Leica PRS 5-30×56 with PRB Reticle

amerimono

Private
Minuteman
Sep 16, 2018
24
6
6
I got a few on hand currently and will be messing with them extensively throughout the day. Feel free to give me call or shoot message if ya'll have any questions. And yes, they list at $2,699 but as I always, if you want to talk real pricing just give me a call.
Can you pm me a price for the PRS with the ballistic reticle?
 

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
You even let it sit next to the TT!
It is a very nice scope, but it is no Tangent Theta, nor should it be at $2k less. I am trying to bracket it with scopes that are a little more expensive and a little less, but honestly, it kinda depends on what I have on hand. The most direct competitor price-wise is Leupold Mark 5, which I happen to have here and like a lot.

http://instagr.am/p/B9g5varHsLA/
ILya
 

mrtoyz

Armchair Commando
Belligerents
Jul 11, 2009
705
199
49
Western WA
Good stuff, thank you for doing this. Gotta day I’m a little let down if the Leupy is it’s closest competition...
 

samb300

Anarchy Outdoors, Accuracy Obsession
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2013
1,405
2,148
219
Milwaukee, WI
It is a very nice scope, but it is no Tangent Theta, nor should it be at $2k less. I am trying to bracket it with scopes that are a little more expensive and a little less, but honestly, it kinda depends on what I have on hand. The most direct competitor price-wise is Leupold Mark 5, which I happen to have here and like a lot.

http://instagr.am/p/B9g5varHsLA/
ILya
I think it's interesting that in the original presser and media photos, Austin Orgain is quoted and appears to have played some role in the design/development/testing. Yet the photos from his win at this weekends CCC PRS match, he's still shooting a Tangent Theta...
 

amerimono

Private
Minuteman
Sep 16, 2018
24
6
6
It is a very nice scope, but it is no Tangent Theta, nor should it be at $2k less. I am trying to bracket it with scopes that are a little more expensive and a little less, but honestly, it kinda depends on what I have on hand. The most direct competitor price-wise is Leupold Mark 5, which I happen to have here and like a lot.

http://instagr.am/p/B9g5varHsLA/
ILya
So is it most comparable to the Mark 5 as far as the scope is concerned or just as far as price? I didn't understand what you meant by that.
 

lte82

Shooter
Belligerents
Mar 12, 2013
1,766
901
219
I think it's interesting that in the original presser and media photos, Austin Orgain is quoted and appears to have played some role in the design/development/testing. Yet the photos from his win at this weekends CCC PRS match, he's still shooting a Tangent Theta...
If you could afford to buy Tangents would you use a free Bushnell just because it was free? Some things are worth paying for...
 

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
I think it's interesting that in the original presser and media photos, Austin Orgain is quoted and appears to have played some role in the design/development/testing. Yet the photos from his win at this weekends CCC PRS match, he's still shooting a Tangent Theta...
I was under an impression that Austin was sponsored by Leica. I do not know what the terms of the agreement are, but I know a few sponsored people who will shoot with Tangents when they think noone is looking. I have a TT 5-25x56 with Gen 3 XR, so I understand why.

ILya
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
So is it most comparable to the Mark 5 as far as the scope is concerned or just as far as price? I didn't understand what you meant by that.
I am only talking about price for now. It is too early to have anything definite in terms of where the Leica PRS fits quality-wise.

It is exactly the same size as Delta Stryker 4.5-30x56 and elevation turret design is very similar to the locking turret on the latest Stryker and EOTech 5-25x50. Someone commented on that on one of my Instagram posts, so I went and looked.

I have no idea what to make out of that, to be honest. The optics look a little different from the Stryker I have and Leica has more FOV, so it is definitely not the same scope like I have seen insinuated. Maybe there is some shared mechanical DNA? I do not know. I asked.

So far, I like the scope and dislike the reticle. It is a tree reticle that makes me want to dial exclusively. It does have good turrets and they seem to track well, so that's not a bad thing per se.

ILya
 

lte82

Shooter
Belligerents
Mar 12, 2013
1,766
901
219
I am only talking about price for now. It is too early to have anything definite in terms of where the Leica PRS fits quality-wise.

