Someone murdered Charlie Kirk

Ok, curious then, in Revalation. When speaking of Israel, Jerusalem, Damascus, the 2 Prophets, the 144,000 (12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of Israel, who is he speaking about?

When you go to the Quran and the Suni for Islam, and the Mahdi aka the 12th Imam (their Savior, our anti-Christ) makes a 7 year peace agreement with the Jews / Israel. and then breaks it, invades Israel, sit in the temple in the place of God. and then slaughters the Jews and all who won’t covert to Islam, who are they speaking of?

View attachment 8771288View attachment 8771289

See below. This thread is not the place.
Start a dispensational theology thread.

Hey dude. Im not the one making claims that Jews aren’t Jews, Israel isn’t the Israel of the Bible, Christians have it all wrong. I’m Just offering a rebuttal. It’s called a conversation. I know it doesn’t line up with e current Jew hate narrative. We can drop it, but that’s a 2 way street.👊🏻
See above. This thread is not the place. Someone may get their feels hurt and this thread would get deleted.
If you really want to discuss it. Start a thread or a multiple people PM (preferably)
 
The only source for the “no exit wound” seems to be Candace Owens and she’s saying that somebody else told her and offered to show her a video but never did. Which smells like a lot of the other youtuber bullshit.

Tbh I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of the conspiracy bullshit is from agent provacateurs.
Don't get me wrong, where he was hit even a .22 would leave an exit wound.

We're being fed a barrel of horse shit. As usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
See below. This thread is not the place.



See above. This thread is not the place. Someone may get their feels hurt and this thread would get deleted.
If you really want to discuss it. Start a thread or a multiple people PM (preferably)
You suffer from reading comprehension problems? I responded to your comment. This is the Pit bub, since when are we worried about someone’s feelers getting hurt and threads getting deleted? And who’s feelings are your worried about? It’s definitely aint Jews or Israelis.…Half this freakin thread is about Jews. I just posted something a few of you didn’t like.. you guys will get over it.

Now we can both agree that we can get back to Charlie Kirk and radical leftist that deleted him.

Just to refresh your memory ⬇️⬇️⬇️

IMG_5625.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lange Carabine
Agreed. This ain’t some sofisticated Mossad / Israel / CIA operation.

Tranny loving radical leftist probs got involved with a radical leftist group and got pumped up into taking out Charlie with his grandpas hunting rifle. Definitely more people involved but I’d guess it’s nothing more than an Antifa type.
ultimately likely what it was. there are enough reasonable questions and some off the wall. the issue is IMHO that we voted for open,truthful transparent detail on significant events. we haven't gotten it since early 20th cent. as tax paying,voting citizens,i believe we are owed by the gov answers to any question,no matter how outlandish. because a pair of "conservatives" are running the FBI that doesn't change. the bunch that were investigating concerned GS mothers is still employed. do you think their world view has changed? their willingness to play NKVD changed? doubt anything has changed. so,no,any wild assed conspiracy theory has long legs until they can show their honesty. JFK,RFK,MLK,9/11,OKC,Tonkin,Pearl Harbor,Iraq +++ all await clarification. not holding my breath.
 
His decorticate movement was from upper motor neuron injury of midbrain, not spine. Was that cavitation from bullet energy or angle of trajectory?

don't doubt it. cutting into or transecting a major artery-carotid,subclavian,axillary,bracheal etc will beat spinal injury as COD. might not even be obvious in field but until autopsy. ok,this guy is an expert. whether or not Charlies movement was decorticate posturing or not is still an open question but sure not a hill to die on. the guy was murdered for his opinions. this doc put that point in a perfect way.
just asking,does this have some bearing on the events themselves? angle of attack,wound dynamics? re Iryna the attacker,method and effect are obvious. with Charlie seems several issues are in doubt. not the outcome in either.
 
Last edited:
You do t believe in private business then.

You should be able to serve or not or rent to or not whoever you want to.

it’s gotten bad enough you can’t “discriminate based on income source “ in some states. Aka you have to rent to section 8



Your thinking is what takes absolute rights and leads to assault weapon bans. And blatant 4th violations like twig pigs “let me see your papers”, truck inspection extortion stations , and boating “safety inspections”


The constitution is clear. The 1st 2nd 4th etc don’t have asterisks after them

The I suggest you stop bitching about it on a gun forum and take it up with the courts.