Come at me bro...

[truth]

This drill is shot initializing at 7 yards. When the audible synaptic response module is triggered, the operator will advance and engage all targets in tactical order within designated weapon system deployment area.

Target matrix is aligned to replicate real world inner and outer global conflicts, where assaulter assets would encounter a diversified threat environment encompassing terrestrial or extra terrestrial threats.

 

[bullseye13]

Impressive stuff there...

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

Impressive stuff there...

Yup ..... Proving that anyone with an AR can simply make-up defensive tactics and begin to teach them as gospel.

Shooting while moving through a threat is accepted and proven. But giving away your firearm while doing it is deeply flawed.

 

[truth]

Um...someone isn't getting it.

When a standard kinetic response to a threat is not yielding a positive effect on target, SOP should be to utilize the Sweep the Leg Drill. Moving from conventional gravity zones to the legs immobilizes the target, allowing for a cascading system failure of the threat's combat chassis.

With mobility exploitation of the target, follow up evaluation becomes easier for ballistic tasking.

Depending on operator's munitions platform, ordinance delivery system, and battle operations spectrum- the Sweep the Leg Drill can be augmented with a maximum impact combatives package.

 

[truth]

For effective employment calculations must be made using either analog or digital means, bringing to bear maximum accuracy and fight stopping potential for unsighted target discrimination and prosecution.

The correct use of blind fire is a low risk high yield tactic that delivers game changing potential for asymmetric battle space supremacy, gaining residual operational capability for plus up of ground assets.

Due to the user friendly nature of this TTP- theater level interoperability, compatibility, and integration issues are minimized allowing ease of organizational and multi-level communication for blue force partners.

When operating within permissive threat matrix environments using combat effective blind fire allows an individual operator to maintain a more positive battle space assimilation posture.

[video=youtube;XU28VypI-o4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU28VypI-o4[/video]

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

Getting it just fine: You know that people posting after you are going to think it's real.

I admit that the reference to 'anyone' was a bit obscure, but to be more specific just look at the whole Suarez blading thing combined with paintball group-tactics...

 

[Maggot]

^^^^Ole smoke and mirrors is at it again^^^^^^

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

^^^^Ole smoke and mirrors is at it again^^^^^^

Maggot,

Had I known you were on this Thread I would have used words with no more than two syllables and posted in capital letters to help you understand.

Nevertheless, I welcome you sharing your experience in any discussion of tactics ... Even if you limit your comments to keyboard tactics.

 

[Centuriator]

These videos are just jokes, um ... right? I think they are pretty funny, "Using effective tactical blind fire..."

 

[Maggot]

Maggot,

Had I known you were on this Thread I would have used words with no more than two syllables and posted in capital letters to help you understand.

Nevertheless, I welcome you sharing your experience in any discussion of tactics ... Even if you limit your comments to keyboard tactics.

If you call those tactics, well I think you need to start posting over at B'ARF.com. Two syllables?

Isn't that s a bit above your pay grade, Smokey?

 

[Graham]

Isn't that s a bit above your pay grade, Smokey?

I defer to your superior experience with tactics and your superior earning capacity.

If you have anything constructive to add about tactics based on your superior knowledge of the subject, I'm all ears.

 

[Maggot]

I defer to your superior experience with tactics and your superior earning capacity.

If you have anything constructive to add about tactics based on your superior knowledge of the subject, I'm all ears.

so it seems.....

 

[truth]

This flame war fucking sucks. Bring your A game or STFU.

 

[Maggot]

This flame war fucking sucks. Bring your A game or STFU.

That is Smokie's A game, while I'm just foolin around. And that's the TRUTH, truth

 

[klf]

That is Smokie's A game, while I'm just foolin around. And that's the TRUTH, truth

You go maggotater. They now not who they fuckuth with. Or is it whom? Anyway I haven't been on much and it's good to see you haven't lost it.

 

[Maggot]

You go maggotater. They now not who they fuckuth with. Or is it whom? Anyway I haven't been on much and it's good to see you haven't lost it.

Maggotater. I like that. Im just back myself, K. good to see ya around.

 

[bullet65]

those videos are funny

 

[RobertB]

LOL Funny stuff. I must go practice them NOW!

 

[Darkside-Six]

Damn, I've been doing it wrong this whole time!!

 

[Maggot]

Damn, I've been doing it wrong this whole time!!

As you're learning, NuB, this place is a treasure trove of valuable info. LOL

 

[truth]

Reduced sized targets are a value added force multiplier in any systemic training package.

Our patent pending diminished target unit allows the individual operator to zero their weapon system where distances are limited by range space.