It is exactly the same size as Delta Stryker 4.5-30x56 and elevation turret design is very similar to the locking turret on the latest Stryker and EOTech 5-25x50. Someone commented on that on one of my Instagram posts, so I went and looked.

I have no idea what to make out of that, to be honest. The optics look a little different from the Stryker I have and Leica has more FOV, so it is definitely not the same scope like I have seen insinuated. Maybe there is some shared mechanical DNA? I do not know. I asked.

So far, I like the scope and dislike the reticle. It is a tree reticle that makes me want to dial exclusively. It does have good turrets and they seem to track well, so that's not a bad thing per se.

ILya
Is there noticeable CA?
 

B-P-UU

Full Member
Belligerents
Feb 13, 2017
881
457
69
I think it's interesting that in the original presser and media photos, Austin Orgain is quoted and appears to have played some role in the design/development/testing. Yet the photos from his win at this weekends CCC PRS match, he's still shooting a Tangent Theta...
You are correct, he was in fact running a TT this weekend.
 

steelheadr99

Private
Hessian
Belligerents
Apr 13, 2017
35
7
12
Oregon
So far, I like the scope and dislike the reticle. It is a tree reticle that makes me want to dial exclusively. It does have good turrets and they seem to track well, so that's not a bad thing per se.

ILya
The reticle is my problem with the scope, Otherwise it looks very interesting!
 

StrayDog

At large
Belligerents
Nov 25, 2010
362
133
49
ME
Anybody! I've seen them sell out on EO, and figured someone here is playing with one...
Looking very much forward to your review Ilya, I know it takes time.
Meanwhile, hoping for teasers from the membership during this lull.
I really think this could be my next rimfire match scope, but will probably have to see the reticle in person first.
 

Moose

Sergeant
Belligerents
Jul 3, 2005
1,598
508
219
NJ
New Jersey just closed all the rifle ranges and it sucks.I hope this is all behind us soon.
 

StrayDog

At large
Belligerents
Nov 25, 2010
362
133
49
ME
Is the PRB center circle growing on you at all Ilya, or not so much?

I first got into LR rifle stuff when I lived in NM, a great place to escape into BLM land...

Glad to hear tracking is on, how's the tooless turret mechanism working--feel solid or weak? All metal?

Thanks for the lock-down update!
 

357Max

Sergeant of the Hide
Hessian
Belligerents
Minuteman
Sep 11, 2019
294
294
69
Marylandistan
Bump for this thread.
Someone anyone care to way in on glass?
Short version..........come on throw us a carrot!
Better then Vortex razor G2, Leupold Mark 5, Kahles K525i?
 

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
Is the PRB center circle growing on you at all Ilya, or not so much?

I first got into LR rifle stuff when I lived in NM, a great place to escape into BLM land...

Glad to hear tracking is on, how's the tooless turret mechanism working--feel solid or weak? All metal?

Thanks for the lock-down update!
The center circle is not my favourtite feature, but I can live with it.

The tree itself give me problems. The reticle is kinda weird in that there is a ton of different aming points and that is sorta nonintutive to me. I have been staring at it for over a month now and it is not growing on me one bit.

Primary aiming point is a circle, so you are aiming with an open spot. Not great for shooting gorups, but works fine on plates.
Wind holds if you dial elevation are various 0.2 mrad hashmarks on the primary stadia and we are all reasonably used to that.
Once you get below the primary, weird things start happening.
Odd mrad wind holds are a regular small crosshair or a dot depending on where your holdover is.
Even mrad wind holds are a small x or a dot depending on where your holdover is.
Half-mrad wind holds are a small floating vertical hashmark.
Some full mrad holds are small numbers, which is useful , but that ends up being one more aiming point.

When all is said and done you have six or seven different aiming points and if I need to hold between them I have to figure out where the middle is. I am always 0.1 to 0.2 mrad off with this reticle somehow.

Then there is a the lower portion of the tree that gets thicker once you are below 10 mrad of hold and has those weird striations going all the way out to the edges of the FOV every 10 mrad.

Aside from the fact that I do not understand why most of that tree below 10 mrad is there at all, making it thicker is simply counterproductive. I dial down when I do not have a particularly steady shooting position, so I really want the primary aiming point to stand out. Because the bottom portion of the tree is thicker and has those wings, it is quite distracting.

