• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

Filter

Firearms Defiance Anti-X SA .223 woox and other various SA components

SCOPES are all sold
Chassis
1. Woox furiosa Micarta black inlays m5 bottom inlet total looking for $1,000 OBO with Hawkins M5 bottom Metal ALL brand new. Will separate if bottom metal sells first. Or trade for a lightweight LA stock/chassis
2. Christensen arms MPP with folder and smoke industries carbon closed stock. $1,000 obo

Stocks
1. Hs precision proof Sendero /m24 barrel channel (2) QD cups mounted on left side $250.
2. HS precision with BDL DM bottom metal super clean will not see rate unless someone wants the bottom metal 1st. This is factory Remington 700 BDL DM setup. $400 as a package
3. Christensen ridgeline stock. Very clean $150

Bottom metal
Remington BDL floor plates
1. Stainless machined follower $150
2. Stainless machined magnum follower $160
3. Gloss black machined follower
IMG_0100.jpeg
IMG_0099.jpeg
IMG_0098.jpeg
IMG_0240.jpeg
IMG_0084.jpeg
IMG_0082.jpeg
IMG_0083.jpeg

MPA Rifle rings or one peice scope mount?

That's a great write up on how to help reverse what so many of us have been conditioned to do over the years/decades which is force ourselves to fit the rifle. Shotgun shooters and archers for decades have known that the best performance comes from adjusting the system to fit you, not the other way around, and that a gun properly fit for one shooter probably doesn't fit anyone else perfectly.

That said it's hard to do for the inexperienced, it's almost a chicken and egg thing, you need experience and knowledge/training to help recognize what a good, stable, comfortable position is for the context of your shooting and then mold the rifle system to that if possible. Mostly because there's a balance between having good form (strait behind the rifle, good trigger reach etc.) and being relaxed/comfortable. For newer shooters though (and even those trying to unlearn bad habits) asking them to get into a comfortable, stable position prone where their shooting position is also good form, is hard to do. Learning that, and getting help setting up you and your rifle really well to your body/position makes the cost of a good rifle course worth it alone.

However, you can get a lot closer on your own with posts like the above and there's been some good videos over the years on how to set up positions, tips etc. One thing I see a lot of is guys tend to run their bipods too low, because they think it's more stable, especially true of bigger guys.
2 things
1st I completely agree with you about the bipods, too many movies and too many bad techniques taughts through generations of hunters

2nd thing........Most intsructors agree with this........... I would rather have a "I never shot before" student than one who "grew up shooting"

For the newbie, We have a clean slate and most times they are open to ideas and will try anything

Seasoned shooters, They need to concentrate to break years or decades of habits and it takes many dry sessions to learn new techniques to and unlearn old muscle memory bad habits. You'll get adult males with tactical backgrounds hate admitting they need help and instruction in something they consider themselves as SMEs. It's not talking bad, but adults, especially males have fragile egos someties when it comes to doing predominately "man things" like shooting

212eldx in .308 hybrid cases?

That's a unsorted headstamp group BTW.

I have said this in another thread, but they do have quite a lot of variance in case weight. I haven't measured all the headstamps for water capacity yet. This week I will.

I shoot with another member here and we both are working up loads with the Hybrid cases. I'm shooting at AXMC with a large firing pin and he is shooing his in a AI with a small firing pin. Small firing pin seems to take more pressure and not pierce primers. I would run into pressures sooner probably around 75K PSI if my calculations are correct on Gordons and QL.

So in your limited testing, the mixed headstamp cases have not produced terrible results at 100 yards.

Have you tried reaching out?

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

Assumptions, assumptions, assumptions ...

I didn't misinterpret it. I chose it.


Which, boiled down, says a statement is true if it accurately describes the current reality. Basically if the statement agrees with the current facts.

As I write the following statement it is the truth.

My mostly full coffee cup is on my desk next to my computer mouse.

Now, in 15-20 minutes when someone reads this statement, for the first time or again, it will no longer be wholly the truth because my coffee cup may still be in the same place but will no longer be mostly full. Does the original statement, still mostly true, still represent the truth? No, because it is no longer entirely factual. There's a big difference between mostly true and all true.

Login to view embedded media
accurate, reality, facts, truth ... you keep using these words (even if only referencing them indirectly)

Thank you for the advice on life choices. In reciprocation I'll say maybe you should consider investing in a dictionary.
Your example of a coffee cup does not hold water when we are addressing things with permanence and really is a strawman argument. Your statement about your coffee cup is a statement tied to a state of reality that is subject to change, so it is loaded. If you had said “at 10am my coffee was full and sitting on my desk”, just because your coffee has now moved or is less full does not change the “current” and unchanging reality that it was on your desk at 10am and full.

Like if I said 10 years ago “my Grandpa is alive”, then he dies five years ago, yes it would be no longer true that my “grandpa is alive today” currently. However it does not mean that grandpa wasn’t alive 10 years ago. That means “currently” it is a historically verifiable fact that your grandpa was once alive, and that truth doesn’t change. So yes it would be “accurate” to say that “fact” is “true” because it corresponds to “reality” (no dictionary needed). Your coffee cup analogy and its wording is word play with loaded language. It would not be wise to use it to come to conclusions about the nature of truth or reality. If you ask the wrong questions, you will get the wrong answers.

This discussion reminds me of people who say “all truth is relative”, yet not realizing in saying that they are making an absolute truth claim.

Entry level gun and scope

Have you ever looked at a prs production class rifle from mpa?

it’s all dependent on your budget but there’s a lot of stuff packed in for the $.

mpa pmr pro rifle

also has several caliber choices.
i like 6.5cm bc of commercial availability , easy recoil, and can do the job from 100-1k-1m for the occasional 1mile trip

best advise ever given to me was save $ and buy for today. spending extra money for the future well the future may change and you may want something different.

sooner you have gear in hand sooner you can go enjoy and see what works for you.

Anothet FU from the Supremes

I won't keep you waiting long- "invader" is goofy hyperbole, but I'll play anyway:

It's not complicated- you are in the United States (check the GPS on your phone if you're not sure), you live under our laws.

Simple.
""Invader" is hyperbole"?

Not even a little bit. I believe most countries in the world will kill you or imprison you at a minimum for illegally entering their country. The only people trying to minimize this are globalists or mewing sheep who have been programmed by the left wing faggotry commonly used in university brainwashing.