• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Need help selecting 21st Century mandrel sizes

avastcosmicarena

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 23, 2018
149
57
So, I've read & watched a lot of videos about the benefits of switching over to using a mandrel die + mandrel for expanding the internals of the neck before bullet seating, and I want to get into this.

I want to start with .223 to get used to it, and later on, as long as I like how it works, I'll start doing it for 6mm also.

The problem? I'm not really sure which mandrels to buy.

I don't want to get into neck turning right now. I just want to use the mandrel prior to bullet seating to get the right amount of tension. However, I've seen some people recommend using the neck turning mandrels instead of the expander mandrels.

I've also seen that 21st Century offers precision mandrels that incrementally step up in size .0005" at a time so you can really get exactly the right tension you want


Here's a video about them:

Unfortunately, it looks they only offer these precision mandrels in stainless steel, whereas they offer the regular expander & turning mandrels in some more slick coatings (Black Nitride & Titanium Nitride).

So, these are my questions:
- Should I go with the precision mandrels instead so I can more precisely dial in tension?
- If so, I don't want to buy the entire set. If I were to select 3-4 of them, which would be the most ideal sizes to go with?
- Alternatively, it might be more important to just have a slicker finish and go with the regular mandrels. Maybe, I could get what I need just by going with the neck turning mandrel instead & also get it in Black Nitride or Titanium Nitride at the same time?
 
I cant answer all your questions as i only have the neck turn arbor with titanium Nitride but i have found it works well for me using 6.5 creedmoor lapua brass. I get 2 thou neck tension after running the arbor down the neck after sizing with a bushing die. It has greatly increased the consistency of my seating pressures. Before that i gave the k&m expander mandrel a try but i was only getting half a thousandths of neck tension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avastcosmicarena
I cant answer all your questions as i only have the neck turn arbor with titanium Nitride but i have found it works well for me using 6.5 creedmoor lapua brass. I get 2 thou neck tension after running the arbor down the neck after sizing with a bushing die. It has greatly increased the consistency of my seating pressures. Before that i gave the k&m expander mandrel a try but i was only getting half a thousandths of neck tension.

Thanks for the info. Do you have any problems with sticking with the TiN finish or does it work pretty well?
 
I run a little bit of imperial sizing wax on the inside of the case mouth to make it easier and smoother but i didn't have any problems using it without.
 
So, I've read & watched a lot of videos about the benefits of switching over to using a mandrel die + mandrel for expanding the internals of the neck before bullet seating, and I want to get into this.

I want to start with .223 to get used to it, and later on, as long as I like how it works, I'll start doing it for 6mm also.

The problem? I'm not really sure which mandrels to buy.

I don't want to get into neck turning right now. I just want to use the mandrel prior to bullet seating to get the right amount of tension. However, I've seen some people recommend using the neck turning mandrels instead of the expander mandrels.

I've also seen that 21st Century offers precision mandrels that incrementally step up in size .0005" at a time so you can really get exactly the right tension you want


Here's a video about them:

Unfortunately, it looks they only offer these precision mandrels in stainless steel, whereas they offer the regular expander & turning mandrels in some more slick coatings (Black Nitride & Titanium Nitride).

So, these are my questions:
- Should I go with the precision mandrels instead so I can more precisely dial in tension?
- If so, I don't want to buy the entire set. If I were to select 3-4 of them, which would be the most ideal sizes to go with?
- Alternatively, it might be more important to just have a slicker finish and go with the regular mandrels. Maybe, I could get what I need just by going with the neck turning mandrel instead & also get it in Black Nitride or Titanium Nitride at the same time?


The "Turning" mandrel is .002" under the specific caliber and the "Expanding" mandrel is .001" under the specific caliber. Buy the size that is .001" larger than your desired final neck ID. Most shooter want .002" or .003" of neck interference. Personally I think the .0005" increments is unnecessary unless you are trying to dial out the runout in their turning lathe. I highly doubt you're going to see any appreciable difference in performance incrementally between .002" and .004" of neck interference. Your really don't need four different mandrels, pick one of the two and make sure your sizing die is at least .002" less than the mandrel.

ETA: Every coating and material of mandrel will still gaul brass unless you lubricate it. I have stainless, TiN, and carbide and they all get brass build up of you use them dry.
 
I would get the TIN turning and expanding arbor.

And .002 under and up to your caliber and all the .0005 in between
This.
The TIN is worth it but I still use a tiny bit of lube.
I use .002 under which I believe is the standard expander for neck turning.
Plenty of neck tension even for gassers in 223.

Nice for getting new brass to a decent neck tension as well.
 
So, what do you all think about the video from the F Class guy I posted in the original post? He seems to prefer much less neck tension than most people, though he does admit that he has friends who use more than he does and have no issues. Any thoughts?
 
So, what do you all think about the video from the F Class guy I posted in the original post? He seems to prefer much less neck tension than most people, though he does admit that he has friends who use more than he does and have no issues. Any thoughts?