It is as if the reticle was designed by a committee in order to be different for the sake of being different.

I am sure some people will like it. Reticle are personal, but if I were buying one, I'd go with their Ballistic reticle

ILya
 

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
As I work on a proper review, here are some comments on the optics and mechanics.

The mechanical design is clearly related to the LOW made scopes like the 4.5-30x56 Delta Stryker and my best guess is that LOW makes a good number of mechanical parts for Leica.

I pressed Leica folks quite a bit on this to get the full story and they are saying that optical design is theirs, assembly is done by them in Germany and a good number of mechanics are sourced from Japan. That correlates to what I see, so I am inclined to believe that they simply took existing and proven to be reliable chassis from LOW, re-designed the optics and tweaked the turrets and some other mechanics. That is a pretty good way to get Leica optics to the market with a somewhat reasonable price tag.

Optical design clearly looks different with better FOV, depth of field and contrast than the native LOW design. I have a Delta Stryker 4.5-30x56 here that I like a lot, but side-by-side Leica is better optically. They eyepiece is definitely substantially different and I think it goes well beyond that.

Optomechanically, I like the scope quite a bit, so I will probably end up adding it to my list of recommendation when equipped with the Ballistic reticle. PRB reticle is not my thing as I described above.

ILya
 

357Max

Sergeant of the Hide
Hessian
Belligerents
Minuteman
Sep 11, 2019
294
294
69
Marylandistan
Thanks Ilya for the insight on optical quality.

I've been looking to pick up another scope (PRS capable) that would deliver a little better optical quality then a Razor G2.
This looks like it may fit the bill well.
I'll take another look at the ballistic reticle before making a decision.
I don't have any real experience behind tree type reticle's so the PRB has some appeal to me at least from a simplicity stand point.
 

tuscan

Private
Belligerents
Mar 10, 2017
7
1
6
As I work on a proper review, here are some comments on the optics and mechanics.

The mechanical design is clearly related to the LOW made scopes like the 4.5-30x56 Delta Stryker and my best guess is that LOW makes a good number of mechanical parts for Leica.

I pressed Leica folks quite a bit on this to get the full story and they are saying that optical design is theirs, assembly is done by them in Germany and a good number of mechanics are sourced from Japan. That correlates to what I see, so I am inclined to believe that they simply took existing and proven to be reliable chassis from LOW, re-designed the optics and tweaked the turrets and some other mechanics. That is a pretty good way to get Leica optics to the market with a somewhat reasonable price tag.

Optical design clearly looks different with better FOV, depth of field and contrast than the native LOW design. I have a Delta Stryker 4.5-30x56 here that I like a lot, but side-by-side Leica is better optically. They eyepiece is definitely substantially different and I think it goes well beyond that.

Optomechanically, I like the scope quite a bit, so I will probably end up adding it to my list of recommendation when equipped with the Ballistic reticle. PRB reticle is not my thing as I described above.

ILya
Do you believe the optical quality is on par with Minox ZP5?
 

koshkin

Dark Lord Of Optics
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2006
3,352
4,110
219
New Mexico
www.opticsthoughts.com
Do you believe the optical quality is on par with Minox ZP5?
Hard to say. Tangent is better than the Leica PRS, Kahles K525i is worse. I think optically it is in the same general ballpark as ATACR and Mark 5 although with a somewhat unique character.

It is very competitive in the under $3k market and more compact than most other options. I do not have Minox on hand to compare it with, but if I were to make a guess, I'd say ZP5 is a touch better in terms of optics.

ILya
 

tuscan

Private
Belligerents
Mar 10, 2017
7
1
6
Hard to say. Tangent is better than the Leica PRS, Kahles K525i is worse. I think optically it is in the same general ballpark as ATACR and Mark 5 although with a somewhat unique character.

It is very competitive in the under $3k market and more compact than most other options. I do not have Minox on hand to compare it with, but if I were to make a guess, I'd say ZP5 is a touch better in terms of optics.

ILya
thank you
 

Tono

And...
Belligerents
Mar 19, 2017
495
547
99
Texas
Hard to say. Tangent is better than the Leica PRS, Kahles K525i is worse. I think optically it is in the same general ballpark as ATACR and Mark 5 although with a somewhat unique character.

