Full size. But I tell her it's just the tip.
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
- Tags
Oh, now Newsmax is bad too? When are you all just going to settle on listening to nothing but conspiracy theories on social media and the crazy voices inside your head?
You do realize they haven't actually passed the covid relief bill yet right (it will likely pass)?
The most alarming thing I read was a amendment that would not allow court packing was defeated on a 50-50 vote. That may be a foreshadowing of what is to come.
It's probably not foreshadowing. They will always block resolutions like that.
Yeah I realize it hasnt been fully implemented but it will be.
I suspect it contains all the money requested to bail out the blue cities for years of bad policy.
Florida, Wyoming, Idaho and others will be making Chitcago, New York and etc solvent.
Also loaded with BS to kill jobs.
Hey, its not like we didnt know this was coming.
My hope is dim but Im hanging on to Arizonas audit being so shocking people want to look at the election again, the supposed Gateway Pundits new evidence being substantial or even people waking up and looking at what is going on in the upstate New York congressional race.
Not that optimistic but hanging on.
Well done analysis of the capital shooting. Check out the angle of the handgun during discharge vs the "impact" of the woman's neck.
I hope so but...let's see what happens when SCOTUS blocks something they want to accomplish.
No Newsmax refuses to do any journalism.
If there is an idea out there at least do some work and address it.
Ill give OAN credit in that they at least are willing to address shit and dedicate blocks to a "special" that considers issues.
Sure they put their slant on it but they at least give air to the other side of the coin.
If NM was journalistic, if any MSM was journalistic, they would have a segment showing "This is what is being expressed to be fraudulent, here is the reason it is not"
None of these people have done anything to refute what "Stop the Steal" is presenting.
Why havent we seen one explanation from the left why a tool such as Benfords Law that our own State Dept uses to check for fraud got it wrong in this case?
Just telling 75 million to shut up and accept the result is unacceptable.
Wont happen.
We will get the old default message "The Court doesnt want to become a policy making body. If there is objection to legislative policy the remedy is the voter"
That of course is currently very dusty as they have not functioned in that manner for the last administration. They were only too happy to legislate during the Trump admin.
The Benford's Law conspiracy has been so thoroughly discredited. Of course, it had been discredited as a means for finding election fraud long ago, see Cambridge Paper in 2011, but even moreso given the two party system and precinct divisions in the US. Basically, given the structure of our system, Benford's Law would no longer expect an excess of 1s, but an excess of 4, 5 and 6s given average precinct size of 1000.
And, for what it is worth, we always ask the losing side to accept election results. I voted for Trump just like you, I am just not willing to dive down the rabbit hole on the basis of crankery.
Edit: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/inapB.pdf from one of the few people left who thinks Benford's Law is generally applicable to voting. Most experts do not and haven't for a long time.
Not going to happen but if it does I'll be jumping up and down with joy and eat so much crow I'll shit out a reincarnated Ted Hughes.
They weren't willing to act on and possibly decide an election. It was not the outcome you me and everyone else wanted but I can at least grasp why they didn't. It would set forth a precedent that could (probably would) damage future elections (which may be fraudulent already anyway)
Let us see how they act on other topics presented before them. I am not ready to cast them off yet...time will tell.
You are only talking about the most recent outrage.
The Roberts Court refuses to do its Constitutionally mandated job while its willing to perform judicial gymnastics to make the UnConstitutional....Constitutional.
Our Country has been totally fucked in the past. If we survive this the review of our present politics will be written as a very dark historical period.
Here is the story and the vid. I am sure Choid can explain this easily.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Exclusive: The TCF Center Election Fraud - Newly Discovered Video Shows Late Night Deliveries of Tens of Thousands of Illegal Ballots 8 Hours After Deadline | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
By Cassandra Fairbanks and Jim Hoft On Tuesday, November 3rd President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden in the swing state of Michigan by over 100,000 votes. This appeared to be another solid win for President Trump in Michigan with a greater margin than his 2016 victory.
www.thegatewaypundit.com Huh?
Here is the story and the vid. I am sure Choid can explain this easily.
Exclusive: The TCF Center Election Fraud - Newly Discovered Video Shows Late Night Deliveries of Tens of Thousands of Illegal Ballots 8 Hours After Deadline | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
By Cassandra Fairbanks and Jim Hoft On Tuesday, November 3rd President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden in the swing state of Michigan by over 100,000 votes. This appeared to be another solid win for President Trump in Michigan with a greater margin than his 2016 victory.
Here's Choid explaining it for us
I said it won't happen (overturning election). If it does I'll eat crow...Ted Hughes wrote Crow. Bad attempt at humor.
I agree, but let's see what happens.
How many of these things need to be debunked, how many theories, like Benford's law, need to be shown to be wildly misapplied, how many "expert testimonies" need to be shown to be fakers? If something comes up that is actual evidence of fraud, great, but as of yet, it has been nothing but a big grift that has ended up hurting conservatism, and this country, an almost unfathomable amount.