F class = dropping round in by hand and chambering in a controlled manner

PRS = running bolt faster with mag feed

Too little neck tension in prs style shooting, if the bullet makes contact with fees ramp or anything (even too much dirt or carbon) it can be pushed further into casing.

Same line of thinking with jamming lands in prs. If you have to extract that live round, there’s a chance of bullet pulling out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avastcosmicarena
I use the size the turning mandrels are as I settled on getting .002 tension and it being the best all around. Plus you'll drive yourself nuts trying to get everything to be the same with tiny custom increments.

After firing a round I'll bring the neck back down within .002 or so of the bullet size with a Redding bushing die. Then open it up slightly to the .002 tension via the turning mandrel as this process has proven to overall be more consistant than with a bushing alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avastcosmicarena
Ok, so using a 223 Remington case for example you would use a .223 diameter mandrel after you resize.
This will typically bring the neck inside diameter to .222 as the brass will spring back some giving you .002 tension.
 
F class = dropping round in by hand and chambering in a controlled manner

PRS = running bolt faster with mag feed

Too little neck tension in prs style shooting, if the bullet makes contact with fees ramp or anything (even too much dirt or carbon) it can be pushed further into casing.

Same line of thinking with jamming lands in prs. If you have to extract that live round, there’s a chance of bullet pulling out.
I have seen the bullet extraction happen on a PRS stage, shooter was out of commission for that stage
 
I would get the TIN turning and expanding arbor.

And .002 under and up to your caliber and all the .0005 in between

It seems like others are suggesting just skipping the expanding mandrel and only using the turning arbor. Any particular reason to have both?
 
The turning arbor will be .221 or .002 under. This is what I use in my setup after FL sizing to uniformly expand case necks. I have the Tin finish mandrels and have great results without having to lube. They also have a black nitride finish that is supposed to be even better. I have one on order for my 6mm but have not received it yet to give feedback.
Basically, with 21st arbors, the expanding or “E” is .001 under and the turning “T” is .002 under.
 
F class = dropping round in by hand and chambering in a controlled manner

PRS = running bolt faster with mag feed

Too little neck tension in prs style shooting, if the bullet makes contact with fees ramp or anything (even too much dirt or carbon) it can be pushed further into casing.

Same line of thinking with jamming lands in prs. If you have to extract that live round, there’s a chance of bullet pulling out.
The pulling projectiles from a jam is a myth if you are running 2 thou neck tension. It only happens if you are running very little or no neck tension. I run a jam on both my prs rifles and I've extracted hundreds of rounds and never had one move let alone be pulled out
 
The pulling projectiles from a jam is a myth if you are running 2 thou neck tension. It only happens if you are running very little or no neck tension. I run a jam on both my prs rifles and I've extracted hundreds of rounds and never had one move let alone be pulled out

Did you not read the scenario/watch the video in which he was asking about??
 
It seems like others are suggesting just skipping the expanding mandrel and only using the turning arbor. Any particular reason to have both?
Yeah
If your neck turning, also the .001 is nice on some new cases with massive amounts of neck tension as with spring back it puts tension in a better place than the .002 sometimes.
 
If you use a Expander mandrel your case neck will be .002 under bullet diameter, if you use a Turning mandrel your case neck will be .003 under bullet diameter.
 
Did you not read the scenario/watch the video in which he was asking about??
Yes I did and I had nothing to say that hadn't been covered and I also read through first to see if anyone had already commented on the myth that you were portraying but they hadn't.
 
Did you not read the scenario/watch the video in which he was asking about??

If people actually read before posting, this forum would have about 75% less posts. Imagine if the search function was used, it would be a ghost town around here. This thread was wrapped up in the first five or six responses.
 
Get the PMA Tool carbide expander mandrel. The one I have mics .2227”

The neck springs back a bit and I end up with .002” neck tension.
 
Bought the Black Nitride turning arbor and die for it. Will test this out with .223 for a while before deciding whether or not I need any other arbors/mandrels or getting the same for 6mm.
 
Bought the Black Nitride turning arbor and die for it. Will test this out with .223 for a while before deciding whether or not I need any other arbors/mandrels or getting the same for 6mm.
Any feedback if the Black Nitride is worth the extra cost?
 
Just an FYI, I emailed 21st on actual sizes.

"Thanks for reaching out to us! Our Black Nitride mandrels and arbors generally add .0002 to the raw stainless material. The 6.5 Expander is .2632, while the arbor is .2622. The 30 Cal expander is .3072 while the arbor is .3062. Int he past our mandrels/arbors had no issue in the sinclair body, but as of late there have been some fitting issues. I would suggest you use our body just to be sure."
 
Black Nitride mandrels and arbors generally add .0002 to the raw stainless material.
Good to know. Great people/customer service at 21st! I spoke with Kevin and decided on the Caliber Specific mandrels with their body after getting this info.