The ability to neutralize this target at 1 yard guarantees the same skill and ability to kinetically strike the equivalent sized target at 500 yards. A clear understanding is often hampered by tacit assumptions and urban myths- for example a cone of deviation that distance would introduce.

Our extensive multi-tier assessment has proven counter conclusive and has shown that using this target system is superior for plus up of individual kinetic capabilities and can be used to fully replace all long range marksmanship initiatives.

 

[Artifact]

Hahah

 

[Cartman]

You jokers laugh all you want but that first training program is going to prepare me for extraterrestrial threats!

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

As you're learning, NuB,

LOL! He's not exactly a newbie.

 

[Maggot]

LOL! He's not exactly a newbie.

Oct. 2013?....compared to us "semi old timers" he is....

 

[Maggot]

You jokers laugh all you want but that first training program is going to prepare me for extraterrestrial threats!

Cart, from watching your posts for the last few years Id guess you are well prepared for the ET's......... you've got your own army and all.

 

[Quinc]

What a bad ass!

 

[Cartman]

Cart, from watching your posts for the last few years Id guess you are well prepared for the ET's......... you've got your own army and all.

My army is a child army. And they make women's clothing in Honduran sweat-shops.

Moreover, I've recently learned I've been occasionally mistaken for forum members with names like "Eric Cartman" or some other variant. I have been, and remain, simply Cartman. Democrats and hippies do, however, piss me off.

That said, I am well prepared for both an alien invasion and the zombie apocalypse.

 

[Sean the Nailer]

" ..........Terrestrial or Extra-Terrestrial......"

what more needs to be said?

 

[Maggot]

,I've recently learned I've been occasionally mistaken for forum members with names like "Eric Cartman" or some other variant. I have been, and remain, simply Cartman.

I believe I may have gotten the man before the Cart. 1000 humble apologies.

 

[truth]

Dynamic Pie Concepts ~ The leader in tactical real world kinetic conceptual battlespace application of critical stress.

And of course pie.

Slicing and eating the pie.

 

[--BLACKOUT--]

Now these are the training videos I've been looking for! These are what is going to keep me alive when the SHTF, not those waste of money vids from Rifles Only and Lowlight.

 

[HardCorpsHunter]

Those are great! Will be sharing for sure.

 

[xdpatriot]

Dynamic Pie Concepts ~ The leader in tactical real world kinetic conceptual battlespace application of critical stress.

And of course pie.

Slicing and eating the pie.

Mmmmmmmmmmmm, pie.

 

[Sako man]

Dynamic Pie Concepts ~ The leader in tactical real world kinetic conceptual battlespace application of critical stress.

And of course pie.

Slicing and eating the pie.

Pretty awesome! Forget Magpull.

 

[Shanghai McCoy]

After watching those videos I think I will put all of my optics up for sale. I obviously won't need them anymore. Where does one find a tactical trash can to jump out of?

 

[truth]

After watching those videos I think I will put all of my optics up for sale. I obviously won't need them anymore. Where does one find a tactical trash can to jump out of?

Ask them yourself: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Dynamic-Pie-Concepts/162163230620405

 

[truth]

Tim Burke didn't find this funny at all. Dynamic Pie Concepts - 1911Forum Tim Burke thinks the interwebz is srsbzns.

 

[Centuriator]

No, apparently, Tim doesn't want his forum cluttered up with crap, that's his right. Don't like it? Don't use his forum. It's that simple.

 

[truth]

No, apparently, Tim doesn't want his forum cluttered up with crap, that's his right. Don't like it? Don't use his forum. It's that simple.

You sound like a really fun guy too.

 

[E. Bryant]

No, apparently, Tim doesn't want his forum cluttered up with crap, that's his right.

Oh, the irony...

 

[bogeybrown]

THIS is the shit you do on the range on your last day with your Agency/Unit and watch the Range Officer lose his mind.

Hell, when I'm home again I may pull some of this craziness on the P.D. range and just tell the range staff (buddies of mine) that "this is how they teach us HIGH SPEED contractors to do it overseas"

 

[bullseye13]

This exercise would be better suited with steel targets. I'm anxiously awaiting the video.

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

Oh, the irony...

I tried, and failed, to salvage some kind of serious discussion about tactics from the original post.

My original thinking was that we could all laugh at the videos and learn something from each other at the same time. The humor in those videos is built on common tactical stereotypes, which could make for a good discussion if we addressed and corrected some of those, with examples.

Of course, doing that would require the contribution of people who had a clue.

The way this Site is going lately, all most people want to do is post foolish pictures and add a "+1" or a "LMFAO". Probably because those people couldn't engage in a serious discussion of tactics if their life depended on it. Literally.

Darkside's knowledge of the relevant tactics could fill this Thread. It's too bad that we spend our time telling him things, like that he's a "NuB" and re-posting the date he joined this Site, instead of asking him things that we could learn from.

