Ukraine war Bullshit.

do you mean when the neocons tried to cross Russia's red lines in Georgia, and encouraged Saakashvili to try to stomp out the South Ossetians and Abkhazia, which were friendly to their kin across the border in Russia?

Amazing how the neocons (rebranded one-world order trotskyists) believe in color revolutions for their puppets, and try to flout the overthrow as "the will of the people" but when a large group of real people say fuck it and refuse to go along with the new neocon installed government ........ then suddenly those people have no say anymore and they "belong to the state". Like some kind of perverse feudal throwback.

Damn neocons and their anti-American ideals. I'll take our social contract, the Declaration of Independence, and believe everyone deserves to live by it's freedom-loving ideals, over the neocon's Jewish one world communism any day.
If there were English speakers in a small region of Mexico I would not consider them “Americans”, or be for “liberating” them. Oddly, this is a very typical excuse for tyrants across time to invade.

I wonder if you were Russian if you would think the dream of so many former communists (or still communists) to reunify the USSR were neocons?

It’s not all black and white, and the Russian army was like a band of wild picts burning and raping their way across South Ossetia. Russian speaking or not I’m pretty sure their victims would have prefered not to be “liberated” thusly.

But I wasn’t commenting on that, just how unimpressive the Russian Army had proven to be. I certainly don’t want to be enemies with Russia, but they’re not the advanced and modernized force many claim them to be. They look a lot like they have for the last 85 or so years.
 
Did you trade front line conscription for propaganda spreading? Or is it like an MOS where you do a stint of propaganda or a stint on a conscription detail?

I trigger demorat, American value hating snowflakes like you for free. With this thing called the internet you can do it from anywhere, a trench, a Walmart and even your sweat stained couch. The world is truly an amazing place.
 
If there were English speakers in a small region of Mexico I would not consider them “Americans”, or be for “liberating” them. Oddly, this is a very typical excuse for tyrants across time to invade.

I wonder if you were Russian if you would think the dream of so many former communists (or still communists) to reunify the USSR were neocons?

It’s not all black and white, and the Russian army was like a band of wild picts burning and raping their way across South Ossetia. Russian speaking or not I’m pretty sure their victims would have prefered not to be “liberated” thusly.

But I wasn’t commenting on that, just how unimpressive the Russian Army had proven to be. I certainly don’t want to be enemies with Russia, but they’re not the advanced and modernized force many claim them to be. They look a lot like they have for the last 85 or so years.

Turns out the puccian version of liberation means arresting, torturing, displacing and replacing the local populace if they can bum rush them- or bombing their homes into an uninhabitable unrecognizable moonscape if they can't. I'm sure the Donbas boomers with bad knees and nowhere to go have welcomed being obliterated with artillery as a sweet release from the decadent folds of the nazi Ukrainian regime. Who needs running water or indoor plumbing when you can instead have drunken HIV positive soldiers loot your home and introduce you to lovely Soviet prison culture in your own home!
 
When the people who live in a place revolt against their government that is generally referred to as a rebellion, revolution, or at least an uprising.

That is very different from an invasion by people who do not live there. That you conflate the two further proves my point.

As far as I know the US government didn’t help them or support them in any way. Or, am I wrong about that?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ken226
When the people who live in a place revolt against their government that is generally referred to as a rebellion, revolution, or at least an uprising.

That is very different from an invasion by people who do not live there. That you conflate the two further proves my point.

As far as I know the US government didn’t help them or support them in any way. Or, am I wrong about that?
What would you call the actual civil war going on there since 2014?
It's not like they just rolled tanks into a utopian wonderland where everyone lived in perfect harmony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eostech and Kamerad
Looks like Russia is holding in this area.

Screen Shot 2025-08-25 at 9.18.22 AM.png


That is very different from an invasion by people who do not live there. That you conflate the two further proves my point.

As far as I know the US government didn’t help them or support them in any way. Or, am I wrong about that?
Yes we did assist them and pleged support before Russia moved in.



Could you imagine long time Russian Politician in Canada or Mexico speaking about supporting a revolution. Do you think the US Gov would just sit back and do nothing?

The denial we bear or share in responsibility of this conflict is severely disturbing to me, and the amount of people who seemingly dismiss it.
 
Looks like Russia is holding in this area.

View attachment 8753966


Yes we did assist them and pleged support before Russia moved in.



Could you imagine long time Russian Politician in Canada or Mexico speaking about supporting a revolution. Do you think the US Gov would just sit back and do nothing?

