• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

PortaJohn

Mathematically, Id prefer to say its more like a series or a "complex" function...

In which no term alone defines the overall series/function behavior.

Simply, there is a more complete picture when all the "circumstances" are taken as a whole.

Indeed, maths is maths.
 
Mathematically, Id prefer to say its more like a series or a "complex" function...

In which no term alone defines the overall series/function behavior.

Simply, there is a more complete picture when all the "circumstances" are taken as a whole.

Indeed, maths is maths.
If you are talking about Benford's law, it is an observation about infinite series, or more specifically an infinite number of sequences of unknown lengths. It is not applicable to arbitrarily chosen small numbers. It is controversial to say that in a population of 900 addresses, starting at one hundred and going to 1000, you would necessarily have 11.1% of addresses starting with each number 1-9. Likewise, it is non controversial that in the entire population of addresses you are likely to see a Benford distribution because of the reasons I state above. That doesn't mean that the 900 address group above violates Benfords law, it means Benford's law isn't applicable, just as it isn't applicable to predetermined precincts of 1000 people.
 
I think Biden's approval rating of less than 50% after supposedly winning the election with over 80 millions votes speaks volumes to me. This coming from the MSM who has favored Biden at every turn. How low do you think his actual approval rating is?

I take no pleasure in saying that the USA will be a shell of itself before the 2024 elections.
 
I think Biden's approval rating of less than 50% after supposedly winning the election with over 80 millions votes speaks volumes to me. This coming from the MSM who has favored Biden at every turn. How low do you think his actual approval rating is?

I take no pleasure in saying that the USA will be a shell of itself before the 2024 elections.
I think 45 percent of the country would approve of a democrat even if they raped a puppy on live tv.
 
If that were a good analogy, then it would be more convincing. But it isn't.
If your reply had any less content, it would just be a blank post.

It shouldn't have been called "ObamaCare". It should have been called RomneyCare. And it was, in Massachusetts.

It wasn't some douchebag Democrat who wrote the Patriot Act.

The Republicans DON'T roll back the legislation we want them to...even when they are in power and have complete control. Because if both parties destroyed existing legislation as part of the mandate-swapping it would actually help us some. That will never happen.

If you plotted the destruction of individual liberty/American financial soundness, and encroachment of the bureaucracy I bet the chart wouldn't dip even a little during any Presidency since 1934.

-----

All that said, the CA AWB rolling through the 9th Circuit right now should be watched. It may revive my faith in our system. Or crush it utterly.

The Constitution was meant to be applied under strict scrutiny not 'whatever-the-fuck-we-want-ism.'
 
If your reply had any less content, it would just be a blank post.

It shouldn't have been called "ObamaCare". It should have been called RomneyCare. And it was, in Massachusetts.

It wasn't some douchebag Democrat who wrote the Patriot Act.

The Republicans DON'T roll back the legislation we want them to...even when they are in power and have complete control. Because if both parties destroyed existing legislation as part of the mandate-swapping it would actually help us some. That will never happen.

If you plotted the destruction of individual liberty/American financial soundness, and encroachment of the bureaucracy I bet the chart wouldn't dip even a little during any Presidency since 1934.

-----

All that said, the CA AWB rolling through the 9th Circuit right now should be watched. It may revive my faith in our system. Or crush it utterly.

The Constitution was meant to be applied under strict scrutiny not 'whatever-the-fuck-we-want-ism.'
It wasn't meant to have content. It was meant to be appropriately dismissive of a bad analogy. Using the same format, I would suggest this one. I see a major difference between being ass raped nightly for four years, and being inappropriately touched once in a while.

So do I think Republicans are perfect, or even very good, of course not. They aren't. But I don't think that means there is no difference. I think that a four year pause in bad legislation really is worth something, even if it is not as good as repeal. But I am pragmatic in that way.

To your other points, Romneycare in MA is different from Obamacare for two reasons. First, I believe that the proper reading of the Constitution gives states much more leeway than the federal government for various laws and programs, and second I think that in MA it served as a moderate alternative to what the population wanted vs in the US it was not at all what the population wanted and far too radical. In the same vein, take Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. While they vote almost identically, Collins is an outstanding senator and Murkowski is a joke. Why? Because Collins is far better than anybody else we could get from Maine, and Murkowski is far worse than anybody else we could get from Alaska. It is similar to the idea in baseball of wins above replacement value. The MA example vs Obamacare can be seen similarly.

I agree about the Patriot Act. I have written that many times. I was the only Republican I knew who thought it was a bad idea back then, and was generally called a commie for that just as I am in here for some opinions. Plus ca change.

I am not sure strict scrutiny was even a glimmer in the founders eye. I think they believed that these rights were not negotiable, but it is undeniably true that, at least since Marbury v Madison, which included signers on every level of the case, the courts have self arrogated powers not granted to them in the text. That makes it pretty difficult to argue that it is obvious what the general expectations were. Remember strict scrutiny refers to rights and not to the rest of the document. I think they would be horrified at the idea of multiple levels of scrutiny.

I hope that even if you disagree you see this as less content free.
 
61DD6C99-75C5-4A97-B04F-58688778CCFD.png
 
Mental-illness can manifest from associating with and being surrounded by other mentally-ill people that push a lie until it becomes reality in their sick minds. Everyone wants to be accepted into a group, even if that group is a bunch of evil, pathological lying, mentally-ill socialists, aka Biden supporters.
 
hurr durr stop the steal patriots and commies for the win insert meme.
 
It wasn't meant to have content. It was meant to be appropriately dismissive of a bad analogy. Using the same format, I would suggest this one. I see a major difference between being ass raped nightly for four years, and being inappropriately touched once in a while.

So do I think Republicans are perfect, or even very good, of course not. They aren't. But I don't think that means there is no difference. I think that a four year pause in bad legislation really is worth something, even if it is not as good as repeal. But I am pragmatic in that way.

To your other points, Romneycare in MA is different from Obamacare for two reasons. First, I believe that the proper reading of the Constitution gives states much more leeway than the federal government for various laws and programs, and second I think that in MA it served as a moderate alternative to what the population wanted vs in the US it was not at all what the population wanted and far too radical. In the same vein, take Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. While they vote almost identically, Collins is an outstanding senator and Murkowski is a joke. Why? Because Collins is far better than anybody else we could get from Maine, and Murkowski is far worse than anybody else we could get from Alaska. It is similar to the idea in baseball of wins above replacement value. The MA example vs Obamacare can be seen similarly.

I agree about the Patriot Act. I have written that many times. I was the only Republican I knew who thought it was a bad idea back then, and was generally called a commie for that just as I am in here for some opinions. Plus ca change.

I am not sure strict scrutiny was even a glimmer in the founders eye. I think they believed that these rights were not negotiable, but it is undeniably true that, at least since Marbury v Madison, which included signers on every level of the case, the courts have self arrogated powers not granted to them in the text. That makes it pretty difficult to argue that it is obvious what the general expectations were. Remember strict scrutiny refers to rights and not to the rest of the document. I think they would be horrified at the idea of multiple levels of scrutiny.

I hope that even if you disagree you see this as less content free.
Thank you - that was much better discourse.

I understand your point. And your approach is practical.

The issue I have with that approach is that fundamentally most of the political compromises that occur are one party trading something financially benificial to them and their patrons for everlasting harm toward the citizenry.

And they swap positions every cycle. Those with the mandate take our freedom and those in the back row take our money.

So your practical approach has extended the life of the Republic and that is laudable...but the bill is due now.

I don’t blame any of us, however. If anything the last 100 years of war fighting made this machine that is going to murder our country.
We had to have it so that we wouldn’t have to salute Hitler or Stalin and now it’s time for our trip through the wood chipper.

That and the original Civil War. And direct election of Senators. So many places to go wrong, so much money greasing the bad pathways.
It’s a Shakespearean tragedy, as our founders always knew it would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote
So what is the verdict on the Lindell show?

I liked the heavy coffee mugs.

The Retired Col working on the AZ audit comes off as capable.

Shiva presents himself in MA as more popular than he is. He does get his signs and shit out though. This past election is marred by the specter of the RINO Governor....he has destroyed the state and the R party. Sec State Galvin is a snake. I discount his political career but assume his MIT credentials are legit - tough to fake it at that level.

The most interesting new thing was the presentation of the IP addresses and vote changing....

The show should have been built around that perhaps.

OANN got banned from Twitter for just hosting it......wonder what kind of flak will come Lindells way today.
 
Since the vote is worthless consumerism is the only weapon we have short of armed insurrection. The problem is most folks are not strong enough to deny themselves anything.

Things like turning off the Super Bowl, quitting Facebook or not banking at BoA are just too big a sacrifice. That’s why the left wins. JMHO

Your vote may be worthless but your wallet still has power.
 
Last edited:
hurr durr stop the steal patriots and commies for the win insert meme.
You do realize Time Magazine literally released an article yesterday admitting that the dems and their rich buddies “fortified” the election by breaking election laws and every other mean possible right?

You are the daft one buddy. You’ve repeatedly said there is no evidence of pervasive voter fraud or election manipulation and now they are admitting to it openly!
 
If you guys don’t realize that chode simply gets his rocks off trying to prove he knows big words, i can’t help you. Not a bad guy and not a lib, just a douche. Like this guy:

View attachment 7547896
Many here, me included, sooner or later has made the mistake of wasting time and bandwidth arguing with the troll Chode. Every sight has one. Don't feed the Chode.
 