And no, the answer is not that I am a Biden supporter. You were in threads pre election where I was arguing with Libertarians that they needed to suck it up and vote for Trump. This is about the importance of dealing in reality, not in garbage brain conspiracy theories aggregated by people without the ability to understand why they are garbage.
This is, frankly, silly. What the "Roberts Court" did when Roberts was the swing vote has no predictive value for what the Roberts Court will do when Roberts is not a swing vote. The Chief Justice is very limited in most ways, and the change from the rulings in favor of draconian restrictions to against them is pretty good proof. It's like saying you know how a football team will play based on last year, even if the roster is dramatically different.
FFS
I guess if one labels anything a conspiracy theory it should be dead to the world.
Programming has been successful.
Here are some crazy conspiracy theories.
J&J selling baby powder for decades knowing the effects it may have on consumers.
The Johns company making everything fireproof, they invented asbestos.
The humongous fucking cigarette companies.
Etc,etc...
I guess only those evil companies/capitalists really are active in conspiracies
Not our benevolent Government.
EL OH EL
Scrutiny is good, using buzzword labels is intellectually lazy.
I wonder who would benefit from being able to label anything they would
like you not to see or believe a "conspiracy theory"?
R
I guess if one labels anything a conspiracy theory it should be dead to the world.
Programming has been successful.
Here are some crazy conspiracy theories.
J&J selling baby powder for decades knowing the effects it may have on consumers.
The Johns company making everything fireproof, they invented asbestos.
The humongous fucking cigarette companies.
Etc,etc...
I guess only those evil companies/capitalists really are active in conspiracies
Not our benevolent Government.
EL OH EL
Scrutiny is good, using buzzword labels is intellectually lazy.
I wonder who would benefit from being able to label anything they would
like you not to see or believe a "conspiracy theory"?
R
Two points. First, they are not legal opinions, they are statements of fact. Second of all, you people should, since every time since this election, I have been right and you all have been wrong. I am not talking about debated points. I am talking about what is going to happen. Every damn time.
Excuse me. The second paragraph was opinion, though not legal opinion. The first paragraph was statements of fact. The experts have turned out to be charlatans, or at least not qualified in the ways they claim, the use of things like Benford's law has been widely shown to be inappropriately used. The government insiders were temporary cleaning help, the crypto experts were, well, not, the hack of the Dominion system was not a hack. It has all been shown to be grift.
Anent Benford's Law, it is pretty fucking easy to understand the inapplicability here. Average precinct size in the US is 1000, give or take. Assume two data sets, Trump voters and Biden voters, in every precinct. If you distribute one in accordance with Benfords law, the second necessarily has to be the inverse. In other words, if 30% of precincts show Biden votes starting with 1, then 30% of precincts will show Trump votes starting with 8 or 9, which in and of itself violates the prescription that a total of 9% of outcomes should be in those later two deciles. It is easy to understand that in an artificially limited population, given two possible choices, the outcomes will likely look more like a bell curve, though a skewed one, with the highest frequency being toward the median number. It isn't hard, you don't even need to understand the math behind it. You just need some critical thinking skills.
Appreciate the first information I have seen trying to explain why this "constant" would not apply here.
All the same it seems odd to me that the exception to its utility is specifically the Trump/Biden election.
Good to formulate hard policy in Iran, Russia, the Ukraine but to be dismissed in the Biden win.
Why wouldnt a county when viewed as an individual whole follow the numbers?
What is the Benford flow for the country?
Why does the left not take the joy in making argument in proving Stop the Steal wrong in order to more enjoy their victory?
Why is Maricopa County being threatened with arrest in resisting the state legislatures call for forensic audit?
What is to hide while missing the chance to dance on Trumps political grave?
Okay....clear now, received.
I explained above the exception to its utility. The issue is in a binary choice situation with artificially limited and equalized n data sets. I can't answer the other questions other than to say that it has been discredited in general as a tool for use in election fraud cases. And it was never used as proof, only as a detection method. A first step. But it hasn't been considered a good formula for this since 2011.
My guess as far as why the left isn't fighting back on this is the old adage that while your opponent is beating himself, the correct move is to stay the fuck out of the way. We last saw this in the US in the great Kenyan debacle. Obama simply did not respond, and gained votes by not doing so because people were disgusted with the spectacle. It is good strategy, which seems to be the hallmark of the Democratic party, and certainly not of the Republican party.
The President/Solicitor General argue for one thing and than Roberts redefines their argument to be Constitutionally legislated stating what is said in the heat of the debate has no bearing because he was able to figure out what they really meant and he could state it so that it would be Constitutional........BS!
Like I said, with Roberts as the swing vote you get one thing, but with Roberts as not the swing vote, the calculus changes. This is not a difficult concept. Roberts could move to the left of Sotomayor and how he voted still wouldn't matter as long as Kavanaugh was to the right of Roberts.
The only tool Roberts currently has to move the court left is to move himself to the right. When he is in the majority he gets to assign writings. When he is in the minority, Clarence Thomas does.
