• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

So apparently the German server thing is real. LOL someone explain how that went down

Merkel has long since sold her soul to the devil, like many "leaders" in Europe. She was at the dedication/opening of the Gotthard Base tunnel (see attached). Convince me that what you are witnessing is not pure evil. There is also another outdoor ceremony, also held in Erstfeld later in the day that is even more bizarre. If I can find it, I will post it up. I am surprised that this video still exists on Y/T.


I unknowingly went to some autistic spectacle like this once. I got a bunch of shitty looks for laughing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dirty D and Bender
News about a coup somewhere in the world

Somewhere on our planet, in some Third-World banana republic, a coup d'état is at work, to topple a legitimate government. Luckily for us, such a thing could never happen here.

It all happened according to historical precedents. The forces trying to usurp power used their total control over the media apparatus and broadcasting systems. They filled the airwaves with constant anti-government propaganda. In doing so they were able to distort the perception of reality and steer the opinion of the citizens during the coup. This did not happen overnight; these institutions were infiltrated over the course of many years, or even decades.

Meanwhile, on the streets, the junta's thugs assaulted citizens who did not comply with the new order. People were beaten, their property burnt. Lists were compiled of enemies of the new oligarchy. Deprived of information because of the media takeover, citizens found it hard to organize a resistance.

In an attempt to legitimize their takeover, the junta heads had organized a sham election. With the help of shady voting software and some blatant malpractice the new authorities gave their power grab a veneer of decency. Nobody really believed the results, but attempts to contest the legality of the polling methods were blocked by threatening lawyers who took the case to court. Citizens who spoke up were intimidated by agents of the new regime who had infiltrated the security forces.

The whole thing was years in the making. Decades ago, the new regime's agents infiltrated all institutions of higher learning, the civil service administrations and even the army. The entire power structure of the nation was compromised. Top military personnel even showed support for the new order in the months leading up to the "elections". Big business concerns gradually started sponsoring the usurpers over the years, sensing that doing so might protect them from direct assaults by the new regime and hoping that government support could help stifle their competition through decrees and protectionism.

We can only pray for the citizens of this unhappy nation. Thank God things like this are impossible here.
https://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/news-about-a-coup-somewhere-in-the-world-t22077.html
 
No but they do need money for penicillin.
on that tangent, i didn't know until recently that you could buy antibiotics for birds or other animals that are the same as we use (basically).
found out from prepper threads. if shtf and you or a family member gets an infection, will you be able to get a prescription?
 
on that tangent, i didn't know until recently that you could buy antibiotics for birds or other animals that are the same as we use (basically).
found out from prepper threads. if shtf and you or a family member gets an infection, will you be able to get a prescription?
Yup. The big 3 if you can find them are Penicillin, Doxycycline, and Ciprofloxacin. Between those 3 you have a really reallyyyyyyyy broad coverage of assorted bacteria.
 
Because of all the fake news that has been put forward on a number of social media sites as well as major media outlets, I have some questions about the alleged raid and seizure of servers.

1. What is the original source of the information that any raid was conducted?
2. Who is the source of the information. "A highly placed source" reeks of fake news.
3. As there are cell phone photos or movies of just about anything, why isn't there at least something showing the raid occurring? The lack of any photographic or video evidence is suspicious. I would certainly think that a military raid by US troops on foreign soil would prompt someone, somewhere to at least take one photo.
4. If servers were seized, who took ultimate custody of the seized servers, and where are they now?
5. Was whatever may have been seized by US troops ultimately turned over to another company or agency, and if so, which company or agency now has possession of the servers?
6. IF the servers were turned over to some company or agency, who is protecting the servers from a suspicious fire, gas explosion, or some other convenient excuse for why all the "evidence" is suddenly no longer available?

While I want to believe that someone, somewhere has solid evidence of manipulation of the 2020 presidential election, the reports of the US Army conducting a raid on foreign soil to seize servers, then the information about this "raid" suddenly going cold seems a little too convenient and suspicious.
 