The denial we bear or share in responsibility of this conflict is severely disturbing to me, and the amount of people who seemingly dismiss it.


Do you think the US military would try to thunder run Mexico city and utterly fail on the battlefield and world stage, lose 1 million soldiers in 3 years, a third of our strategic bomber fleet, lose a Ford class carrier and freedom of navigation in the gulf of Mexico, stall in Juarez and have Russian boomers excitedly reporting that despite taking over 300% casualties we've finally managed to capture Tijuana after reducing it entirely to rubble, while dismantling any non state-approved media outlets and openly murdering any gov official that wasn't hell bent on annexing Mexico?
 
Do you think the US military would try to thunder run Mexico city and utterly fail on the battlefield and world stage, lose 1 million soldiers in 3 years, a third of our strategic bomber fleet, lose a Ford class carrier and freedom of navigation in the gulf of Mexico, stall in Juarez and have Russian boomers excitedly reporting that despite taking over 300% casualties we've finally managed to capture Tijuana after reducing it entirely to rubble, while dismantling any non state-approved media outlets and openly murdering any gov official that wasn't hell bent on annexing Mexico?
Haven't heard thunder run in decades sometimes called road runner too back then using M48's
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka
  • Like
Reactions: 375fan
American volunteers went down to Texas to fight with them against Mexico, but our government had zero to do with it. They provided nothing, and even the Texas cannons were bought with private funds, so yea, that was very fucking different. It was not a proxy war between powers, but a very elemental rebellion against a distant and tyrannical central government.

I know people like to believe that it was Russian speakers in Donbas that rose up against Kiev, but I have also seen quite a bit of ink spilled where it is claimed they were Russian troops in civilian cloths who basically seized town halls and police stations. I'm skeptical it was any kind of popular rebellion. But it really doesn't fucking matter. Putin invaded because he could. He's been quite open about wanting to reconstitute the USSR. He considers all of Ukraine his, and I kind of do too. They're all "Russians" as far as I'm concerned. I know that rubs people the wrong way, but they all were "the enemy" when I was a kid and serving.

I don't fucking know, and neither does anyone else. I think I'm in the majority in wanting to stay the fuck out of it, because there aren't any "good guys" to support. There are, however, a shitton of innocent civilians getting pummeled, so I'm with the President on just wanting the killing to stop, on no other grounds but basic humanity. Hopefully he can get it done. If not, oh well, not worth WWIII over it anyway.
 
They're all "Russians" as far as I'm concerned. I know that rubs people the wrong way, but they all were "the enemy" when I was a kid and serving.
Putin would agree with you, but the Ukrainians who actually live in Ukraine and are fighting and enduring one way or another, every day wholeheartedly disagree. Turns out an armed populace who doesn't want to bow down to a tyrant and his army of hepatitis positive steppe bros is extremely hard to kill and conquer, whoddathunk it?
 
American volunteers went down to Texas to fight with them against Mexico, but our government had zero to do with it. They provided nothing, and even the Texas cannons were bought with private funds, so yea, that was very fucking different. It was not a proxy war between powers, but a very elemental rebellion against a distant and tyrannical central government.

I know people like to believe that it was Russian speakers in Donbas that rose up against Kiev, but I have also seen quite a bit of ink spilled where it is claimed they were Russian troops in civilian cloths who basically seized town halls and police stations. I'm skeptical it was any kind of popular rebellion. But it really doesn't fucking matter. Putin invaded because he could. He's been quite open about wanting to reconstitute the USSR. He considers all of Ukraine his, and I kind of do too. They're all "Russians" as far as I'm concerned. I know that rubs people the wrong way, but they all were "the enemy" when I was a kid and serving.

I don't fucking know, and neither does anyone else. I think I'm in the majority in wanting to stay the fuck out of it, because there aren't any "good guys" to support. There are, however, a shitton of innocent civilians getting pummeled, so I'm with the President on just wanting the killing to stop, on no other grounds but basic humanity. Hopefully he can get it done. If not, oh well, not worth WWIII over it anyway.
It’s because Putin recognized the political move the west helping to push and realized he was about to loose any leverage they had.

Good friend of mine’s, friends father works at the Zaparizhia (spelling)nuclear power plant. No, not everybody in the area supports Russia. I have heard some stories through her about some of the crap going on. And no they were not at all happy about this war.
 