It is very competitive in the under $3k market and more compact than most other options. I do not have Minox on hand to compare it with, but if I were to make a guess, I'd say ZP5 is a touch better in terms of optics.

ILya
Thanks the info... Eagerly awaiting the full review.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maysys

Tono

And...
Belligerents
Mar 19, 2017
495
547
99
Texas
I've not posted anything on this scope since I'm not as knowledgeable or experienced as most others on the Hide. I was hoping that ILya would have his review posted by now. But since there are a few members asking questions, I decided to put my foot in it... I've had the scope for just over 1 week.

I have the Leica PRS 5-30x56i with the Ballistic Reticle. Purchased the scope from @gr8fuldoug at Camera Land NY. Great to work with, free shipping and no sales tax for Texas... Bought the Spuhr mount from @Mile High Shooting, also very helpful, great to work with and free shipping. They checked to make sure that there were no known issues when using the Spuhr 4602 and the Leica PRS prior to taking the order.

The scope is mounted on a LMT MWS AR, 24" barrel, 6.5 Creedmoor, Spuhr 6 Mil mount. It's not the PRB reticle that most are interested in.

Leica PRS Ballistic reticle.
Screen Shot 2020-05-01 at 12.02.51 AM.png

If you have questions that are not addressed below, please let me know.

I'm no expert and have only used this scope and a Steiner T5Xi 5-25 SCR. So I don't have a lot to compare it to. The Steiner with the SCR reticle is very similar to the Ballistic reticle on the Leica.

One of the things I noticed was the width of the subtensions on center cross hair of the Leica is 0.04 Mils. Whereas the subtensions on center cross hair of the Steiner is 0.03 Mils. I prefer the thinner subtensions on the Steiner. It's not much thiner but can be noticed at maximum magnification.

Although subjective and with little to compare it to, the clarity of the glass on the Leica is very good. Colors are realistic and image is bright. I did not notice any CA. I've only been on the range in the midday sun, few clouds. The clarity and CA on the Leica PRS is better than that on my Steiner T5Xi.

We really need to hear what ILya has to say about this...

The turrets are solid and the detents are crisp/tactile, no mush or play. The magnification adjustment is smooth with good tension. Same goes for the parallax and illumination rings. All markings are clear and legible.

Setting zero on the elevation turret is toolless and easy. Simply flip up what Leica calls the locking toggle, turn counter clockwise to unscrew and pull out the locking toggle from the turret. The elevation turret can then be pulled off. Reposition the elevation turret, to 0, and press down to engage the turret. Then replace the locking toggle and turn clockwise to tighten. The zero on the windage turret is set using the same method.

Below is an image of the locking toggles flipped up.
1588308736011.jpeg

Elevation locking toggle removed.
1588308776087.jpeg

Elevation turret removed.
1588308791690.jpeg

Setting the zero stop is very easy and quick but does require the use of the supplied allen wrench. You can see the zero stop in the image above. It's on the upper brass piece.

Below is an image of from the Leica manual on setting the zero stop.
Screen Shot 2020-04-30 at 11.54.22 PM.png


The allen wrench is hidden under the windage locking toggle. Below is an image of the windage turret with the locking toggle removed to expose the allen wrench.
1588308900845.jpeg


Below are 2 pictures of the elevation locking toggle, removed.
1588308919200.jpeg

1588308930742.jpeg


Parallax was easy to set. The parallax ring only has numbers at 20 yards and 100, marks of varying width and length at other locations on the ring. When zeroing the scope at 100, the parallax ring matched up well. Adjusting the parallax at distances between 200 - 700 yards was not difficult.
1588308947431.jpeg

Illumination is good, but only just barely noticeable in bright midday Texas sun. The illumination ring can be turned fully in either direction, no stops, but detents for each on/off setting. There is an off setting between each of the brightness settings.

The diopter was very quick and easy to set. My eyes are old and I need reading glasses, so I had to dial a little positive on the diopter. The diopter does not have a locking ring.
1588308964641.jpeg


The Leica PRS 5-30x56i has a total of 32 Mils of elevation. After zeroing the scope for my rifle, LMT MWS 24" barrel 6.5 Creedmoor, with a 6 Mil Spuhr mount, I had 19.5 Mils of elevation to work with.