Trump should have dumped Guilliani and his other re-election advisors, and hire the Presidents of Zimbabwe and Rwanda. Those guys know how to win an election. They get something like 95% of the votes. 🤔
 
Because of all the fake news that has been put forward on a number of social media sites as well as major media outlets, I have some questions about the alleged raid and seizure of servers.

1. What is the original source of the information that any raid was conducted?
the internet
2. Who is the source of the information. "A highly placed source" reeks of fake news.
germans
3. As there are cell phone photos or movies of just about anything, why isn't there at least something showing the raid occurring? The lack of any photographic or video evidence is suspicious. I would certainly think that a military raid by US troops on foreign soil would prompt someone, somewhere to at least take one photo.
no. nobody claimed a "raid by US troops". a server can be carried out by a couple guys in suits.
4. If servers were seized, who took ultimate custody of the seized servers, and where are they now?
see: epstein tapes
5. Was whatever may have been seized by US troops ultimately turned over to another company or agency, and if so, which company or agency now has possession of the servers?
top men.
6. IF the servers were turned over to some company or agency, who is protecting the servers from a suspicious fire, gas explosion, or some other convenient excuse for why all the "evidence" is suddenly no longer available?
it was handed over to a producer for the tucker carlson show for safe keeping

While I want to believe that someone, somewhere has solid evidence of manipulation of the 2020 presidential election, the reports of the US Army conducting a raid on foreign soil to seize servers, then the information about this "raid" suddenly going cold seems a little too convenient and suspicious.

see answers above in bold
 
see answers above in bold

Those are precisely the kind of answers that lead a great many people to believe reports about seizure of servers with anything more than someone's lunch menu on them is nothing more than fake news. There has been so much fake news over the past 6 years, that news outlets have lost most of the credibility they once had.

Any news stories attributed to "highly placed sources" or "reliable reports", or similar lead in statements have the same kind of credibility for me as would a 7 time convicted perjurer who starts his statement with "Now I'm gonna tell you the God's honest truth"..IOW no credibility whatsoever.

So, as for the alleged seizure of servers that may or may not have anything of significance on them, my feeling about them is: "YAWN,,, wake me up when something credible happens, or when someone actually goes to jail."
 
Those are precisely the kind of answers that lead a great many people to believe reports about seizure of servers with anything more than someone's lunch menu on them is nothing more than fake news. There has been so much fake news over the past 6 years, that news outlets have lost most of the credibility they once had.

Any news stories attributed to "highly placed sources" or "reliable reports", or similar lead in statements have the same kind of credibility for me as would a 7 time convicted perjurer who starts his statement with "Now I'm gonna tell you the God's honest truth"..IOW no credibility whatsoever.

So, as for the alleged seizure of servers that may or may not have anything of significance on them, my feeling about them is: "YAWN,,, wake me up when something credible happens, or when someone actually goes to jail."

My Son, with your decisive cognitive reason and logical position within this fun conjecture of internet threading, you have earned your freedom. I release you from your indentured bondage requirement to read further... go in peace.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jr81452
Those are precisely the kind of answers that lead a great many people to believe reports about seizure of servers with anything more than someone's lunch menu on them is nothing more than fake news. There has been so much fake news over the past 6 years, that news outlets have lost most of the credibility they once had.

Any news stories attributed to "highly placed sources" or "reliable reports", or similar lead in statements have the same kind of credibility for me as would a 7 time convicted perjurer who starts his statement with "Now I'm gonna tell you the God's honest truth"..IOW no credibility whatsoever.

So, as for the alleged seizure of servers that may or may not have anything of significance on them, my feeling about them is: "YAWN,,, wake me up when something credible happens, or when someone actually goes to jail."
are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?
the fact that we are not lends more credibility, not less.

you don't have to believe anything. that's the nice thing.

aqnpRvv_460s.jpg
 
are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?
the fact that we are not lends more credibility, not less.

you don't have to believe anything. that's the nice thing.

ohhhh.... stop it now LBC.... the news will tell us what to believe exactly when the proof is shown on the news. Once the msm show us the arrests and tell us what happened we will know. Until then, all this independent thinking, even if you admit clearly some turns out true and some not through further research....the news will tell us when the proof is proof... it is a threat to our democracy.......

