Filter

Ukraine war Bullshit.

Folks think Russian tactics still be like the old Soviet days, but those who have been watching have been seeing how the Russians have rapidly changed their tactics and formations to match the threat, some are pretty ingenious.
Da cumrade. Ingenious puccian tactics like hedgehog bmp
1749310887788.png

This was impervious to infantry knife assaults for ukrops fear of tetanus, causing nazi regime to waste $800 fpv drone to destroy. puccia has infinity bmp2, so this is a win for puccia, it was also outdated and we didnt need it anyway.
1749310982706.png


Here you have a puccian main battle tank updated with modern anti-nazi-drone cope cage for tactical advantage, PLUS the famous morale-improving emergency exit slide!
1749311400341.png


These "turtle tanks" not only look big and strong, they contain the vehicle crews remains and provide a better chance of battlefield cremation, speeding up logistics! checkmate ukranazis.
1749311637218.png

1749311653945.png


Some infantry prefer to use ingenious, modern personal transports as shown here
1749312054306.png


Or when you need to get your entire squad to the trench in a hurry, russian soldiers can elect to use rubberized scooby doo vans. tires are known to be excellent at shielding humans from metal at high speeds.
1749312122721.png


If you need a little extra firepower, you can just weld a helicopter rocket-pod to your shitbox if you're a puccia soldier
1749312236561.png


puccia has also been able to test it's latest and greatest prototype death machines. pictured here is our "terminator" (badass name, so you know it's awesome.) Don't mind that it's destroyed, it's really just a good opportunity to test performance against explosives, so the next generation can be even better. I know we only produced 33 since production began in 2002, at this rate of 1.3 produced per year, and now that we're at war we are losing 1 year year, by 2048 we should have 7 more total. hell yeah
1749312706718.png


My question is, how much more do the ukranazis need to escalate their war until the gloves truly come off and puccia rolls out the t-14 armata?
1749312829892.png
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: SNB and theLBC

Ukraine war Bullshit.

I think some people are delusional at the least.

not sure how they would know...

Login to view embedded media

That film was supposed to show a hit on all that ordinance? Somehow secondary explosion was not what I would expect at all.

I figure that it is a ruse to hide the black market sale that is now happening, and has been going on.

Maggie’s Funny & awesome pics, vids and memes thread (work safe, no nudity)

Been there, that damned mast swings everyway but right. Scares the heck out of you. It’s a lot higher up there than it looks from down here. About as stable as a democrat with a bottle of gasoline in his/her/they/them hand.
As an observant person could surmise, I am infatuated with sailing ships. I was probably a pirate in a previous plane of existence. The thought of living on a boat and migrating along the east coast from New England to South America has been something I dreamed about.

Do you drink anything while shooting?

Water.

The “electrolyte replacement” mix-ins all taste like shit and are unnecessary unless you are doing sustained cardio between stages. Let’s face it, shooting is basically a sedentary activity. During an 8 hour match day, you might be mildly active for 20 minutes.
Most of the guys I’ve seen at matches in the summer here are about 1/2 of a breath from being a heat casualty. Electrolyte replacement can be important if you’re sweating like a pig, whether you’re doing wind sprints or sitting in the shade…
  • Like
Reactions: LR1845

Finding a wife

About as true as its gets,... in the last 10 years I've been looking

Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Bonus video. This girl should be put in the fun-zone. If any of you gents want to meet up with her, I would suggest using an alias and getting a burner phone. Bring a kitten with you on the first date and once you tear her away from the cat, she might do ANYTHING for you. Remember - fun-zone only.

Login to view embedded media

My Grok discussion about Harvey Milk and predatory behavior

I asked Grok about Harvey Milk being a child predator

Grok:
I didn’t ignore Lillian Faderman’s biography; rather, my previous response focused on the primary source of the “child predator” claim, which often centers on Randy Shilts’ The Mayor of Castro Street and the relationship with Jack Galen McKinley. Faderman’s work, particularly The Gay Revolution (2015), does mention Milk’s relationship with McKinley, who was 16 or 17 when they met in 1964. She describes it as a consensual relationship, noting McKinley’s age and troubled background, but doesn’t frame it as predatory or illegal. Faderman contextualizes it within the era’s social norms and Milk’s pattern of relationships with younger men, without evidence of him targeting prepubescent children or engaging in criminal behavior.

My Response:
Ignoring Fabermans biography is spinning the Milk story that Milk is the victim of baseless accusations



Grok:
The omission of Faderman’s specific reference in my earlier answer wasn’t intentional but a result of prioritizing Shilts’ account, as it’s more frequently cited in this debate. Faderman’s biography aligns with the view that the relationship raises ethical questions due to the age gap and power dynamics but doesn’t substantiate the “child predator” label under clinical or legal definitions. If you’re referring to specific passages or claims in Faderman’s work I missed, could you share those details? I can dig deeper into her text or other sources to clarify.


My response:
Then you should include Faberman biography information when others ask you about Milk and young boys


I understand your concern that omitting Faderman’s biography might seem like it’s framing Milk as a victim of baseless accusations. To clarify, I didn’t intend to ignore Faderman’s work or spin the narrative. My previous response focused on Shilts’ The Mayor of Castro Street because it’s often the primary source cited in discussions about Milk’s relationship with Jack Galen McKinley, the 16- or 17-year-old in question. However, let’s address Faderman’s account directly to ensure I’m engaging with your point.


In Lillian Faderman’s The Gay Revolution (2015), she discusses Milk’s relationship with McKinley, noting that Milk met him in 1964 when McKinley was a teenager (16 or 17) and a runaway with a history of substance abuse. Faderman describes the relationship as consensual and doesn’t label it as predatory, but she acknowledges the age difference and Milk’s pattern of being attracted to younger men, often those with troubled backgrounds. She places this in the context of the 1960s, when social norms around age and relationships differed, and doesn’t suggest Milk’s behavior was illegal or targeted prepubescent children. Faderman’s account doesn’t frame Milk as a victim but rather presents his personal life as complex, focusing on his broader contributions to gay rights.


The “child predator” accusation, as you’ve raised, often stems from critics who interpret the McKinley relationship as inherently exploitative due to the age gap and power dynamics. These critics, including groups like SaveCalifornia, point to such relationships to argue Milk’s legacy is tainted. Faderman’s biography doesn’t refute the relationship but also doesn’t endorse the predator label, instead offering a nuanced view that avoids sensationalizing it.


If it seems I’m spinning the story, that’s not my intent. My goal is to ground the discussion in evidence. Faderman’s account, like Shilts’, confirms the relationship with McKinley but doesn’t provide evidence that Milk’s actions meet the legal or clinical definition of a “child predator” (e.g., targeting prepubescent children or breaking age-of-consent laws). The age of consent in New York in 1964 was complex—often 17 for heterosexual relationships, with sodomy laws potentially criminalizing homosexual acts regardless of age—but there’s no record of Milk facing legal charges for this relationship.


If you feel Faderman’s biography contains specific details I’m overlooking—like direct evidence of predatory behavior or other relationships with minors—please point me to those passages or specifics. I can also search for additional sources or X posts to cross-check. My aim is to address the accusation head-on without dismissing your perspective or the complexity of Milk’s personal life. What specific information from Faderman’s work are you referring to that you think I’m missing?
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC