good question.What about using civilian cargo transports to attack. What kind of precedent does that set?
then again we invaded iraq on a bunch of lies about wmds, so i suppose we can just lie about anything and get away with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!
Join contest Subscribegood question.What about using civilian cargo transports to attack. What kind of precedent does that set?
Yeah but I think we generally operate from marked military vehicles.good question.
then again we invaded iraq on a bunch of lies about wmds, so i suppose we can just lie about anything and get away with it.
What about the attacks on the children's hospital?What about using civilian cargo transports to attack. What kind of precedent does that set?
Both US an Nato have smoked hospitals & milk factory's, so whats your point?What about the attacks on the children's hospital?
On the morning of July 8, 2024, Russian missiles hit Ukraine's largest children's hospital, Okhmatdyt, and other civilian facilities in the capital, Dnipro, and Kryvyi Rih.
![]()
![]()
Ps.
whataboutism
Etymology
From English whataboutism. This tactic was used by the Soviet Union in response to criticism, when the response began with the expression "А как насчёт..." ("What about..."), followed by a mention of somewhat similar events in the Western world. For example, in response to criticism of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, there was a mention of nuclear accidents in the USA
Excellent worker from Olgino.
The manual, as we see, has not been changed since the times of the USSR.
After work, go to the officer and ask what to do if you are caught using the standards.
ukraine has long operated like the pals, hiding weapons in schools and things like that (allegedly).Yeah but I think we generally operate from marked military vehicles.
Not civilian cargo transport to launch an attack.
Afganistan, we blew up schools that we built in the first place, with F-16's.Both US an Nato have smoked hospitals & milk factory's, so whats your point?
I just have issues of people who will point out that "this person didn't serve", and use it to fault that person, but yet they themselves didn't serve either, so it kinda the pot calling the kettle black.It's interesting because there are a lot of virtue signalers in the world who get their panties in a twist over the idea that some people don't want to be in the military.
I just have issues of people who will point out that "this person didn't serve", and use it to fault that person, but yet they themselves didn't serve either, so it kinda the pot calling the kettle black.
VN, was Kennedy’s war, a Democrat. Johnson prolonged it, Once committed, the right, said well, kick the crap out of the Communists, and win this motherfucker.gonna get me a flaming,but. the outcome of VN war shows that the hippies and such were right all along. the reasons and motivation of different groups and individuals varied greatly. many groups and individuals were quite "pro war". VN,women's lib,drugs,civil rights,sexual revolution,huge welfare additions all hit society in MOL the same time frame and were and still are very divisive.
to me has been odd,considering all that,that so many rep,rt wing,conservative Americans have become anti war. meaning anti wars of choice and empire,not anti defense. guess that is in line with the realization by many of us that the government is corrupt at unbelievable levels,abusive and exploitative at USSR levels.
Disagree, Kennedy did not want the war. Elements of the democratic party & all of the MIC did. LBJ lite afterburner, as he was deep, deep, deep into defense stocks. When Ike was in it was advisors only starting about 58 & JFK wanted to pull those but the claws of the MIC were deep,...VN, was Kennedy’s war, a Democrat. Johnson prolonged it,
that is exactly right. what i was trying to get across about changes in attitudes is that in the 60s anti war was anti American. now it seems that many very pro American interest types are anti war. ie the wars of choice that we have been in since and including VN.this and much much more like it is why all the congress toads all all so Uke enraptured. Putin has paid them off in the past,as we know. doubt he's in the mood these days. so,their graft has to come from Ukraine,usually via our own MIC.
this is most likely correct, and at least one possible reason for why the cia killed him.Disagree, Kennedy did not want the war. Elements of the democratic party & all of the MIC did. LBJ lite afterburner, as he was deep, deep, deep into defense stocks. When Ike was in it was advisors only starting about 58 & JFK wanted to pull those but the claws of the MIC were deep,...
Kennedy was playing the game too.Disagree, Kennedy did not want the war. Elements of the democratic party & all of the MIC did. LBJ lite afterburner, as he was deep, deep, deep into defense stocks. When Ike was in it was advisors only starting about 58 & JFK wanted to pull those but the claws of the MIC were deep,...
not an uncommon belief. can't say you are wrong. Kennedy did have a big piece of VN. i really don't think he would have gone the 5.5 mil troop commitment. he has been quoted as saying he would pull everyone out. hard to know the truth there. many people my parent's age felt he would have been impeached if his screwing around and drug use got out. that stuff was known but not well known til in the late 80s. maybe impeachment or get voted out in early 60s when "greats" were the controlling voter demographic? never happen now with Clinton escapades and Obama's crack smoking BG action. Trump is trying a well as anyone could. i admire trump's essentially personal courage. i'm not happy with some of his stuff. that said,what are our options? bottom line-we're done for,staying the lines as we are doing.Kennedy was playing the game too.
![]()
Cable 243 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I personally think if he had not be killed Vietnam would have blown up on him too. Would he have gone full Johnson?
I also think Kennedy would have been remember much differently if he had not be assassinated. Like a Carter or a Biden.
![]()
1963 South Vietnamese coup d'état - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Disagree, he was playing the hand the war hawks & MIC dealt him. He admitted on that tape he made a mistake. It was LBJ who really kicked it off in 1965 and lobbied for the Social Security trust fund that was bulging at the seams to be rolled into the general funds to pay for the war. It was after that S/S went on a down hill ride. Not saying JFK was perfect, far from it, but he did not want or own that war,...Kennedy was playing the game too.
Yeah he was heavy into pain pills wasn't he?not an uncommon belief. can't say you are wrong. Kennedy did have a big piece of VN. i really don't think he would have gone the 5.5 mil troop commitment. he has been quoted as saying he would pull everyone out. hard to know the truth there. many people my parent's age felt he would have been impeached if his screwing around and drug use got out. that stuff was known but not well known til in the late 80s. maybe impeachment or get voted out in early 60s when "greats" were the controlling voter demographic? never happen now with Clinton escapades and Obama's crack smoking BG action. Trump is trying a well as anyone could. i admire trump's essentially personal courage. i'm not happy with some of his stuff. that said,what are our options? bottom line-we're done for,staying the lines as we are doing.
l'd argue sending a cabal that results in a coup, that destabilizes a country is a pretty big error, regardless if he admits it. For 10 years prior the South had been keeping the north at bay. This coup destabilized the south. He owns that fuck up. This action IMO resulted in the need of US forces to hold things together. He holds a large part of the responsibility pie for causing it.Disagree, he was playing the hand the war hawks & MIC dealt him. He admitted on that tape he made a mistake. It was LBJ who really kicked it off in 1965 and lobbied for the Social Security trust fund that was bulging at the seams to be rolled into the general funds to pay for the war. It was after that S/S went on a down hill ride. Not saying JFK was perfect, far from it, but he did not want or own that war,...
Funny how past mirrors the present.looks to be several diff opinions/outlooks. not a surprise or a poison pill. some merit,some error everywhere in the past and in our current disaster.
Do what you can, if you win it's all good and if you lose it doesn't matter.What about using civilian cargo transports to attack. What kind of precedent does that set?
We will not leave a single military plant. Everything will burn.
PS.
As long as the budget for Olgino is allocated, their comments will not depend on reality.
Degenerate, I understand that it's difficult for you to understand, but this is already an answer for something like this.
Remember there were lots of war mongers long before JFK entered. Ike had warned about this in his last speech. JFK failed when he believed those around him, that were supposed to be trusted SME's. I don't hold that war against him, I hold those that Ike warned about for it for presenting the spin/bait that so many of us got caught up in, until we were smart enough to think for ourselves. I entered in 1964 and started seeing things in 1965 that even this 17yo dumb ass farm kid from Indiana questioned, but was told you're not old enough to understand these things. That might have been true, but the follow on's opened my eyes more & more. Then one day I remembered IKE's message, w/o a boggy man, real or created,...l'd argue sending a cabal that results in a coup, that destabilizes a country is a pretty big error, regardless if he admits it. For 10 years prior the South had been keeping the north at bay. This coup destabilized the south. He owns that fuck up. This action IMO resulted in the need of US forces to hold things together. He holds a large part of the responsibility pie for causing it.
Many rave at that strike, I view it as their 12/7/1942, and like us they will step up their game,...
How did Pearl Harbor end. ?and do what exactly? blindly terror bomb more civilian population centers? surely that will protect their strategic assets! It will work this time!
And, that he publicly stated that he planned to "break the CIA up into a thousand tiny pieces".........this is most likely correct, and at least one possible reason for why the cia killed him.
he signed an order in october 1963 to start withdrawing forces from south vietnam. he did not survive november.
You'll find out soon enough. If I was you I'd be stocking the strongest sun block I could, as either FAE & U235 style weapons don't care who you are when they pop.and do what exactly? blindly terror bomb more civilian population centers? surely that will protect their strategic assets! It will work this time!
I respect the opinion and perspective. With the consideration we all have outside pressure from trying to push us, sway opinions. I am doing it right now for example. Relating to Kennedy, he also had people around him that did not want to push the 63 coup, even mentioned Washington was divided on it, Robert McNamara, being one of them.Remember there were lots of war mongers long before JFK entered. Ike had warned about this in his last speech. JFK failed when he believed those around him, that were supposed to be trusted SME's. I don't hold that war against him, I hold those that Ike warned about for it for presenting the spin/bait that so many of us got caught up in, until we were smart enough to think for ourselves. I entered in 1964 and started seeing things in 1965 that even this 17yo dumb ass farm kid from Indiana questioned, but was told you're not old enough to understand these things. That might have been true, but the follow on's opened my eyes more & more. Then one day I remembered IKE's message, w/o a boggy man, real or created,...
Red, White, & Blue, still runs thru my veins, but I now have check points before blindly allowing passage, for/to action on my part.
That is one guy I'd have gladly went to prison over, if I could have got close enough to. I hated him more than FondaRobert McNamara, being one of them.
Eh… has kinda a terrorist vibe to it.Do what you can, if you win it's all good and if you lose it doesn't matter.
Modern warfare has less defined boundaries and limitsEh… has kinda a terrorist vibe to it.
How did Pearl Harbor end. ?
Modern warfare has less defined boundaries and limits
Shouldn’t you be out recruiting for the effortundeveloped forebrain spotted
Many US states have hospitals that treat your illness, some even have special wards within them. Even within those there are special rooms. We have one reserved for you as they have read your shilling & propaganda here & believe they can treat you.How much Hoppes no 9 are you huffing to see a strike on military targets, resulting in zero civilian casualties, 3 years into a hot war as comparable to an attack on a country not currently at war resulting in massive loss of military and civilian life? "Muh Pearl Harbor!" is some serious sensationalist retardation. Yesterday it was "they didnt need those old planes anyway!" Holy shit old man open your windows, you clearly need some ventilation lmao