-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Expander Mandrels- Mandrel Materials Importance?
- Thread starter spife7980
- Start date
Try Hexagonal Boron Nitride (hBN) powder. Put a little on a q tip and swipe the inside of the neck with it, I use it all the time when sizing my 50 BMG cases. Reduces the expander ball friction by at least 60% in my estimation.
A sinclair expander has the same dimensions as a 21st century as far as fitting in the top goes. The Sinclair is a bit longer in overall length
Have you used it in the Sinclair Expander mandrel? I want to buy one for mine if it does.
I have used the sinclair mandrel in the 21st century body and it works fine and the dimensions of the mandrels are the same so you could do the inverse as well.
Got mine. They mic .307+ and .223+ not like they told me over the phone
And that’s the turning? Or the expanding? Those sounds like the claimed expanding dimensions
Expanding.
The man said .306” and .222” for the expanding. Maybe he meant those were the plain stainless mandrels. The TiN coating must add .001” or so.
The man said .306” and .222” for the expanding. Maybe he meant those were the plain stainless mandrels. The TiN coating must add .001” or so.
Would this even matter if you use a bushing die? I should state that I only use the expander mandrel to uniform bent case mouths. I don’t turn the necks.
Last edited:
I think so, but that might be my own reloading OCD kicking in. Bushing sizes the neck down to X and leaves the outside of the neck round, so any slight imperfections are pushed to the inside. Running the mandrel through the mouth ensures the inside of the neck, which is gripping the bullet, is perfectly round.
Finally got around to remembering to do this, taken with a Mitutoyo caliper (.0005 accuracy ) and rcbs micrometer (.0001 accuracy). (Though my mic touch is admittedly poor)
21st century TiN
22 cal turning mandrel
.2220 on the cal, .2222 on the mic
21st century TiN
24 cal turning mandrel
.2405 on the cal, .2409 on the mic
Sinclair stainless
27 cal turning mandrel
.2745 on the cal, .2748 on the mic
21st century TiN
30 cal turning mandrel
.3055 on the cal, .3057 on the mic
21st century TiN
22 cal turning mandrel
.2220 on the cal, .2222 on the mic
21st century TiN
24 cal turning mandrel
.2405 on the cal, .2409 on the mic
Sinclair stainless
27 cal turning mandrel
.2745 on the cal, .2748 on the mic
21st century TiN
30 cal turning mandrel
.3055 on the cal, .3057 on the mic
Last edited:
The short of it is that, if the material under the PVD process is polished well enough (prior to deposition), it can be much better than carbide (either carbide containing steel or CoCr-C HVOF). Amongst the PVD coatings, DLC (a diamond-graphite 'mixture) will be the best; followed by TiN, TiCN, and then the complex ones like AlCrTiCN, but it really depends on what settings are used in the HPPMS system. Dry lubes like Mo2S will significantly help as well. Careful on the PVD processes though; it can possibly change the dimensions of the substrate material from the high temperature exposure.
I have the 21st century TiN turning mandrels for 223, 6mm, 6.5, and 308. Just started using them this month to get uniform neck tension. I am using a Redding bushing sizing die first without the expander ball. I set neck tension .002” less then the outer neck diameter of a loaded cartridge. These are the instructions from Redding. The problem I am running into (sometimes) is that I am getting distinct belling at the top of the case mouth after I use the mandrel. This happens about 10% of the time. Any clue as to why this is happening ? I am thinking the inner neck diameter may by too tight for the turning mandrel and I get deformed belled brass as a result.
Any suggestions ?
Any suggestions ?
Maybe the mandrel is hitting some of the case necks off center due to misalignment between the case, she’ll holder, die, etc. Sometimes a case has a defect in the rim that prevents it from centering itself in the shell holder.
Similar threads