Do you think the US military would try to thunder run Mexico city and utterly fail on the battlefield and world stage, lose 1 million soldiers in 3 years, a third of our strategic bomber fleet, lose a Ford class carrier and freedom of navigation in the gulf of Mexico, stall in Juarez and have Russian boomers excitedly reporting that despite taking over 300% casualties we've finally managed to capture Tijuana after reducing it entirely to rubble, while dismantling any non state-approved media outlets and openly murdering any gov official that wasn't hell bent on annexing Mexico?
I bet you think I read that
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Darayavaus
American volunteers went down to Texas to fight with them against Mexico, but our government had zero to do with it. They provided nothing, and even the Texas cannons were bought with private funds, so yea, that was very fucking different. It was not a proxy war between powers, but a very elemental rebellion against a distant and tyrannical central government.

I know people like to believe that it was Russian speakers in Donbas that rose up against Kiev, but I have also seen quite a bit of ink spilled where it is claimed they were Russian troops in civilian cloths who basically seized town halls and police stations. I'm skeptical it was any kind of popular rebellion. But it really doesn't fucking matter. Putin invaded because he could. He's been quite open about wanting to reconstitute the USSR. He considers all of Ukraine his, and I kind of do too. They're all "Russians" as far as I'm concerned. I know that rubs people the wrong way, but they all were "the enemy" when I was a kid and serving.

I don't fucking know, and neither does anyone else. I think I'm in the majority in wanting to stay the fuck out of it, because there aren't any "good guys" to support. There are, however, a shitton of innocent civilians getting pummeled, so I'm with the President on just wanting the killing to stop, on no other grounds but basic humanity. Hopefully he can get it done. If not, oh well, not worth WWIII over it anyway.
he could have gotten it done or well started on 1/21. he didn't and upped the ante. reasons are obscure and will likely remain undisclosed like everything else going on.
 
Funny fact about humans is you can have two identically intelligent persons up to date with news and aware of the buttons and colors. However when you press the blue button person A lifts off into a rage while person B stares flabbergasted wondering who shot out A’s brains out. Well then the brown button goes and person B has a fucking diarrhea of a lifetime and person A is dumbstruck at what just happened. Same shit on this and other threads, people aware of Covid scam fall for Russia 3rd world country about to invade “world” or vice versa. All the while same lying sacks of shit pressing the same set of buttons and people not realizing its all a fucking rigged casino when those who play by its rules always loose.
 
Do you think the US military would try to thunder run Mexico city and utterly fail on the battlefield and world stage, lose 1 million soldiers in 3 years, a third of our strategic bomber fleet, lose a Ford class carrier and freedom of navigation in the gulf of Mexico, stall in Juarez and have Russian boomers excitedly reporting that despite taking over 300% casualties we've finally managed to capture Tijuana after reducing it entirely to rubble, while dismantling any non state-approved media outlets and openly murdering any gov official that wasn't hell bent on annexing Mexico?
You haven't paid much attention to US military actions in Central and South American have you.

Currently.



In the past.





Good God people like you are fucking retarded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 232593
Here’s a chronological timeline table of U.S. invasions, coups, or interventions where human rights / democracy was invoked as part of the justification (even if not the real motive):


Year(s)CountryActionJustification Cited (Human Rights / Democracy)Outcome
1846–1848MexicoMexican–American WarClaimed to bring liberty/democracy to annexed landsU.S. seized ~½ of Mexico’s territory
1898CubaSpanish–American WarStop Spanish human rights abuses in CubaSpain defeated, U.S. occupied Cuba
1899–1902PhilippinesPhilippine–American War“Civilizing mission,” liberating from SpainBrutal counterinsurgency, U.S. colonial rule
1953IranCIA coup (Operation Ajax)Deposed “authoritarian” MossadeghShah restored, repression worsened
1954GuatemalaCIA coupClaimed Árbenz was communist threat to democracyMilitary dictatorship installed
1960–65Congo (DRC)Interference in leadershipPrevent authoritarianism/communismLumumba killed, Mobutu installed
1965Dominican RepublicU.S. invasionClaimed to stop dictatorship, protect democracyU.S. occupation, conservative gov’t
1973ChileBacked coup against AllendePrevent authoritarianism, “save democracy”Pinochet dictatorship (mass repression)
1983GrenadaInvasionRestore democracy, protect U.S. medical studentsPro-U.S. gov’t installed
1989PanamaInvasionRemove Noriega, restore democracy, stop abusesNoriega ousted, heavy civilian casualties
1991Iraq (Kuwait War)Military campaignStop Saddam’s atrocities in KuwaitIraq expelled from Kuwait, Saddam remained
1992–93Somalia“Operation Restore Hope”Humanitarian famine relief, stop warlordsFailed; U.S. withdrew after Black Hawk Down
1994HaitiInvasionRestore elected President AristideAristide reinstated, instability continued
1995BosniaNATO/U.S. bombingStop ethnic cleansingDayton Peace Accords, fragile peace
1999Kosovo (Serbia)NATO bombingStop Serbian ethnic cleansing of AlbaniansKosovo autonomy under UN, eventual independence
2001–2021AfghanistanInvasion/occupationLater reframed as defending women’s rights/democracyTaliban overthrown, later returned to power
2003IraqInvasionClaimed WMDs + Saddam’s human rights abusesSaddam ousted, massive instability
2011LibyaNATO bombingResponsibility to Protect (R2P) vs GaddafiGaddafi killed, Libya fragmented
2011–presentSyriaSupport for rebels, strikesAssad’s human rights abuses citedWar continues, Assad remains



