Re: lapua brass prep??
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nicholst55</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Frogman77</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I took one case today and found that there was very little if any burr in the flash hole, and the primer pocket uniformer did remover some brass but it was also very little....
my neck thickness variance was from .014 to .0155. NOt sure if that's enough difference to matter, I might turn down to .0145.
I don't mind brass prep, but really I dont' want to do any harm to the brass if it was already made "perfect". </div></div>
Do you have a tight-neck chamber? If not, you won't gain much, if anything, from turning the necks.</div></div>
A lot of long range shooters turn necks in order to a) improve concentricity and b) maintain consistent neck tension.
Concentricity is improved by having the same neck thickness throughout the neck wall.
Consistent neck tension is maintained by having the same neck wall thickness for every case... for people who are using neck bushings (hence OD) to control neck tension, this is important. For people using expander balls, this is probably less important as the expander ball should create consistent ID.
FWIW, you can cull out Lapua cases to get less than .001" variance within the neck, and less than .001" average thickness from case to case (typically about .015"), and end up keeping 60%-70% of Lapua cases while getting 80% of the benefit of neck turning. Of course, neck turning will get you .00015" variance from case to case and even less within a case. That is probably overboard, but it only needs to be done once during the life of the case.
On flash hole uniforming... I was considering doing that, but I read an article by German Salazar writing that because Lapua flash holes are so good, putting the chamfer on them actually caused his SD's to increase. Makes sense... taking something that has a good finish and then hitting it with a hand tool might yield you worse results than when you started. Still, it certainly makes sense to do a visual inspection of each case.