..to our democracy

...to our democracy

....to our democracy

 

Twenty-two year intel veteran, Larry Johnson, confirmed that this seizure did occur and that specifically, Gina Haspel—CIA Chief—and Christopher Wray, the FBI Director-hack refusing to release documents proving that agency’s participation in the Russia Hoax, were unaware of this, by intent.


Here are Mr. Johnson’s own words:


The U.S. Army did not conduct a raid in Germany on either Sctyl or Dominion offices or servers. They are foreign nationals and we must operate in accordance with German law. Moreover, the U.S. Army does not have law enforcement powers with respect to such entities.


So what happened?


I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl. The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover. In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants.


Such an operation would have been carried out with U.S. law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence. That means that the evidence will be under the control of the Department of Justice through US Attorneys and can be used in court or other judicial proceedings.
 
Because of all the fake news that has been put forward on a number of social media sites as well as major media outlets, I have some questions about the alleged raid and seizure of servers.

1. What is the original source of the information that any raid was conducted?
2. Who is the source of the information. "A highly placed source" reeks of fake news.
3. As there are cell phone photos or movies of just about anything, why isn't there at least something showing the raid occurring? The lack of any photographic or video evidence is suspicious. I would certainly think that a military raid by US troops on foreign soil would prompt someone, somewhere to at least take one photo.
4. If servers were seized, who took ultimate custody of the seized servers, and where are they now?
5. Was whatever may have been seized by US troops ultimately turned over to another company or agency, and if so, which company or agency now has possession of the servers?
6. IF the servers were turned over to some company or agency, who is protecting the servers from a suspicious fire, gas explosion, or some other convenient excuse for why all the "evidence" is suddenly no longer available?

While I want to believe that someone, somewhere has solid evidence of manipulation of the 2020 presidential election, the reports of the US Army conducting a raid on foreign soil to seize servers, then the information about this "raid" suddenly going cold seems a little too convenient and suspicious.

These are excellent questions.

What a difference it would make if this same level of scrutiny/standard was used by the media regarding the "trump dossier"...

Or...

If this level of reasoning was used to actually safe-guard the elections in the first place....

And yet, when convenient...none of the above matters. Because truth is what the media says it is. Standards only matter to one side. Standards met, are only applicable to one side.

Wonder why that is?

Buried at sea....
 
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC
“The most suspicious data point in the Smartmatic system was that the machines contacted the server before printing their results, providing the opportunity, at least, to change the results...”



CARACAS' VIEW OF SMARTMATIC AND ITS VOTING MACHINES
Date:
2006 July 10, 18:01 (Monday)
Canonical ID:
06CARACAS2063_a
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
I think, ill take the lefts approach on this one. They are owed one for the pee dossier...

Prove the raid didnt happen. What, you mean you cant prove it didnt happen?

Well then, you conspiracy-nut whack-job.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC
Here in lies the problem, the "RESULTS" of the election as determined by who?

So just because mainstream media is reporting "who won", we should just accept it and move on? Yes, mainstream media has never lied to the American public or tried to push an agenda as determined by their Puppet Masters. No election party or officials have ever altered or misreported the results of the election. The TV says Biden won, there is nothing else to see, move on and accept it!

After the Trump legal team showed multiple pieces of EVIDENCE supporting all types of ELECTION FRAUD at their press conference, the nightly news channels all reported quote "Giuliani declined to provide reporters with any evidence to backup his allegations".

Are you really kidding me!!!

Do you understand how the election process actually works? Last time I checked, there are no "results" until:
- One party concedes (didn't happen for a good reason)
- The Electoral College casts their votes (has not happened)
- Legal challenges have been exhausted (still a long way to go)

The fact that you are willing to accept the RESULTS speaks volumes, because it puts you in the same category as all of the other mindless sheeple out there! BAAAAAHHH!!!

The outcome of the election is over, if like you, we all just choose to accept whatever mainstream media reports. Thank God there are people unlike you who are not willing to accept it and are demanding that everything be fully investigated to get to the truth.