The elevation rotation indicator is an interesting design. As you rotate the elevation knob, the rotation indicator moves up and down, revealing the number of rotations. Below are 3 images.

Rotation indicator at zero elevation, for my rifle. Note that it is not flush with the top of the turret and the number 1 is exposed. This is due to the zero for my rifle being 12.5 Mils above the lowest possible elevation setting.
1588309098094.jpeg


Rotation indicator at beginning of the 2nd rotation, 10 Mils of elevation.
1588309119165.jpeg


Rotation indicator at 19.5 Mils of elevation. Maximum elevation for my rifle.
1588309135155.jpeg


Here's some technical data from Leica. It also come with lens caps, not listed below...

Battery is a Lithium 2032 coin cell.

Screen Shot 2020-04-30 at 10.42.03 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-04-30 at 10.42.27 PM.png


I've been at the range 2 different times with this scope. Once to zero the scope at 100 yards and shoot at 200 yards. Another time to shoot from 200 - 700 yards.

I have not performed a tall target test/tracking test.

The scope was very easy to bore site at 25 yards and zero at 100 yards. The corrections that I needed to make were measured with the reticle and the amount of correction dialed on the turrets matched.

Here's one of the pictures I took while zeroing the rifle at 100 yards. Ammo used was Hornady American Gunner 140gr BTHP. LMT MWS 24" barrel, 6.5 Creedmoor, 6 Mil Spuhr mount.
1588309201809.jpeg


At 200 yards, I dialed the amount of elevation indicated in the Hornady 4DOF ballistic app and made first round impact on a 3" steel target. I switched to a 2" steel target with frist round impact and then to a 1" steel target, all at 200 yards. I was able to hit the 1" target 1/2 of the time. I lost my 2" steel target after the rubber conveyer strap that it was hanging from broke.

When shooting from 200 - 700 yards, 8 MOA targets at 100 yard intervals, I was able make 1st round impacts on the targets when dialing the elevation indicated in the 4DOF app. Return to zero worked correctly. I did not have to dial any windage since the wind was at 12:00. That said, 8 MOA targets are pretty big...

I hope that this answer some of the questions that members may have about the Leica PRS 5-30x56i Ballistic Reticle.
 
Last edited:

Budrichard

Private
Minuteman
Feb 16, 2019
28
14
6
Thanks for the review, just ordered from doug but with the simple L-4A reticle.
Mile High is getting my AI AX 6mm Creedmoor ready to ship and I will have him throw in a Spuhr mount.
Doug has given me good price on S&B when he was a Dealer and Leica M-E rangefinder last year.
Wish he was a March Dealer.
-Richard
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8fuldoug

gr8fuldoug

Supporting Vendor
Commercial Supporter
Belligerents
Jan 24, 2006
4,523
1,810
219
56
Old Bethpage NY
www.cameralandny.com
As soon as March has solid infrastructure in the USA so we can handle any issues that may arise in a quick efficient manner we will solidify our agreement with March and will be a stocking dealer
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash

wjm308

Send it!
Belligerents
Nov 30, 2012
4,002
2,887
219
Black Forest, CO
I've not posted anything on this scope since I'm not as knowledgeable or experienced as most others on the Hide. I was hoping that ILya would have his review posted by now. But since there are a few members asking questions, I decided to put my foot in it... I've had the scope for just over 1 week.

I have the Leica PRS 5-30x56i with the Ballistic Reticle. Purchased the scope from @gr8fuldoug at Camera Land NY. Great to work with, free shipping and no sales tax for Texas... Bought the Spuhr mount from @Mile High Shooting, also very helpful, great to work with and free shipping. They checked to make sure that there were no know issues when using the Spuhr 4602 and the Leica PRS prior to taking the order.

The scope is mounted on a LMT MWS AR, 24" barrel, 6.5 Creedmoor, Spuhr 6 Mil mount. It's not the PRB reticle that most are interested in.

Leica PRS Ballistic reticle.
View attachment 7313851

If you have questions that are not addressed below, please let me know.

I'm no expert and have only used this scope and a Steiner T5Xi 5-25 SCR. So I don't have a lot to compare it to. The Steiner with the SCR reticle is very similar to the Ballistic reticle on the Leica.

