• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

223 vs 22-250

Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Judd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am going to put together a prairie dog rig. I had my mind made up on a 22-250 and a buddy told me to go with the 223 because the recoil isn't as much and you get to see more of your kills. He says that is the most fun part of dog hunting.

I plan on reloading because I have bought all the reloading so cost of the rounds doesn't really play a factor in it.

Truth be told I almost had decided to go with the 220 swift even but decided 22-250 would be a little better.

What is y'alls thoughts? </div></div>

If your going to build a 22cal go with a 22-250AI or a 220AI, no question about it at all and we have reamers for both. Shooting PDogs is all about AIR time, it make me laugh every time someone recommend a fast twist barrel and heavy bullets to shoot PDogs,,,WTF

Post pics of your build when finished
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

I've shot thousands of PDs, if the shooting is hot and heavy, 223 or better yet 223AI then you can shoot both. The TAC 20 is also great. Easier on barrels easier on the wallet. On a good day I've shot 600+ rounds. If the shooting is not one dog after the other and your shots are longer in windy conditions build yourself a 6-250, 22-250 necked up to 6mm. If it could only be one 223 would be it.

Jeff
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Agree with 22-250! My 22-250 700 vs sf shot easy under 1/2" right out of the box. Rolled some loads and put it in a Mcmillan A5 and its 1/4" gun now. Love it!! I have taken many white tail deer with it also, even though some say it's too small of a round. I strongly disagree after personally seeing numerous deer drop in their tracks with mine.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

I would go 22-250 in a bolt gun. If you want .223 go with an AR type build. The 22-250 has more visual effect on targets and files flatter.

That being said I only shoot the 22-250 when hunting p-dogs. My AR gets much more use and still gets a few p-dogs when I go hunting.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shoot4fun</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> There is not enough recoil to take the fun out of watching them fly.
I guess that means I would vote for 22-250.
</div></div>
same here, i run a couple of each 223 and 22-250's, the 250 dont recoil enough to miss the explosion @ the other end, unless your zoomed into 20X... think about runnin a can on ur new rifle makes shootin alot more fun!!!
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

I just got a Remmy 700VSS in .22-250. I put a Vortex Viper 6.5-20x50. I will eventually reload but for now its gonna be factory feed. I could not find a twist rate on the barrel. Anyone know what it might be. I wanna shoot the Hornady Superformance 50 V-max.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

My friend has a .22-250 and man that thing is a lot of fun! If you like red mist and sending them 'lil fellers 15' feet in the air then the .22-250 is the one you are looking for.

I have always been infatuated with the .220 swift though, the velocities on that thing are impressive. I can only Imagine what a 30gr varmint grenade doing 4000+ fps would do to a gopher...
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: StealthMode223</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I just got a Remmy 700VSS in .22-250. I put a Vortex Viper 6.5-20x50. I will eventually reload but for now its gonna be factory feed. I could not find a twist rate on the barrel. Anyone know what it might be. I wanna shoot the Hornady Superformance 50 V-max. </div></div>
i believe most of the Rem 700 250s are a 1-14.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Truth, you both for any trip, since you don't have big towns nearby.

After you heat up the barrel, you some thing to shoot while the .22/250 cools off.

In any busy action, and use your .22s and .17s while your all the centerfires to cool off.

My friend's last trip he had to sell an XD to his father (a dealer, mind) to pay for ammo (.204, .223,.243, a couple of rimfires).

Your .22/.250, you're get 500-600 more fps for longer range.
A varmint rifle isn't much a big deal for recoil.
Plugs AND muffs.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Nothing wrong with adding a brake to a 22-250 to almost completely eliminate any recoil. I know it isn't necessary, but doesn't hurt anything. You'd already be wearing hearing protection anyway.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

For you Remington 700 22-250 shooters. Whats the heaviest bullet your 1/14 twist barrel can handle? I'm thinking the heavier higher BC bullets (60gn) will buck wind better at long range
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Smokin99,
No, I wasn't joking and obviously you have never owned nor have any experience with the 223 wssm round. You're probably repeating gossip and I thought only women did that.
I have 1300 rounds down my 27" Kreiger barrel shooting 55 V-Max's at 3935 fps. Factory barrels are chrome lined to aid in barrel life.
For prairie dogs, I alternate between my 223 wssm and my Savage 12BVSS in 22-250. Great aerial displays with either gun.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Judd</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am going to put together a prairie dog rig. I had my mind made up on a 22-250 and a buddy told me to go with the 223 because the recoil isn't as much and you get to see more of your kills. He says that is the most fun part of dog hunting.

I plan on reloading because I have bought all the reloading so cost of the rounds doesn't really play a factor in it.

Truth be told I almost had decided to go with the 220 swift even but decided 22-250 would be a little better.

What is y'alls thoughts? </div></div>


Either caliber will technically be just fine, but what is the FUN in just fine?? There are so many factors that you could bounce around to try to justify this caliber or that caliber but in all honesty you should do what makes the most sense for you & makes you the happiest.

