Filter

14.9 5000 meters supersonic

Not sure why you are so critical of what may be a critical development in the world of receivers. This is actually quite a milestone weather you choose to acknowledge it or not. I'm not going to criticize your shell holder design, but it is an un-proven design at best and we wanted to be sure of function over anything else this time around.
Dan - I'm simply talking about a simpler design that would have saved time and money to get your customer to dealing with the cartridge-side of the firearm - the most significant issue. What critical development are you referring to - scaling up a current design? Super niche application because making the chambering work is the issue - more than just going bang.
  • Haha
Reactions: 50WEST

Trump is back…the “Now What” thread

11,000 posts jesus christ dude go outside
Why you asked this question proves we haven't reached your level of retardation and probably never will.

Go back to your crayons. Maybe someday they'll let you use a pencil and not be worried you might hurt yourself.
A state sponsored caregiver wouldn't have replied due to legal reasons, I get it. Love is love man, hope you two are happy.
  • Like
Reactions: Loner

What's the deal with "Aid to Ukraine?"

I honestly don't understand your point you're trying to make by the way you structured your response. I'm not trying to insult your grammar, I seriously don't know what you're trying to convey, friend. I have a thumb-biting reciprocating charging handle and dual button pressure switch on the left side and the way I set my gun up works well for me. How do you run your scar heavy?

Trump is back…the “Now What” thread

are you his homosexual life partner or his state supplied caregiver?
Why you asked this question proves we haven't reached your level of retardation and probably never will.

Go back to your crayons. Maybe someday they'll let you use a pencil and not be worried you might hurt yourself.

14.9 5000 meters supersonic

Hi, Dan - so 3" OD x 12" long? Unclear why a shell holder design was not pursued - would have been MUCH smaller, possibly even smaller than the EXS. Simply a customer requirement?

BTW, as your customer well knows, the action has never been a significant milestone in making his project work. FWIW, getting my "test platform" would have moved reality forward with a lot less time and expense. Gotten to go or no-go years ago. Anyway...
Not sure why you are so critical of what may be a critical development in the world of receivers. This is actually quite a milestone weather you choose to acknowledge it or not. I'm not going to criticize your shell holder design, but it is an un-proven design at best and we wanted to be sure of function over anything else this time around.
  • Like
Reactions: 50WEST

Magpul - 2025 New Maztech X4-FCS & X4-LRF

It would be more interesting to me if the unit was for a 5-25x 56mm objective scope, but it’s a good step in the right direction.

Sometime in my life (knock on wood) I assume regular people will have access to better-than-current (Burris, Steiner, etc) integrated electro-optics, like that fancy Vortex XM-157 unit for the mil crowd.
This will be killer if they make it for a legit optic vs a 1-6 or the rare 1-10 with a 30mm tube.