Yeah pal? Just wait til they release the Kraken! Any day now. You'll see!
Based on all of Trumps appointments and who they were reported to be vs who they turned out to be I doubt anyone of the three will be right of Roberts and packing the court will be un-necessary.
Our only friends are fragments from a bygone era Thomas and Alito.
The commies wont let "ego" deny them a court pick.
If Sotomayer doesnt watch her diabetes, Kagan doesnt stop eating pizza or in Breyers case he actually shows signs of life........they will be brought into a meeting and told their last day on the court and who their replacement will be.
No one will be given the deference of Ginsburg should it risk another admin getting to pick the replacement.
As long as Roberts is CJ, they won't have to pack the court. Remember, the SCOTUS does not have to hear a case. It's an elective that can be weaponized. We've seen it in the recent past, no reason to believe it won't be used in the future.
So the Bush judges are the good guys? Interesting.
IMO, Gorsuch and ACB are solid. Kavanaugh is much less so. The only place anybody faults Gorsuch is on the meaning of sex case, which was debatable, and both, I suppose, on not hearing Texas, which was a total pig in the first place. Even Thomas and Alito only thought it should be heard based on a strong belief they have on original jurisdiction.
The second part of your statement belies the first, btw. If Trumps judges are no better than the liberals, then why would the liberals care so much?
It takes four to hear a case, five to decide it. Roberts has no special bearing on that.
It is interesting....a time of transition and a testing of how fast will we rush to the cliff.
The world is no longer BC/AD, Its not even BCE/CE.
Its pre 9/11 - post 9/11.
Id give both nuts to freeze the world on 9/10/2001.
Everything since than was an incremental outrage.
Since the initiators of all that came after are starting to realize their recall to Hell fast approaches and that Trump had to delay their plans by 4 years the need for speed has been even more accelerated.
This was supposed to be done with in 2017.
They fear that any more delay will allow too many to smell the BS and the time is now. They realize the fragility of their position and that is why troops still ring DC.
I bet Alito and Thomas get weekly if not daily invites for bird hunting in a Texas ranch.
The last obstacle will be our collective reaction when this starts.....
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
The time to decide seems to be fast approaching........Who wants to be Solzhenitsyn or Niemoller?
the Kraken was released on OANN this morning. anyone else see it?
lindell (my pillow) put a presentation together, ending with mary fanning and a summary of what @Bolo told us already, because he was part of the team that caught the bad guys.
they have terabytes of network traces that shows every connection from nov. 2 until after the election.
they have the source and target IP and ID for each connection, with timestamp, method of entry, if they were successful, and what they did.
more than 60% of the connections from china.
you need to watch it. i will post if i can find it and i am not getting banned by posting a new thread.
rip marc
lindell (my pillow) put a presentation together, ending with mary fanning and a summary of what @Bolo told us already, because he was part of the team that caught the bad guys.
they have terabytes of network traces that shows every connection from nov. 2 until after the election.
they have the source and target IP and ID for each connection, with timestamp, method of entry, if they were successful, and what they did.
more than 60% of the connections from china.
you need to watch it. i will post if i can find it and i am not getting banned by posting a new thread.
rip marc
But tell me it aint true.
9/11 happened and our reaction was way overboard and abusive to our liberties.
Shit replace "9/11" with CV19 in the above sentence........untrue?
Im not suggesting conspiracy shit.
Im saying shit happened "someone did something" and we paid a heavy price perhaps greater than the initial outrage.
Saw OANN last night promote that coming out. I think its like 3 hours long if I heard right.
ASGH?
Regards MW for no other reason than the price his relative, my states official hero, paid on on 4/19/1775 he should be brought back on board.
He may not be Samuel Whittemore but the DNA is there.
Last edited:
I think it is true to some degree. The last time I found myself at such odds with other conservatives was around the Patriot Act and Iraq. I was called a commie back then too...
Without reference to the awful perpetrators, it was a brilliant attack and changed the course of our history. We reacted incorrectly. I actually believe we acted in good faith, but it was an emotional reaction not based on reason. It is worth noting, however, that those who voted against the Patriot Act, and were correct, are card carrying members of the current "cabal." As long as you are not suggesting a conspiracy, I have no problem with your analysis, though while I am generally a Solzhenitsyn fan, I do not necessarily agree that we are where that quote applied to today suggests we are. We are someplace bad, but there are many levels of bad, and we ain't there yet. Hopefully we never get there.
Wait a second.. gayguns is dead? Is that what yall are saying?
no, he might just be absent from this forum. i don't think we are supposed to discuss these sorts of things so that is all i can say.
The only 'conspiracy theory' are when you Biden supporters put your fingers in your ears and yell 'Lalalalala' when confronted with hard evidence and proof of election fraud and conspire to cover it up by calling it a 'conspiracy theory'. Thats the only conspiracy.
How does it feel to be a brainwashed useful idiot for a criminal, low IQ, pedophile idiot?
Similar threads