One of the things I noticed was the width of the subtensions on center cross hair of the Leica is 0.04 Mils. Whereas the subtensions on center cross hair of the Steiner is 0.03 Mils. I prefer the thinner subtensions on the Steiner. It's not much thiner but can be noticed at maximum magnification.

Although subjective and with little to compare it to, the clarity of the glass on the Leica is very good. Colors are realistic and image is bright. I did not notice any CA. I've only been on the range in the midday sun, few clouds. The clarity and CA on the Leica PRS is better than that on my Steiner T5Xi.

We really need to hear what ILya has to say about this...

The turrets are solid and the detents are crisp/tactile, no mush or play. The magnification adjustment is smooth with good tension. Same goes for the parallax and illumination rings. All markings are clear and legible.

Setting zero on the elevation turret is toolless and easy. Simply flip up what Leica calls the locking toggle, turn counter clockwise to unscrew and pull out the locking toggle from the turret. The elevation turret can then be pulled off. Reposition the elevation turret, to 0, and press down to engage the turret. Then replace the locking toggle and turn clockwise to tighten. The zero on the windage turret is set using the same method.

Below is an image of the locking toggles flipped up.
View attachment 7313835

Elevation locking toggle removed.
View attachment 7313836

Elevation turret removed.
View attachment 7313837

Setting the zero stop is very easy and quick but does require the use of the supplied allen wrench. You can see the zero stop in the image above. It's on the upper brass piece.

Below is an image of from the Leica manual on setting the zero stop.
View attachment 7313838


The allen wrench is hidden under the windage locking toggle. Below is an image of the windage turret with the locking toggle removed to expose the allen wrench.
View attachment 7313839


Below are 2 pictures of the elevation locking toggle, removed.
View attachment 7313841

View attachment 7313842


Parallax was easy to set. The parallax ring only has numbers at 20 yards and 100, marks of varying width and length at other locations on the ring. When zeroing the scope at 100, the parallax ring matched up well. Adjusting the parallax at distances between 200 - 700 yards was not difficult.
View attachment 7313843

Illumination is good, but only just barely noticeable in bright midday Texas sun. The illumination ring can be turned fully in either direction, no stops, but detents for each on/off setting. There is an off setting between each of the brightness settings.

The diopter was very quick and easy to set. My eyes are old and I need reading glasses, so I had to dial a little positive on the diopter. The diopter does not have a locking ring.
View attachment 7313844


The Leica PRS 5-30x56i has a total of 32 Mils of elevation. After zeroing the scope for my rifle, LMT MWS 24" barrel 6.5 Creedmoor, with a 6 Mil Spuhr mount, I had 19.5 Mils of elevation to work with.

The elevation rotation indicator is an interesting design. As you rotate the elevation knob, the rotation indicator moves up and down, revealing the number of rotations. Below are 3 images.

Rotation indicator at zero elevation, for my rifle. Note that it is not flush with the top of the turret and the number 1 is exposed. This is due to the zero for my rifle being 12.5 Mils above the lowest possible elevation setting.
View attachment 7313845


Rotation indicator at beginning of the 2nd rotation, 10 Mils of elevation.
View attachment 7313846


Rotation indicator at 19.5 Mils of elevation. Maximum elevation for my rifle.
View attachment 7313847


Here's some technical data from Leica. It also come with lens caps, not listed below...

Battery is a Lithium 2032 coin cell.

View attachment 7313848

View attachment 7313849


I've been at the range 2 different times with this scope. Once to zero the scope at 100 yards and shoot at 200 yards. Another time to shoot from 200 - 700 yards.

I have not performed a tall target test/tracking test.

The scope was very easy to bore site at 25 yards and zero at 100 yards. The corrections that I needed to make were measured with the reticle and the amount of correction dialed on the turrets matched.

Here's one of the pictures I took while zeroing the rifle at 100 yards. Ammo used was Hornady American Gunner 140gr BTHP. LMT MWS 24" barrel, 6.5 Creedmoor, 6 Mil Spuhr mount.
View attachment 7313850


At 200 yards, I dialed the amount of elevation indicated in the Hornady 4DOF ballistic app and made first round impact on a 3" steel target. I switched to a 2" steel target with frist round impact and then to a 1" steel target, all at 200 yards. I was able to hit the 1" target 1/2 of the time. I lost my 2" steel target after the rubber conveyer strap that it was hanging from broke.