At this point, there is SO MUCH evidence put forth of fraud, it cannot all be baseless or false. If there is smoke, you don't just ignore it, you find out where it is coming from and what is causing it. If you ignore the smoke, don't be surprised when the forest suddenly explodes into flames around you!

KEEP UP THE FIGHT, the TRUTH has to come out!!!
Amen
 
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC
are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?
the fact that we are not lends more credibility, not less.

you don't have to believe anything. that's the nice thing.

aqnpRvv_460s.jpg

I don't intend to be snarky, so please forgive me if my response seems that way...but in response to your question "Are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?"

I'm still trying to find some news outlets that don't put out fake news. I gave up on all the major ones, including Fox News, and lately I have been watching BBC, NHK (Japan), and Newsmax...but I don't even trust them. BBC has become so ultra liberal the only reason they are of interest is that they carry stories about other parts of the world that never make it to the US news outlets.

I'm old enough to remember when journalists were horrifically embarrassed and it could be even be a career ending issue if they ever reported on a story that was even close to false, fake, or even misleading.
 
I don't intend to be snarky, so please forgive me if my response seems that way...but in response to your question "Are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?"

I'm still trying to find some news outlets that don't put out fake news. I gave up on all the major ones, including Fox News, and lately I have been watching BBC, NHK (Japan), and Newsmax...but I don't even trust them. BBC has become so ultra liberal the only reason they are of interest is that they carry stories about other parts of the world that never make it to the US news outlets.

I'm old enough to remember when journalists were horrifically embarrassed and it could be even be a career ending issue if they ever reported on a story that was even close to false, fake, or even misleading.
That shit died a long time ago.
Now the game is overload information to hide pieces of the truth in plain sight.

R
 
I don't intend to be snarky, so please forgive me if my response seems that way...but in response to your question "Are you seeing this on the fake news outlets?"

I'm still trying to find some news outlets that don't put out fake news. I gave up on all the major ones, including Fox News, and lately I have been watching BBC, NHK (Japan), and Newsmax...but I don't even trust them. BBC has become so ultra liberal the only reason they are of interest is that they carry stories about other parts of the world that never make it to the US news outlets.

I'm old enough to remember when journalists were horrifically embarrassed and it could be even be a career ending issue if they ever reported on a story that was even close to false, fake, or even misleading.
one america news.
they are not saying it is real, but at least they are covering it.
btw, lou dobbs and the evening edition have been good so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
If there is a giant conspiracy going on including the MSM? They can’t stop now, they are all in. There’s No way out till the hammer drops. It’s all or nothing for them.
 
Those are precisely the kind of answers that lead a great many people to believe reports about seizure of servers with anything more than someone's lunch menu on them is nothing more than fake news. There has been so much fake news over the past 6 years, that news outlets have lost most of the credibility they once had.

Any news stories attributed to "highly placed sources" or "reliable reports", or similar lead in statements have the same kind of credibility for me as would a 7 time convicted perjurer who starts his statement with "Now I'm gonna tell you the God's honest truth"..IOW no credibility whatsoever.

So, as for the alleged seizure of servers that may or may not have anything of significance on them, my feeling about them is: "YAWN,,, wake me up when something credible happens, or when someone actually goes to jail."

In agreement with most except this...

"YAWN,,, wake me up when something credible happens, or when someone actually goes to jail."

Complatency isnt the solution. This isnt an accusation by the way so please do not take it as such. As having honest and open discourse is exactly whats needed. Even if after all is said and done you are proven wrong, there is no shame imo....again not you specifically

This is why the big 3's monopoly on facts versus truth is so concerning. When people cant ask open questions, we are truely fucked. But salty some of this stuff is plain crazy...

Yes it is LoL, but imo you have to have common sense filters and discern some of this yourself. Reliance on a nanny to do this for you/us isnt going to lead anywhere good imo and may even compound the issue.

Yeah but salty the crazy stuff may influence people and we have to have some basline of providing facts.

Maybe, but its a slippery slope (i hate those). again, reliance on facts to be provided/dictated to you/us actually compounds the problem imo. This is one way mistrust and conspiracy is born and propogates.