Oh well: Another loss to our community here. And another nail in the coffin of this Site.

 

[Bolt_Overide]

Not everything needs to be a serious discussion of weapons, tactics, or mindset. This whole subforum was setup with that in mind. If people cutting up and laughing at things that are plainly funny to those who do not have a stick up their ass bothers you, why the hell do you insist on coming back in here, repeatedly, and poopooing all over everything?

Now feel free to berate me with your large vocabulary about how poor my spelling, grammar and punctuation are. If that fails, you can always tell me how much of an arm chair commando I am, or how I make so much less money than you. I'm sure you'll find something that will help disguise your monumental self worth issues and desperate need to feel superior to others.

If that fails, you could always sue me for libel.

I tried, and failed, to salvage some kind of serious discussion about tactics from the original post.

My original thinking was that we could all laugh at the videos and learn something from each other at the same time. The humor in those videos is built on common tactical stereotypes, which could make for a good discussion if we addressed and corrected some of those, with examples.

Of course, doing that would require the contribution of people who had a clue.

The way this Site is going lately, all most people want to do is post foolish pictures and add a "+1" or a "LMFAO". Probably because those people couldn't engage in a serious discussion of tactics if their life depended on it. Literally.

Darkside's knowledge of the relevant tactics could fill this Thread. It's too bad that we spend our time telling him things, like that he's a "NuB" and re-posting the date he joined this Site, instead of asking him things that we could learn from.

Oh well: Another loss to our community here. And another nail in the coffin of this Site.

 

[truth]

All you need to know about my tactics is that I'm COMING AT YOU BRO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OPSEC bitch.

 

[Darkside-Six]

I tried, and failed, to salvage some kind of serious discussion about tactics from the original post.

Darkside's knowledge of the relevant tactics could fill this Thread. It's too bad that we spend our time telling him things, like that he's a "NuB" and re-posting the date he joined this Site, instead of asking him things that we could learn from.

You give me too much credit. I mearly watch all the Magpul video's and work on my urban prone so Haley would be proud.

but then again....I only finished the first half of disk 1, so......guess i'm a noob.

 

[Graham]

Come at me bro...

Not everything needs to be a serious discussion of weapons, tactics... If people cutting up and laughing at things that are plainly funny to those who do not have a stick up their ass bothers you, why the hell do you insist on coming back in here, repeatedly, and poopooing all over everything?

Now feel free to berate me with your large vocabulary about how poor my spelling, grammar and punctuation are. If that fails, you can always tell me how much of an arm chair commando I am, or how I make so much less money than you. I'm sure you'll find something that will help disguise your monumental self worth issues and desperate need to feel superior to others.

No berating you is necessary: You clearly have an agenda, and it's to make a personal attack. That speaks for itself.

I can only suggest that you read my post again: I didn't say we couldn't laugh and I didn't say that it bothered me.

You implied that I call people names, which I never do. And it's your buddy Maggot, not me, who brought up the issue of pay. You also made things up in order to invent some basis for criticizing me. Clearly your agenda is to pick a fight instead of to contribute to the Thread. You are a good example of the very negativity that you yourself criticize.

I simply thought that some people here, instead of spending bandwidth attacking others, would want to learn something as well. But I get it: In your case that's not the goal.

And usually that wouldn't be a problem, except that personal attacks are against the Board rules. So it's not really about Libel, it's about your reading comprehension.

 

[grayghost]

Yes CQB tactics are important. But if the bad guys are going to line up behind each other I would prefer to use the Mathew Quigley method

 

[Bolt_Overide]

Fair effort, I don't feel like you put the same passion into it that you do with maggot. The difference between you and maggot is, he makes no bones about being a dick, you however, try to hide behind intellectual superiority. If you were really the person you try to portray, you wouldn't have even felt my comments needed a response.

As for it being a personal attack, I suppose that's true in so far as my issue is entirely with you, and what you're doing.

No berating you is necessary: You clearly have an agenda, and it's to make a personal attack. That speaks for itself.

I can only suggest that you read my post again: I didn't say we couldn't laugh and I didn't say that it bothered me.

You implied that I call people names, which I never do. And it's your buddy Maggot, not me, who brought up the issue of pay. You also made things up in order to invent some basis for criticizing me. Clearly your agenda is to pick a fight instead of to contribute to the Thread. You are a good example of the very negativity that you yourself criticize.

I simply thought that some people here, instead of spending bandwidth attacking others, would want to learn something as well. But I get it: In your case that's not the goal.

And usually that wouldn't be a problem, except that personal attacks are against the Board rules. So it's not really about Libel, it's about your reading comprehension.