• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Ukraine war Bullshit.

Here is the real, and actual truth- Russia will NEVER derive any benefit from those acres of pounded mud, but will continue to pay a HEAVY price- every single day.
Oh so you admit that for Ukraine to win, they need to make it unappealing for Moscow to continue. I agree. So how the fuck does poking Russia in the nuclear deterrent achieve that? How does galvanizing the Russian people behind their war machine achieve that? This is exactly what I'm saying. Ukraine was reckless and stupid to conduct that operation, and deserves to lose the war for it.
 
Not true- you reject the mainstream because your handlers direct you to do so.

This is the VERY FIRST STEP to radicalization.

Hey, kid- are you still following your lame ass cleric at the local mosque? Where did that get your dad? Running a chain of stationery/ candy stores in small town America? I got some FIRE right here on this Anwar al Awlaki mixtape...

just like...

Hey, kid- aren't you sick at this point of getting your news from the television? How annoying are those shows that come on after- the spelling one, and that smartypants blue thing? Why don't you digest this fakeness on my blog, and we can rage against reality together and call the truth fake, and repeat the same lies together...

Then you distill those groups down... allowing them to self-select, and self-victimize... a BLM group becomes the Black Fist of Houston and the deepest circle is being trained to flippity-dooh-dahh out of handcuffs (fake) and the next most radical layer is being told "Film everything! Don't let any angle go undocumented for any minute!"

...and so you get your viral vid of an American getting shot by a cop at a protest. Minus one American and plus societal destabilization points added to the board. It's how they get their puppet candidates in office too.

How do I know that you guys have a specific traumatic event in your lives that made you unplug from the mainstream and pursue a path of radicalism, and also tense relationships with your families, who still live in the real world?

That's why this place is SO DAMN DELISH as well- I don't even need to ask these personal-interst research questions, because they are offered willingly by the membership.
this is how they flipped the regime in ukraine. change my mind. this was a basic function of usaid...funding this kind of shit.



by now everyone knows you're a shill, so you might as well accept that.
 
Oh so you admit that for Ukraine to win, they need to make it unappealing for Moscow to continue. I agree.

Ukraine wins by default.

Russia thought that they were going to make Z-man flee, raise the Hammer and Sickle banner over the capital in 3 days, and rule over Ukraine and its people.

They have been enduring daily slaughter for years now- sometimes intense.

All the Soviet armor they had left over is destroyed.

All their elite units were killed off long ago.

All their professional units are down to a skeleton crew of frightened and soon-to-be-killed animals led by aloof Generals in golden palaces in Moscow, jockeying for power.

Their jails are empty of lives to squander.

Buryats are extinct.

The Kadyrovites already looted enough toilets to deal with their shit and have left the battlefield.

Iran has deserted them in favor of their own regional power struggle, and even if they still wanted to help the Rooskies, the Rooskies can't pay due to sanctions.

Putin is begging the NORKs for bodies and shells, because the "shell hunger" is very real.

So how the fuck does poking Russia in the nuclear deterrent achieve that? How does galvanizing the Russian people behind their war machine achieve that?

Does Russia have any nukes that aren't covered in 30 years of bird shit, and still work? I'll bet if he pushes the button, they would detonate right in place rather than launch. :)

Putin is also a lot more popular here, among The Deceived, than he is among his fellow Rooskie Animals. Wait until he tries to tap the Moscow suburbs for his next group singled out for extinction...

Eventually, he will die bloody in a ditch at the hands of his own people- just like The Brother Leader did.

^ His greatest fear.
 
Ukraine wins by default.

Russia thought that they were going to make Z-man flee, raise the Hammer and Sickle banner over the capital in 3 days, and rule over Ukraine and its people.

They have been enduring daily slaughter for years now- sometimes intense.

All the Soviet armor they had left over is destroyed.

All their elite units were killed off long ago.

All their professional units are down to a skeleton crew of frightened and soon to be killed animals led by aloof Generals in golden palaces in Moscow jockeying for power.

Their jails are empty of lives to squander.

Buryats are extinct.

The Kadyrovites already looted enough toilets to deal with their shit and have left the battlefield.

Iran has deserted them in favor of their own regional power struggle, and even if they still wanted to help the Rooskies, the Rooskies can't pay due to sanctions.

Putin is begging the NORKs for bodies and shells, because the "shell hunger" is very real.



Does Russia have any nukes that aren't covered in 30 years of bird shit, and still work? I'll bet if he pushes the button, they would detonate right in place rather than launch. :)

Putin is also a lot more popular here, among The Deceived, than he is among his fellow Rooskie Animals. Wait until he tries to tap the Moscow suburbs for his next group singled out for extinction...