My facts? Trust in the media has never been lower at any point in history.

What a strange time we live in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
No video? No pictures? Then it wasn't the US Army. No way. There's also something about it being a big deal to roll around armed in another country showing your ass and giving orders.

Trust me, if they want you to know about it, it's not worth knowing about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DIBBS
So when the "real" info" is ready to come out is it not possible for POTUS to use a presidential authority to use the broadcast networks to inform the nation?? That way there's no censoring or at least it's going to be limited to the extent the networks cut off the feed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DIBBS
No video? No pictures? Then it wasn't the US Army. No way. There's also something about it being a big deal to roll around armed in another country showing your ass and giving orders.

Trust me, if they want you to know about it, it's not worth knowing about.
again, it wasn't the army. they would have no jurisdiction. it is explained above who took control of the "server".
i could walk into the building (if i had access), power down the VMs and take snapshots of them (copies), power them back up, backup the DBs and transaction logs, and put it all on a portable drive(s) in a matter of hours. techincally, i don't even have to power down a VM to take a snapshot, but depending on why you need the snapshot, it can be necessary to power it down.
 
So when the "real" info" is ready to come out is it not possible for POTUS to use a presidential authority to use the broadcast networks to inform the nation?? That way there's no censoring or at least it's going to be limited to the extent the networks cut off the feed.
No, that can't happen. The president is still Bound by a certain nondisclosure.

It's kind of like the president having evidence of Bin Laden's double being shot and not him or evidence of aliens... Certain information is just not going to come out.

As this might relate to the Army, the Army does work all the time with various agencies. Sometimes they're merely a taxi cab
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeavyAssault
Salty,
I'm not at all that complacent about what is currently going on, or what has been going on by the democrats for the past 3.75 years. I think they have been deceitful, and disruptive in the extreme, all to the detriment of both the operation of government, and the lives of the American people.

Now that the democrats contend that Biden has won, they are all of a sudden asking for cooperation. It is interesting that for the past 3.75 years, the democrats were the polar opposite of cooperation, and NOW they want everyone else to forget their past misdeeds and play nice.

I just wish a few of the republicans would remind them of how they behaved for the past 3.75 years and tell them openly that the republicans plan on using the very plays and behavior the democrats have exhibited during Trump's tenure. Let them know they taught the other party well, and we thank them for letting us know the sort of behavior that is to be expected.

I'm terribly jaded and disappointed in both political parties, but I don't know how to fix things peaceably, so I try and hold my tongue.
 
No, that can't happen. The president is still Bound by a certain nondisclosure.

It's kind of like the president having evidence of Bin Laden's double being shot and not him or evidence of aliens... Certain information is just not going to come out.

As this might relate to the Army, the Army does work all the time with various agencies. Sometimes they're merely a taxi cab

I agree but I was referring along the lines of the information that might be released about the whole thing.
 
Salty,
I'm not at all that complacent about what is currently going on, or what has been going on by the democrats for the past 3.75 years. I think they have been deceitful, and disruptive in the extreme, all to the detriment of both the operation of government, and the lives of the American people.

Now that the democrats contend that Biden has won, they are all of a sudden asking for cooperation. It is interesting that for the past 3.75 years, the democrats were the polar opposite of cooperation, and NOW they want everyone else to forget their past misdeeds and play nice.

I just wish a few of the republicans would remind them of how they behaved for the past 3.75 years and tell them openly that the republicans plan on using the very plays and behavior the democrats have exhibited during Trump's tenure. Let them know they taught the other party well, and we thank them for letting us know the sort of behavior that is to be expected.

I'm terribly jaded and disappointed in both political parties, but I don't know how to fix things peaceably, so I try and hold my tongue.
kayleigh's last press conference outlined your sentiment to the T.
from before the election (framing trump for collusion), to refusing to attend the address (70 of them), to backfire hurricane and muellergate and the sham impeachment....

what fucking peaceful transition did trump get? fucking lying asshole hypocrites. (excuse my french if you're religious).

the reason more of the top of the gop aren't saying schiff is that they probably knew about it and did nothing as long as they kept their seats (even when hundreds of millions is spent to unseat them). cocaine mitch? lindsey graham? where are you? why aren't you already investigating?
 