I go on 2 big prairie dog shoots each summer to help with the winter coyote hunting withdrawls that I suffer from & I bring twin 22-250's with me that are physically identical down to the finest detail less the color of the HS Stock on each. They were both built at the same time on the same equipment & wear the same barrel/stock/action/scope/etc, etc, etc. I even shoot the same loads in each so both pipes wear evenly. I rotate between rifles to keep the barrels as cool as possible & not having to stop to let the barrel cool over & over is that many more rounds I send down range over the weekend.. I also have a good cleaning regimen out in the field. I always have 2 barrels on order so that after the prairie dog summer I am ready for coyotes come winter time.

Over the course of say 2,000 rounds each the .223 will use less powder, less brass life, less barrel life, less fun as it pertains to the red mist factor! As far as the recoil vs. spotting kills concern... I feel it doesn't really exist between the 2 considering the rifles are close to the same weight & the same optics.

If you truely dont care about the cost difference between these 2 calibers & barrel life & love to see prairie dogs turn into red organic mist then I say go 22-250 hands down. I use a 14 twist with 50-55gr Berger Varmint/Nosler Ballistic Tip or Hornady VMax's @ 3800+ FPS & they destroy very well.

The 220 Swift with good explosive pills pushing insane velocities well past 4,100 FPS is hilarious to see!!!
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rich56</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For you Remington 700 22-250 shooters. Whats the heaviest bullet your 1/14 twist barrel can handle? I'm thinking the heavier higher BC bullets (60gn) will buck wind better at long range </div></div>

I'm shooting Sierra 63 grain SMP thorugh a SPS Varmint.
They shoot great where 40, 50, and 55 grainers just shot okay.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

I've varminted with both many times and although I love the 22-250, if you had to choose one I probably would lean twards the .223. It is plenty accurate and way less expensive to take and run a lot of ammo through and with the right twist with heavy bullets it will reach out there too.

Good Luck,

JamieD

______________________________
Jamie Dodson
814-262-7994
Wolf Precision
AI Stocks and Accessories

 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

I used a 223 like everyone said no vaper trail. Then I went to 22-250 no looking back. 22-250 got it in a rifle and pistol liked it so much. Now i got 6x284 really blows them up.
mail.jpg
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Lots of hunting experience with a 22-250... fantastic round, great killing power.... It's right in the middle between a 223 and a 220 swift.
You have more umph than a 223 and a much longer barrel life than a Swift....Kinda the best combination without really any drawbacks IMHO.
Coyotes don't like this round. I've asked them what they thought of it but they just remained silent and had a hollow dead stare.
....SmokeRolls
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 338AX</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I used a 223 like everyone said no vaper trail. Then I went to 22-250 no looking back. Now I got a new 6x284 barrel life stinks but dogs blow up. 22-250 got it in a rifle and pistol liked it so much.
mail.jpg
</div></div>

WHAT??
I CAN"T HEAR YOU!!
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

Just to update...I broke down and bought a 22-250 from a guy here on the Hide. I look forward to getting it and shooting some dogs this summer.

Thanks for y'alls information...you got me back where I was before my buddy started talking trash
smile.gif
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tucsondave</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JCH</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Night poacher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">223 = Ford Focus

22-250 = ZR1 Corvette</div></div>

True but think about it this way

223...barrel life of over 5k and uses 24ish grains of powder

22-250...barrel life less than 2k uses 38-42 grains of powder </div></div>


Ackley Improve that 22-250 </div></div>

That's like sending your vette to Lingenfelter. Another .22-250 vote(especially an AI). I've got 2 .22-250s and when my first one needs a re-barrel it's going to be an 8 twist AI with a TBAC .223P can.
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

not what was asked but since i can walk out my back yard and start shooting pdogs i thought i'd put my 2 cents in. 204. Thats the way to go with a pdog gun. and Dont feel worried about yotes with it either it will put them down at any range u need to be shooting at them. I have a rem 204, 223, couple of ar's, rem 22-250 and so on. One thing i like about the 204 is being able to watch your hits and that thing is fast, u can actually tell the diffrence between it and the 223 in the field. Anyway it shoots flat and is easy on everything. Loading for the guns is where u can see the diffrence. The 22-250 uses so much more powder than everything else, i about just shoot the 243 instead because u use bout the same powder and have a wider choices of bullets which will alow you to reach out there for them longer shots. 204 is flatter and faster than the 223 but uses less powder, less recoil,less report, and less barrel ware then the 22-250. Fast and flat......
 
Re: 223 vs 22-250

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Skg_Mre_Lght</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Personally, I am a .220 Swift kind of guy. More than the .22-250, Lots more than the .223, and I don't have a problem knowing which brass is mine at the range, or dog town. </div></div>

+ 1 on the 220 Swift