Many here, me included, sooner or later has made the mistake of wasting time and bandwidth arguing with the troll Chode. Every sight has one. Don't feed the Chode.
I know. I was here for all the election thread. Just had to change my handle as it was a little too close to my name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josh1978
So what is the verdict on the Lindell show?

I liked the heavy coffee mugs.

The Retired Col working on the AZ audit comes off as capable.

Shiva presents himself in MA as more popular than he is. He does get his signs and shit out though. This past election is marred by the specter of the RINO Governor....he has destroyed the state and the R party. Sec State Galvin is a snake. I discount his political career but assume his MIT credentials are legit - tough to fake it at that level.

The most interesting new thing was the presentation of the IP addresses and vote changing....

The show should have been built around that perhaps.

OANN got banned from Twitter for just hosting it......wonder what kind of flak will come Lindells way today.

Lindell will be just fine. As for the show, I think it's possible for those things to have happened, but that wouldn't hold up a court of law. Like everything leaning towards the conservative side, we're all painted with the same brush. I'm sorry, but January 6th hurt us much more than most believe. It will take a lot of work from those R Congress Critters to show the absurdity of the Demwit's manifest destiny theology.
 
You do realize Time Magazine literally released an article yesterday admitting that the dems and their rich buddies “fortified” the election by breaking election laws and every other mean possible right?

You are the daft one buddy. You’ve repeatedly said there is no evidence of pervasive voter fraud or election manipulation and now they are admitting to it openly!

That speaks loudly. Time magazine is not the magazine we grew up reading. It's another arm of the Left. For them to admit to that in print speaks volumes.
 


Well done analysis of the capital shooting. Check out the angle of the handgun during discharge vs the "impact" of the woman's neck.


That is a good video. I'll have to go back and review it again because, even with his breakdown, everything goes by fast.

One thing for certain is that if that woman ever surfaces somewhere else on the globe, there will be some very powerful people that will ensure that she will be dead - permanently.
 
Thank you - that was much better discourse.

I understand your point. And your approach is practical.

The issue I have with that approach is that fundamentally most of the political compromises that occur are one party trading something financially benificial to them and their patrons for everlasting harm toward the citizenry.

And they swap positions every cycle. Those with the mandate take our freedom and those in the back row take our money.

So your practical approach has extended the life of the Republic and that is laudable...but the bill is due now.

I don’t blame any of us, however. If anything the last 100 years of war fighting made this machine that is going to murder our country.
We had to have it so that we wouldn’t have to salute Hitler or Stalin and now it’s time for our trip through the wood chipper.

That and the original Civil War. And direct election of Senators. So many places to go wrong, so much money greasing the bad pathways.
It’s a Shakespearean tragedy, as our founders always knew it would be.
Look, I'd say the same thing to you I said to myself as a Trump skeptical conservative, and the same thing I say to friends who are Libertarians - you need to work for 3 years and 363 days out of four years to put for the best ideas you can and to convince people to make the party and country better, and then for one day every two years you need to nut up and vote for the better of two alternatives, because doing anything else is absolutely self destructive. That is what I did with Trump, and why I have no respect for Never Trumpers who couldn't. It is what I would expect of anybody who gives a shit about the country.

Yeah, yeah, I know, a bunch of people are convinced the election was stolen with no real evidence and by putting forth a lot of complex theories they don't even begin to understand. Hell, the number of people who know the word algorithm has probably quadrupled the last few months. They think their votes don't count when in reality their guy just lost. They still need to get off their asses and vote every two years, because the other options are too terrible.
 
I know. I was here for all the election thread. Just had to change my handle as it was a little too close to my name.
Mine is my name. I have nothing to hide and won’t say anything on here that I wouldn’t say to someone’s face. I try to be respectful although at times my emotions take over. If I am wrong I say I’m wrong and I apologize and go on.
Not saying anything is wrong with a unique handle, I just chose to use my name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote
incompetent or worse than that?


The FBI (not all of them but definitely the brass) have proven to be incompetent by way of malicious partisan fuckery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
Choid has developed this new app that takes regular verbiage, written or spoken word, and turns it into unintelligible psycho babble.
I think psychobabble has to do with psychology. I'm pretty sure I've never commented on psychology.
 
Mine is my name. I have nothing to hide and won’t say anything on here that I wouldn’t say to someone’s face. I try to be respectful although at times my emotions take over. If I am wrong I say I’m wrong and I apologize and go on.
Not saying anything is wrong with a unique handle, I just chose to use my name.

Fair. I try to do the same. And would still buy @Choid a beer because i believe in civil discourse. But, with the political climate and targeting of basically half the country as enemies of the state, figured it was a small change. Not that it would really stop whoever ultimately wanted to figure out who i am.
 