⚖️ Note: In nearly all cases, U.S. leaders blended humanitarian or democratic language with strategic or economic goals (oil, Cold War rivalry, military positioning, etc.).
 
The allegation that Russia aims to invade all of Europe and reconstitute the former Soviet Union stems from a superficial or poor understanding of its strategic goals. The most commonly cited “evidence” for such is very loosely inferred from Putin’s 2021 essay on Russian - Ukrainian unity. This is the idea that the Russophobic Western Europe largely subscibes to.

In reality, Russia’s actions are primarily driven by security concerns identical to our own.
 
Last edited:

Zelensky can have at it, if that's what he chooses to do. We should have no part in it.

If Zelensky refuses to pursue a negotiated settlement with Russia, then USA should refuse to continue to fund an unwinnable war. Ukraine can try to get those regions back without us.
 
Zelensky can have at it, if that's what he chooses to do. We should have no part in it.

If Zelensky refuses to pursue a negotiated settlement with Russia, then USA should refuse to continue to fund an unwinnable war. Ukraine can try to get those regions back without us.
Are we funding it now? I was under the impression we are just selling them weapons now?
 
Are we funding it now? I was under the impression we are just selling them weapons now?

Beyond providing weapons (paid for by US taxpayers), we are also funding their government and even teacher salaries over there.

From a December 2024 article here:

"A U.S. official said the funding brings the total in U.S. budget aid to Ukraine to just over $30 billion since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Most of those funds are used to keep Ukraine's government running by paying salaries to teachers and other state employees."

And Ukraine isn't buying shit from us. They don't have any money. Anything we "sell" to them will never be paid back.
 
Beyond providing weapons (paid for by US taxpayers), we are also funding their government and even teacher salaries over there.

From a December 2024 article here:

"A U.S. official said the funding brings the total in U.S. budget aid to Ukraine to just over $30 billion since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Most of those funds are used to keep Ukraine's government running by paying salaries to teachers and other state employees."

And Ukraine isn't buying shit from us. They don't have any money. Anything we "sell" to them will never be paid back.
It took the USSR 60+ years to pay off WW2 lend-lease. What's the point of having a military industrial complex if i can't watch it demilitarize Russians?
 

Attachments

  • A JDAM-ER 500-pound bomb with the inscription “Glory to Ukraine and God Bless America!” 040723...jpg
    A JDAM-ER 500-pound bomb with the inscription “Glory to Ukraine and God Bless America!” 040723...jpg
    615.8 KB · Views: 1
Beyond providing weapons (paid for by US taxpayers), we are also funding their government and even teacher salaries over there.

From a December 2024 article here:

"A U.S. official said the funding brings the total in U.S. budget aid to Ukraine to just over $30 billion since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Most of those funds are used to keep Ukraine's government running by paying salaries to teachers and other state employees."

And Ukraine isn't buying shit from us. They don't have any money. Anything we "sell" to them will never be paid back.
Yeah that was Biden. I know we were which was one of my biggest issues with it.

I thought Trump flipped the script on that.

Screen Shot 2025-08-25 at 7.33.14 PM.png

Notice how at the end of q2 in 2025 the increase from 24 to 25 has drastically reduced.
Screen Shot 2025-08-25 at 7.40.47 PM.png





As long as we aren't footing the bill. Buy all the weapons we are willing to come off of.
 
Last edited:
Yeah that was Biden. I know we were which was one of my biggest issues with it.

I thought Trump flipped the script on that.

View attachment 8754305
Notice how at the end of q2 in 2025 the increase from 24 to 25 has drastically reduced.
View attachment 8754307




As long as we aren't footing the bill. Buy all the weapons we are willing to come off of.