Eventually, he will die bloody in a ditch at the hands of his own people- just like The Brother Leader did.

^ His greatest fear.
lol, and hunter's laptop is russian misinformation, right? you're a joke or a retard. you choose.

the french don't trust their own news outlets, and i don't blame them.
if fact, french news suggested the riots last weekend were caused by a soccer match, and the riots started before the game.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Eostech and 232593
Did you hear anything about Ukraine striking a Russian submarine?

Soviet submarines sink all the time- it's completely unfair to blame this on Ukraine just because Putin is trying to grab some pounded mud in their east at the same time.

Even when they don't fold up and collapse at depth, they all have leaky reactors that kill off the crew (slowly).

Fun fact about the Soviet Navy up to today- they melt down reactors all the time and scuttle them all over the world. Google it.

...and despite what our own Navy Nukes will tell you- it's VERY hard to get a reactor to runaway on a warship, and they are usually only using a very small % of the power available at any given time.

Rooskie Animals have no clue in the world how to handle THE NUCLEAR, and they never did.

:ROFLMAO:

Tom Clancy wrote fiction.
 
@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB

OK, seriously I am a free speech absolutist. But you three clowns have to the be DUMBEST three people I've ever seen on this website. And that's saying something, we've had some weapons-grade idiots on here. I would actually support banning kalashnikev on the basis of stupidity alone.

I hate to smack you in the face with the truth, but here it is. Ukraine cannot defeat Russia in an existential war. Its not possible. Ukraine can only survive, by prolonging the conflict beyond the Russian resolve to continue. Thats it. There is no scenario where when the dust settles, Russia is gone and Ukraine exists. But Ukraine no longer existing is a very real possibility.

Russia can turn Ukraine to radioactive dust the minute it decides to. It has chosen not to, because logically no-one really wants to see nuclear war. Except Ukraine, apparently. Why the hell, when your only way to win is for the Russians to get tired of war, would Ukraine do something like attack Russia's nuclear arsenal? That's fucking braindead! The only reason Ukraine isn't already glowing in response is because you don't have any nuclear weapons. In other words, Ukraine is NOT a real threat.

This is not the modern day Agincourt, its the equivalent of a woman slapping a man and then strutting around because he stood there and took it. As proof of that, if the USA hit 40 Russian nuclear bombers like that, Armageddon would already have happened, because that would have been a real threat to Russian existence.

Ukraine's only hope to outlast Russia was western backing. Americans are sick of sending money to Ukraine already. You think we're gonna roll over there and defend you if the gloves come off? Fuck that! We can't even muster enough political support to win our own wars, WTF makes you think we'll come over there and win yours for you? And Europe can't afford to buy the amount of viagra it would take for them to get a boner again. Without the US, you think NATO can do anything? After this debacle, if I were Trump I'd call Putin as tell him we're done with these assholes, you march westward and we'll bomb Kiev for you, you can have it. Russian control of Ukraine would be a safer world then allowing Zelinsky to continue.
excellent synopsis of reality. hate answering the trolls. but here is my take on we MAGA like posters here. we don't all agree on every issue which is called freedom of speech and belief. American vets and non vets of varying age have awoken to the fact that most of what this gov has been doing for > 100 years was not being done for the American "people" or America. who benefited is a separate long discussion. many,not enough,Americans are realizing that all of these wars,esp Ukraine,have had nothing at all to do with "defending" America. the wars of choice over the last 100+ years,and i include WW1 & WW2 in that bunch,are for the benefit of those referred to above. and they have provided no security or defense in reality. eg the recent border invasion,admitting of numerous spies from our "friends" and enemies,sending trillions of $ overseas to guard our "allies",esp those in Europe. the propaganda that says "we have to stop XYZ because" has lost some of it's power. the level of media driven,purposeful social distractions remains active and unfortunately still successful.
i still puzzle at the high degree of activity of our Uke trolls. i mean,what is the gain for those that fund them? they are not active here in a group that has much real power and is a small minority of the population at large. so,WTF? inquiring minds want to know.
 
Soviet submarines sink all the time- it's completely unfair to blame this on Ukraine just because Putin is trying to grab some pounded mud in their east at the same time.

Even when they don't fold up and collapse at depth, they all have leaky reactors that kill off the crew (slowly).

Fun fact about the Soviet Navy up to today- they melt down reactors all the time and scuttle them all over the world. Google it.

...and despite what our own Navy Nukes will tell you- it's VERY hard to get a reactor to runaway on a warship, and they are usually only using a very small % of the power available at any given time.

Rooskie Animals have no clue in the world how to handle THE NUCLEAR, and they never did.

:ROFLMAO:

Tom Clancy wrote fiction.
Wasn’t asking you. If I wanted to listen to an asshole I’d fart.
 
