins could be essentially explained to someone not familiar with religion as willfully disobeying the laws of God).

Both the laws of Moses and also the writings of various leaders in the New Testament do in fact make a distinction that some sins are more serious than others, especially if you cause harm to others or violate sacred covenants you have made.
Jesus Christ put paid to that as well when He clearly states that all sins can be forgiven, except 1 specific sin.

Nobody in our Church is perfect, we all make mistakes, we probably all from time to time have transgressions, perhaps sometimes even sins.
But we try our best to do what would make Heavenly Father happy and repent and rely on the forgiveness of Jesus Christ when we fail to do as we should.

That being said it's an ancient heresy that because you are forgiven you can go on willfully sinning as much as you want and continuing in your sins without repenting of them, and have no consequences ever.

In our Church, unlike many others, we do take the Commandments in both the Old and New Testament regarding not having sex outside marriage seriously. We make sacred covenants with God to obey Commandments such as being faithful to Jesus Christ and also keeping the law of Chasity. Willfully violating sacred covenants and promises you made with God is a bit more of a matter than many other transgressions or sins.

That we are asked about it from time to time, should come as no surprise to anyone.

We here now, are on a forum about guns, well anytime you go buy a gun from an FFL, you willingly fill out a questionnaire from the Federal Government asking if you have obeyed and kept certain laws even if many of us think those are stupid.
You willingly sign and certify under penalty for lying that you have kept the various laws of the government.

You'll find many the "good folks" not very happy on here if you lie about it, just look at how many folks condemned Hunter Biden for lying on that form and doing something the government said he shouldn't.

The Bishop of our congregation is one of the kindest, most selfless, most loving and caring and compassionate person you will ever meet.
But he can't excuse willful violations of sacred covenants that you do not repent of and sincerely change your ways.

Let me ask you a question:
If one of your children or grandchildren or similar went to go play at a friend's house and came back and told you that said friend wanted them to do drugs together or wanted them to go drinking or stealing or looking at pornography together, would you let your child/grandchild/etc go back to that same house to go play with that same person?

If any of your friends were asking if it's fine to send their children/grandchildren/etc over to xxx house to play with xxx would you encourage them to do so, or would you say nothing, or would you warn them that they shouldn't let their children be associated with that person until the issue is resolved and the behaviour/situation corrected?

Don't many parents/grandparents and others warn their children/grandchildren/others that if a "friend" offers or entices you to do things such as listed above, they should leave immediately and report back to the parents and not associate with that other child until further notice?

In our Church we take the law of Chastity very seriously, it is a Sacred Covenant we make with God, specifically that we don't have sexual relations with another person outside of a marriage (that is proper in the laws of God, regardless of if the laws of the land allow marriages that are against the laws of God).


Willfully violating the Law of Chastity and the covenant you have made is taken as a serious matter, especially if it is repeatedly and if you are enticing others to do the same.

So of course, if a person was to try to convince someone they were seeing / dating / friends with / etc, to have sexual relations before they are married that is a very wrong thing to do and most likely that would end the friendship / hanging out / etc for good, or at least a long time until the person repented and proved that they had changed their ways.

And of course, the person who was offered the temptation to sin would of course warn others not to be in a situation with the person who was the tempter, for their own safety and security.

Chances are it would also be reported to the local Bishop who would council the person doing the tempting that they need to repent and change their ways and ask Jesus Christ to help them be better.

If the person repented and changed their ways, then that's one thing, but if they refused to repent / apologize and continued doing so again, then they will probably find their social circle pretty limited.

The thoughts in your head are another matter, that is between you and Heavenly Father.
Satan will tempt you all the time, and you aren't responsible for who comes knocking at your door, only for who you invite in and start chatting with.
Many have private struggles with any number of kinds of impure or wrong thoughts, that's really between them and God, unless they feel they need help and ask for help and support. Nobody in our Church is going to condemn you for your private struggles with thoughts and temptations.

I understand many Christians today are all about the philosophy of they can willfully do and go on doing most anything they wish without consequence or censure or reproof because "we are forgiven" But that's not correct.

You will find that members of our Church are some of the most caring, most loving and most forgiving people around.
But we don't love the sin, we love the sinner (as we all are sinners, forgiven only by The Atonement of Jesus Christ). We don't justify or condone sin, rather we all work together to all become better and be as Jesus Christ would want us to be. That often means regularly repenting of small sins / mistakes / transgressions and helping lift each other up.

I'll bet that I could list a whole bunch of laws or moral things that if someone in your circle of friends or your extended family did and didn't repent of and kept willfully doing, you would no longer associate with them. There are probably even some acts regarding sexuality that would cause you to not only disassociate yourself with them because of but even perhaps try to get them in trouble for or at least warn others of.

So all that to say,
If in our Church you were to try to seduce others to have sex outside of marriage, you probably will find your dating life coming to an abrupt halt for a good while. Trust is an important thing and when you break trust, it takes a long time to earn it back. People won't want to date or marry or be alone with someone who is untrustworthy when it comes to their safety or Chastity.