I agree that Biden was a much bigger sponsor of this war than Trump.

However Ukraine isn't buying anything, they have no money. They should pay back everything we've donated to them, plus interest as far as I'm concerned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DIBBS and Snuby642
When the people who live in a place revolt against their government that is generally referred to as a rebellion, revolution, or at least an uprising.

That is very different from an invasion by people who do not live there. That you conflate the two further proves my point.

As far as I know the US government didn’t help them or support them in any way. Or, am I wrong about that?
again, geez.




1756171275707.png


the texan revolution. independence. desire to become part of the USA. the mexican american war.
it's like a copy of the Ukraine war, except with beaners instead of hohols
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Eostech and ken226
However Ukraine isn't buying anything, they have no money. They should pay back everything we've donated to them, plus interest as far as I'm concerned.
Unfortunately the US will not get paid back in cash or anything else with value. Long past time to turn off the cash/wepaons flow to Uke. Total waste of money and resources. Hell, we should never have given them a dime from the beginning, anyone with half of a working brain should've seen this for what it is, an un-winnable war for Uke.
 
Do you think the US military would try to thunder run Mexico city and utterly fail on the battlefield and world stage, lose 1 million soldiers in 3 years, a third of our strategic bomber fleet, lose a Ford class carrier and freedom of navigation in the gulf of Mexico, stall in Juarez and have Russian boomers excitedly reporting that despite taking over 300% casualties we've finally managed to capture Tijuana after reducing it entirely to rubble, while dismantling any non state-approved media outlets and openly murdering any gov official that wasn't hell bent on annexing Mexico?
you think Ukraine did any of that?


Do you think it's air you breathing now? (farting Morpheus ...


Ukraine didnt do shit. without the USA and to a lesser extent the eurofags, Ukraine would have lasted 2 weeks.
 
Unfortunately the US will not get paid back in cash or anything else with value. Long past time to turn off the cash/wepaons flow to Uke. Total waste of money and resources. Hell, we should never have given them a dime from the beginning, anyone with half of a working brain should've seen this for what it is, an un-winnable war for Uke.

Very true.
 
Why are you mad?
I'm not mad, I'm disgusted. Get a dictionary and look up the definitions of both and learn the difference between the two.
Disgusted by the waste of money and lives in a war that Uke can not win.
Disgusted by the countries and governments that continue to give money and weapons to the Uke in a war they can not win , resulting in more needless deaths on both sides.
Disgusted by Z boy for not looking after his people but letting his foolish pride and ego prevent him from ending this war and stopping the needless bloodshed and loss of life on both sides. He can not win this and he should be smart enough to see that and if not he should not be leader/president.
Comprende? Or are you too drunk on the koolaid to understand what I'm saying?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Eostech and kthomas
I'm not mad, I'm disgusted. Get a dictionary and look up the definitions of both and learn the difference between the two.
Disgusted by the waste of money and lives in a war that Uke can not win.
Disgusted by the countries and governments that continue to give money and weapons to the Uke in a war they can not win , resulting in more needless deaths on both sides.
Disgusted by Z boy for not looking after his people but letting his foolish pride and ego prevent him from ending this war and stopping the needless bloodshed and loss of life on both sides. He can not win this and he should be smart enough to see that and if not he should not be leader/president.
Comprende? Or are you too drunk on the koolaid to understand what I'm saying?
this troll you are talking to is the substantiation of Stalin's comment that one death is a tragedy, but a million deaths are a statistic.

life and loss don't mean anything to people like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kthomas
What some of you seem to omit and is rather important is the whole CISR package that is provided to the Ukrainians. So if you are objective and honest there can be only one conclusion on the involvement of the West and that is that West is actively participating in war with Russia. The only reason why this isnt an all out or nuclear is because Russia decided not to hit sources of help (command/logistics centers in Germany, Romania, Poland, starlink and other satellites, Nato drones in international airspace) why this is so only they know for sure but answers in the line of “were slowly cooking the western frog near our borders” seems logical however some (like idiots here) consider this a weakness as they must be weak since they dont run over Ukraine in a week and slap us in the face or our mighty army would crush Russia in half an hour.
PCR considers not striking West a blunder by Putin as only force is recognized. He knows how US apparatus breathes so he might be correct and i would tend to agree that if pushed and bullied best response is full force retaliation however i suspect things at this level are not so simple.

PS: Those that “hate” Russia or people of Russia are really bigots as now they have perfect opportunity to put their training and hate to use and join the Ukrops in “killing commies…”