Yes, quite a bit.
To start, the ARMS #22 rings are a less than optimum but still pretty conventional design, with the upper half and lower half being mirror images of the other, each addressing 180 degrees of the scope's circumference. The better way is like Badger, KAC, and Nightforce build their rings, with the bottom portion contacting 180 degrees followed by a relief cut at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, and the top 160 degrees. Less ring marks this way, plus less tendency for the scope to rotate when you tighten a screw on one side or the other.
The biggest problem with the ARMS rings are the inevitable slippage that will occur due to their throw lever design.