Someone should notify apd and Texas Rangers. Texas gov needs to be given time to do the right thing.
One protester shot and killed in Austin. Approached the wrong car with a rifle and the driver went 'hot.'
- Thread starter TexPatriot
- Start date
Is it just me or does some of this smell of paid commie troll?
Im not trying to sell you anything buddy.. If you have any conflicting info please share it otherwise stfu..
Joined July 16, 2020.
PLease read my welcome thread..
According to dead guy's fellow commie, his AK was at "low ready" and therefor not a threat.
Last edited:
Oh wow! Pardon me....I read another one of your threads that said you were a newbie to all this stuff.
Now that I've read your welcome thread, I know all about you. Thanks for clearing the air and setting us straight on your connections.
I fully understand also that you can't say too much, or you may have to kill us.
I'll take one info, please.
Was he wearing body armor? Looks like he has a vest on, but hard to tell.
The most damning thing I have seen thus far (if true) is his interview. This shows to me his intent was not "to keep the peace" but as an enforcer for the group disrupting traffic.
The most damning thing I have seen thus far (if true) is his interview. This shows to me his intent was not "to keep the peace" but as an enforcer for the group disrupting traffic.
You guys need some educating.. You keep using that word commie like you think you know what it means.. The guy clearly states he is not a part of antifa or blm and that they have been providing security for the protests as a group called the texas gorillas (look them up, dont read a news article either), who are mainly libertarians (which you un edumacated fucks seem to read as liberal) Libertarians stand for minimal government and our constitution.. Doesnt quite make them liberals or commies.. Now why would anyone stand to try and keep the peace at these events? Because an armed society is a polite society, right? Its not just for people who are protesting, its also to keep protesters in check. The phrase "I dont agree with what you say but Ill fight to defend your right to say it" is what this is about..
Jesus....
Official Garrett Foster Memorial Fund, organized by Patricia Kirven
Garrett Foster was murdered last night July 25th while attending a peaceful pro… Patricia Kirven needs your support for Official Garrett Foster Memorial Fundwww.gofundme.com
Tempted to troll the comments.
Im fairly confident all of this BS was ginned up to make a push for gun control! Been saying it since all of this started.
Looks like it’s low ready to me, it’s definitely not pointed at the driver but it’s not slung over the shoulder either, which I would take as a threat.
See post 212 above, then go find the interview with the stiff. His comments don’t exactly exhibit “peaceful” intent.
BTW, I never referred to him as a “commie”, but for the record, I really don’t give a fuck.
Last edited:
His interview suggests otherwise.
If I misunderstood the post, then I do apologize. I thought we were referring to the boogy boi in dress..
Ive seen IRL how some of you proficient operators work. Low ready is still very much fucking ready...lol.
If someone confronts a person in low ready, decisions must be made in fractions of a second.
If someone confronts a person in low ready, decisions must be made in fractions of a second.
His "interview" does not bode well for his intent and then his actions. He did not speak like a Libertarian. He spoke like Antifa. He used "they" and "we" when referencing the police and then the protesters, respectively, when complaining about being not allowed in the streets. Which they then go and do. And he's there pushing another protestor in her wheelchair.
That mob of trash are commies that would have no problem storming the Texas Capital if they could and will probably try, including toppling the statutes and the Goddess of Liberty that stands on top if they could get to her.
I'm not in the mood to debate that or argue semantics with you. Run along now.
No need to argue anything, but a problem spurs when you try to lump everyone together. The guys proving security for both the protesters and police alike are militia members, not demoncrats..
He's not providing security. He's actively protesting amongst them and tells the entire world on Twitter he's looking for a fight. And it's not the cops. So, what's being said of him and what he said of himself are conflicting. I'm gonna believe his words.
I hate that the hard left hijacked the term "liberal". There is nothing liberal about them.
What’s on the dead guys hat?
I dont know about the deceased enough to say one way or the other, but you may in fact be right.. But the boogie bois, their fight is with the atf and anyone trying to take away rights..
Retarded has liked your post. It seems he has redacted his stance on this? Confusing.
What do you think I am?
Conflating the deads guys right to bear arms with his actions isnt going to work either...
Just like who shot first...
I imagine the jury gets to decide, not us..
Interesting that a group interested in individual rights and freedoms joins up with a group that's led by self professed trained marxists...
Also weird that a so-called libertarian who values personal rights and freedoms decides to infringe on someone else's rights and freedoms, who was just trying to travel through...
Well that seems to be the debate, feel free to draw your own conclusions. I will warn you though, if your view isnt far right or separatist, you will be criticized here
Of course as it should be.
But his right to bear arms has nothing to do with his actions. That was my point. His actions were the result of his decisions.
No denying that. Thank you for being decent in your posts..
Considering the police will shoot you dead without hesitation if you approach them with what appears to be a loaded "assault rifle" in the "low ready" position, with your finger near the trigger, and the courts will instantly no bill it as, "In fear for their life", they are going to have a very hard time making the case that he was not in imminent fear for his life, unless they want to try to set a precedent the police will really regret.....
This ^^^.
The reality is they want to violently enforce their ideals on others.
News/videos are full of the proof.
R
I’ll get back to you on the Texas thing if and when they squash these fuckers quickly!
You wouldn't be peacefully protesting in the streets keeping people from their life liberty and pursuit of happiness. You are a terrorist when you block the vehicle thoroughfare by force, threat of violence etc.
Bingo.
I would think a libertarian would offer some consult here...
If you want to protest.
By all means protest.
Be as loud as you want.
Say whatever you want.
Carry if/how you want.
But once you cross into criminal behavior or impede with others free movement, threaten them, etc, welp...ya on your own.
So your saying a libertarian militia named guerrillas of Texas are providing security for marxist Antifa and BLM agitators?
If you have a gun, display it in a manor where the victim reasonably believes it to be a threat, you have all right to defend as necessary. Case law shows that you can't even get away with using a toy gun in a threatening manner.
Thats sort of how I took it as well.
Coming from a place where libertarians are fairly common, it doesnt seem to make much sense. But hey, here in the heart of fly over country we sorta call it like we see it
sides be damned. They have had time
and more liberals are going to buy AK’s and balaclavas for the next rally
While I don't agree with violating anyone's rights in any way, where's the line between rights and law, the law states that pedestrians have the right of way, in the video it appears they are Marching. So it can be argued that they are not impeding traffic. It could be argued that they are traveling as well. And the motor is not having the right of way honking and otherwise agitating the group could be misconstrued... food for thought
Similar threads