And I'm not going to apologize for that at all, it's the way it should be.
It's also the way it was up until the modern infatuation with making sin a virtue.
It's not adultery that has me worked up. Nor would I attend any church that endorses or excuses ANY sin. BUT, to put them in a hiarchy and apply man's societal mores and laws vis a vis the Covenant is wrong. That isn't how God looks at our sin. That isn't how Christ considers our need for salvation. We are filthy and unholy before God to the point that he cannot even look upon us, all of us. NONE ARE GOOD, NO NOT ONE. Once you start to place a hierarchy upon sin you start to buy the stairway. "Well, I'm no Jesus and without sin, but I'm much better than that guy over there!" Wrong. All fall short. None are worthy on their own, and that is exactly how Jesus taught us to regard each other. Man is fallen, and he's not going to get up on his own. So saying that some are better than others is like saying, well that guys legs are broken in thirty places, but that other guy's legs are only broken at the knees. It's not a distinction we are even supposed to make, and if you do you are that much further from understand the necessity for us to not do it through works, and to not try to do it on our own. That no one man's sins are greater than another, and Jesus told many parables to demonstrate just how different God's view of both sin and justice are from our own. If that weren't the case he would not have told us categorically not to cast a stone.

You are reading into the Bible what isn't there. While Paul specifies certain sins are more corrosive and deleterious to the church, he is not placing them in any kind of bad to worst hiarchy specifically, and Christ did not do that AT ALL. In fact, the only thing that actually pissed him off was was blaspheming and apostacy in God's own house. Everything else he pretty much took in stride, and we can speculate on why that is, but I think most theologies think that's pretty obvious.

As for your apostacy (license to sin), of course, but the "why" is even more important than actually "not sinning". Are you not sinning because it is against The Law? There are churches who believe that once you are saved your sinful nature departs and you don't sin, and if you do they say you were never really saved in the first place. This is problematic at all levels. I do not ascribe to that theology AT ALL. No grace. Or, are are you refraining from acting on your sinful thoughts because you love Jesus and no longer want to sin and displease Him? Grace. Putting human law, human politics, and human morality on-top of The Law, and on top of Grace is literally the precursor to a works philosophy. You can't have a works philosophy without that, and you can't have a grace theology with it.

You keep saying that. It isn't Biblical. There ARE NO SMALL sins, and we are fallen and in need of redemption. There are none that are in more or less need of redemption. None that are a little sinful and some that are a lot. There is NO evil or sin in God or Christ. None at all. The test and the mark is absolute purity, and till you understand that it's pass/fail, pure or impure, there is no redemption. The blood covers us and we become white only through faith and love, and before that we are all as black as coal, not shades of gray, and not in degrees.

Ask any pastor and they will tell you that it is a great deal easier to get a bad person to come to Christ than it is one who believes themselves to be good. In fact, that measuring yourself against others and not against perfection (Pride and lack of humility) may be the most impossible obstacle for many "good" people to overcome. You can't use any of man's measuring sticks, only God's, and that one is ridged and unforgiving, and if you fall short you are out. All fall short.

I've said it many times, because I was that guy, and the man who showed my the way probably repeated, "None are good, no not one", to me a thousand times before I actually understood what that meant. There is a ton of mystery, and no one understands completely or completely agrees, and that's ok, but there are big things that Jesus hits you with over and over with, and the need for humility, and understanding how every single person is in dire need of grace is not one of them. That one is clear.

You are right about not accepting sin. But you are wrong that I try to dissociate myself from sinners, because not only am I one, I know that I am no better or worse than they are. I'm just infinitely stronger than they are because I'm not trying to do it off my meager internal power supply. I'm hooked up to a limitless nuclear plant with infinite fuel, and I know it, and I am humbled by it, and I am commanded to try to get them to hook up too, and I'm not going to do that by driving them away or cutting them off. You have to do it sometimes, just as Christ told his apostles to kick the dust off their sandals, but it's a last resort, not a first.

I don't think we completely disagree, and I totally get your point about dating within your church (much less adultery among the married), but I guess it's the inartful way you put it that didn't sound like the tolling of bells to me, but rather more like a clank. Pride is probably the most dangerous and common sin among the faithful, and believing you are without sin, you are just, and you are holy is the most obvious and overt sign of it. Think about Paul in the early letters placing himself just below the Apostles. By his last ones he's chastising the Apostles for refusing to sit with those who don't keep kosher, and he's calling himself "The Chief Sinner". This is the clearest example of Paul growing in his faith, wisdom, and understanding. As all of that grows so too does his humility, and pride becomes less and less of a problem for him. Don't forget, Paul started out a Pharisee believing himself to be holy, just, and higher than all the "ordinary" people. It took him quite a while, even after accepting Grace, to fully get that under control and have the full humility that is required to accept what he really was. It's the same journey we all make, and it is fraught with peril and we must always guard against lest anyone boast.

And that has been the homily for today! ;)