I agree but I was referring along the lines of the information that might be released about the whole thing.
it would be like turning on the lights in a roach infected kitchen. when schiff hits the fan for real, everything must be in the courts, not leaked out and giving the perps time to flee or destroy anymore existing evidence.
 
It’s funny when people try to say elite satanic billionaire clubs don’t exist. They just put on a full occult display for the financiers of that tunnel there.
CERN does some biblically weird ass shit too. Check em out

Yep. Yall may not believe in Almighty God, but they certainly do....and they are not on his team.
Better pick a side.
BTW....the good guys win at the end....it is written. The bad guys pay the ultimate price for an eternity.
 
I agree but I was referring along the lines of the information that might be released about the whole thing.
You'll never get the whole thing. That was kind of the point... at least in my old feeble-mind.

Often there are off the books contract related, pick a service, actions that happen all over the world. It's just something that isn't well advertised. And rightfully so. If people found out how the world really works there would be a meltdown religiously, economically and politically.
 
What if the military didn't take them from Gemans? What if the CIA was operating covertly from some location in Germany and the military went in and seized them from the CIA?

What if we essentially took them from "ourselves".
That is most likely, US has plenty of folks, companies in Germany,if it was taken at all not just downloaded its was done by US operatives or contractors from US operatives or contractors and not some fantasy Bourne types but by a nerd with pimples and no facial hair .

But it can also be just a bunch of hot air that never happened.
 
So when the "real" info" is ready to come out is it not possible for POTUS to use a presidential authority to use the broadcast networks to inform the nation?? That way there's no censoring or at least it's going to be limited to the extent the networks cut off the feed.
I don't think so, they are private corporations...remember just recently Trump held a briefing and all major networks except Fox just cut him off...
 
FEMA, FCC and NOAA control the Emergency Broadcast system. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a national public warning system that allows the president to address the American people within 10 minutes during a national emergency. The FCC licenses all the broadcasters, so if the FCC wants to break in, they better let them if they want to keep their license.
 
Hmm, in this post, lin wood seems to specifically mention the servers...


I am not sure he would say as much so definitively and so casually without knowing something.

The alarming part, and people should prepare (should have for a while now) is the voilence in the streets. If this turns to be true (i repeat, if), i am not sure people realize/comprehend the amount of fuckery thats going to spill into the streets. The riots thus far will pale in comparison...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirty D
I have a lot of "cautious optimism" about all of this.

It makes me sick to think that Biden and Harris are going to potentially head up the next administration. I think their platform and proposed policies are horrendous, though when you look and see who Biden is picking to be in his cabinet, I don't think much is really going to change. Just the same chrony corruption that our government has been pulling off for years. Though his threats of using a lot of executive orders on day #1 is not promising.

On the flip side, IF massive voter fraud was perpetrated and exposed, then what does that mean for our country? That's going to have huge ramifications, and will change this country forever. How does that get dealt with? How will we restore faith in our election process to the electorate?

Either way, I don't think the outcome is going to be great.

Often times, the cures for chronic sicknesses like long term election fraud are a little worse than the underlying sickness, at least in the early stages of the cure. Woe to those that chose not to prepare for the aftermath of the cure. If 75-80% of the citizens really voted for Trump, any violent protesting should be isolated to the big democrat hell hole cities. As far as I'm concerned, the limousine liberals and their useful idiots that live in such places can eat each other.
 
I don't think so, they are private corporations...remember just recently Trump held a briefing and all major networks except Fox just cut him off...

You need to review history. I'm certain that there is POTUS authority that allows for the White House Communication Agency to take control of the national broadcast stations to allow the POTUS to address that nation. Now it may need to be some sort of national emergency or other event.........think about it. As well as the Emergency Alert System...

Emergency Alert System
  • The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a national public warning system that allows the president to address the American people within 10 minutes during a national emergency.