Fair. I try to do the same. And would still buy @Choid a beer because i believe in civil discourse. But, with the political climate and targeting of basically half the country as enemies of the state, figured it was a small change. Not that it would really stop whoever ultimately wanted to figure out who i am.
🍻. Trust me, dude, even though I am not on the side of the majority here about what happened in the election, I doubt you would be able to find a cunt hairs worth of difference between you and me (any of you) on actual policy or beliefs. Especially when it comes to political targeting of speech and thought. There has to be room at least for that or the right becomes so small it is insignificant. I will try to leave my big words at home.
 
One thing for certain is that if that woman ever surfaces somewhere else on the globe,

Possibly yes. But something is off about that character. It wasn't mentioned in the video but go look at her picture in the media vs the person you see on video. That's not the same person, very obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josh1978
🍻. Trust me, dude, even though I am not on the side of the majority here about what happened in the election, I doubt you would be able to find a cunt hairs worth of difference between you and me (any of you) on actual policy or beliefs. Especially when it comes to political targeting of speech and thought. There has to be room at least for that or the right becomes so small it is insignificant. I will try to leave my big words at home.
how do vote counts go down?
if voting is reported in batches as they are tabulated (everyone has seen the edison data feed by now), why do trump vote counts go down?
 
You do realize Time Magazine literally released an article yesterday admitting that the dems and their rich buddies “fortified” the election by breaking election laws and every other mean possible right?

You are the daft one buddy. You’ve repeatedly said there is no evidence of pervasive voter fraud or election manipulation and now they are admitting to it openly!


Seems like they conspired to remove my right to vote and cancel it out....



I wonder how that "Alliance between Labor and Management" is working out now as workers in industries get their pink slips?
 
But, but, but there's no proof of election fraud.......

I guess I'm just a terrorist for believing any of this could happen.
.gov would never lie.
they just lost track of the seth rich laptop and thousands of pages of documents, and they were joking when they responded to foia requests that his name didn't exist anywhere in doj or fbi records.
 
You do realize Time Magazine literally released an article yesterday admitting that the dems and their rich buddies “fortified” the election by breaking election laws and every other mean possible right?

You are the daft one buddy. You’ve repeatedly said there is no evidence of pervasive voter fraud or election manipulation and now they are admitting to it openly!
I read the article. There is a lot of disturbing shit in it, and all of it was known before the elections if you were paying attention. I am, frankly, surprised that they admitted that the BLM protests were just another tool they used toward winning the elections. That said, it is a lot of hardball politics, much of it shady, some of it probably illegal. It was not, however, election fraud. There is a difference.

Do you want me to denounce Democrats as terrible people who won't let anything get in their way of winning? I am happy to. I even posted that people should understand that an advantage that progressives have is that since they believe progress is the only moral goal, they are never encumbered by morality in their actions, because if those actions lead to progress they are by definition moral, while conservatives struggle with the problem of morals getting in the way of tactics. I think I was called a commie for that. I think they are awful. In fact, if they could conspire to steal an election, I think they just might, but I don't think that is what happened here.
 
When it’s so obvious to everyone who thinks that the amer can guber mint is out to destroy, kill, steal, and steal from.... a mere I cans...
 
this guy has a point, but i don't think anyone is going to do anything.

 
Off topic....just an example of where our Governments are in regards to their thinking of what we are to them.

Their feeling is their job is to "Break our will".

What we disagree allowing government to do they feel their job is to wear us down and force the govt will upon us.

Its kind of a long recording from the Howie Carr radio show. The point is within the first 6 minutes. Get to about the 4:00 minute mark to hear the official stating he has to "Break our will"


They are going to raise our gas tax to $5 or so a gallon and thats in addition to the fucking Biden will give us.
 
Off topic....just an example of where our Governments are in regards to their thinking of what we are to them.

Their feeling is their job is to "Break our will".

What we disagree allowing government to do they feel their job is to wear us down and force the govt will upon us.

Its kind of a long recording from the Howie Carr radio show. The point is within the first 6 minutes. Get to about the 4:00 minute mark to hear the official stating he has to "Break our will"


They are going to raise our gas tax to $5 or so a gallon and thats in addition to the fucking Biden will give us.
yeah, it sucks that i have to use 3/4 tank to drive to the range and back.
it is really the only driving i have to do regularly since i work remotely 99% of the time.
 
yeah, it sucks that i have to use 3/4 tank to drive to the range and back.
it is really the only driving i have to do regularly since i work remotely 99% of the time.


Im more pissed about the mindset "We need to break your will" from a punk bureaucrat.

Where in the Constitution is it the mandate of Govt to "break the will" of the People?