When shooting from 200 - 700 yards, 8 MOA targets at 100 yard intervals, I was able make 1st round impacts on the targets when dialing the elevation indicated in the 4DOF app. Return to zero worked correctly. I did not have to dial any windage since the wind was at 12:00. That said, 8 MOA targets are pretty big...

I hope that this answer some of the questions that members may have about the Leica PRS 5-30x56i Ballistic Reticle.
Tono, fantastic job, I’ll be happy to read your reviews anytime. Very concise with pics to match. I love that Leica puts the hex wrench in the turret, the new Kahles offers the same. I’ve gone to the range before and have misplaced my Allen’s and can’t adjust anything - royal pain so I appreciate the attention to detail in these areas. Scope looks promising. I used to have an MWS with 20” barrel that I thought was long, your 24” must double as a pole vault 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tono

Tono

And...
Belligerents
Mar 19, 2017
495
547
99
Texas
Tono, fantastic job, I’ll be happy to read your reviews anytime. Very concise with pics to match. I love that Leica puts the hex wrench in the turret, the new Kahles offers the same. I’ve gone to the range before and have misplaced my Allen’s and can’t adjust anything - royal pain so I appreciate the attention to detail in these areas. Scope looks promising. I used to have an MWS with 20” barrel that I thought was long, your 24” must double as a pole vault 😆
@wjm308, thanks for the encouragement. Yes, the MWS with a 24" barrel and VG6 Lambda PRS 30 muzzle brake puts the overall length at 46.5". It's a beast...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wjm308

lash

Swamp Rat
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Sep 28, 2012
5,768
5,249
219
61
Central Florida
This is the first time I’ve seen this thread and anything about this scope. So yes, I live under a rock.

I would like to see this scope for myself side-by-side with the ATACR 7-35.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuperChop

Tono

And...
Belligerents
Mar 19, 2017
495
547
99
Texas
Thanks for the review, just ordered from doug but with the simple L-4A reticle.
Mile High is getting my AI AX 6mm Creedmoor ready to ship and I will have him throw in a Spuhr mount.
Doug has given me good price on S&B when he was a Dealer and Leica M-E rangefinder last year.
Wish he was a March Dealer.
-Richard
If you decide that you want to replace the provided Leica lens caps with flip-up caps, Patrick at Tenebraex gave me this information:

For the objective: 56NFCC-FCR, adapter ring and flip cover, black
https://tenebraex.com/all-products?field_tenebraex_part_number_value=56NFCC-FCR


For the ocular: UAC008-FCR, adapter ring and flip cover, black
https://tenebraex.com/all-products?field_tenebraex_part_number_value=UAC008-FCR


Details provided by Patrick:
Objective 65mm o.d. and it does list the thread spec as M62x0.6. Which would be our fit part number 56NFCC-FCR, adapter ring and flip cover, Black. 56NFCC-ARD, anti-reflection device, flip cover compatible, Black
Ocular 44mm o.d. The best fit is likely UAC008-FCR, adapter frame ring and flip cover, Black, although UAC006-FCR might be needed. The 44mm is rounded and in what we have discovered with Leica likely actually 43.5mm.
These would be my recommendations solely based on the information provided. If you decide to go ahead, you can order direct through our website using the part number search http://tenebraex.com/all-products.
Our three main distributors in the US are Mile High Shooting, EuroOptic and Midway USA. If you should not find these on their website, please call or email them with the part numbers provided and they can order the product for you.
I contacted Jon at Aadmount about providing lens caps for the Leica PRS 5-30x56i, but have not received any response...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: spelunk

AFancyPenguin

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Jun 26, 2019
224
65
34
MN
Ok, I am looking for a new scope for nrl22. I'm torn between this and the zc527. Both have the adjustment and close focus I want and I don't hate the prb reticle but I do like the Zc527 mpct2 option better. Is the zc527 worth the extra 1k? Is it that much better? Especially now with the deal with a free spuhr mount I am really torn.