Ukraine wins by default. Yes, by surviving. By not poking "The Bear" and goading Russia into heretofore unseen resolve to destroy you.

Russia thought that they were going to make Z-man flee, raise the Hammer and Sickle banner over the capital in 3 days, and rule over Ukraine and its people. This didn't happen because of American support, and because Russia made the same mistake the USA has made repeatedly, going in half-hearted.

They have been enduring daily slaughter for years now- sometimes intense. So has Ukraine. You are even more out of bodies than Russia is.

All the Soviet armor they had left over is destroyed. With American Javelins, paid for by me. And we're sick of paying for this idiocy.

All their elite units were killed off long ago. Using American arms and ammo and Green Beret training.

All their professional units are down to a skeleton crew of frightened and soon-to-be-killed animals led by aloof Generals in golden palaces in Moscow, jockeying for power. And yet you can't seem to take back a single foot of the territory Russia has gained. Why is that?

Their jails are empty of lives to squander. Oh I'm sure Russia mourns this one.

Buryats are extinct. World doesn't care.

The Kadyrovites already looted enough toilets to deal with their shit and have left the battlefield.

Iran has deserted them in favor of their own regional power struggle, and even if they still wanted to help the Rooskies, the Rooskies can't pay due to sanctions. Iran has never cared about anyone except Iran. They will always be Muslim first and only.

Putin is begging the NORKs for bodies and shells, because the "shell hunger" is very real. Because politically Putin can send NK soldiers to die and it costs Russia nothing. Because the nature of this war is who can last the longest. Something Z forgot.



Does Russia have any nukes that aren't covered in 30 years of bird shit, and still work? I'll bet if he pushes the button, they would detonate right in place rather than launch. :) Thats a very foolish assumption to make and only a complete fool would make it. The fact that Z apparently thinks this way is why he needs to be done.

Putin is also a lot more popular here, among The Deceived, than he is among his fellow Rooskie Animals. Wait until he tries to tap the Moscow suburbs for his next group singled out for extinction... Here we are again, admitting that popular support being low among Russians is essential for Ukraine survival. So galvanizing them with deep territory strikes on their nuclear capability makes sense how? An act of war that would warrant annihilation coming from any Nuclear nation. Literally the one thing that causes the end of Ukraine fastest is the Russian people deciding that's what they want. And you just gave them a 9/11.

Eventually, he will die bloody in a ditch at the hands of his own people- just like The Brother Leader did.

^ His greatest fear. Oh please he's former KGB, he is not your normal milktoast politician. I doubt he fears anything except what his legacy will be when he is gone.

Please, refute anything I wrote above if you can. And you think WE are deceived? Your move moron.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 232593
Please, refute anything I wrote above if you can. And you think WE are deceived? Your move moron.

Are you saying Russia is "the Bear" like England is "the Lion" and we are "the Eagle?"

Russia has no say in what happens to them, or what people do to them.

The expression "poking the bear" is not relevant. If someone in Finland sneezes or Estonia farts, their whole huge country might shatter and fragment into a dozen oligarch controlled fiefdoms- all claiming no responsibility for the disastarous SMO, or any connection to the Soviets.

Russia needs to:

1) Withdraw to their own borders.
2) Worry about securing those borders (duh) before they try to capture any pounded mud, anywhere.
3) Reform their government (Commie Purge- Putin gets raped with a knife, all the Oligarchs who swindled the people following the nominal collapse back in the 90s get executed)
4) Form a BRAND NEW CULTURE.
5) Start building a normal, modern, human civilization that serves their own people instead of waking up every day in a post-Communist, Soviet hellstate and blaming all their problems on the "deeply unfair" Western-dominated rules-based international order.

Cry your eyes out that those Jav's didn't get fired into old hulks rusting in the impact area, but got used for the very purpose they were invented and manufactured for- putting Rooskie Animals in the dirt.

I hope you're ready to keep taking it DEEP, Komrade!

giphy.gif
 

As former CIA analyst Larry Johnson said Monday in an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the U.S. government would likely strive to give the president plausible deniability for an operation like this, which took place some 2,700 miles inside Russia and away from the frontlines of the ongoing war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Threadcutter308
We call them "The Deceived."

They struck out at life and they're looking for someone or something to blame. Reality is uncomfortable for them, so they look for someone to lie to them, because it helps them create an alternate world to go live in- online.

In this world, Trump won the 2020 election, Joe Biden is a Cybernetic Organism, Hillary Clinton is a High Priestess of the Satanic Church, the painter guy at Home Depot is a foreign invader criminal terrorist - but Larry Hoover of the Black Gangster Disciples was unjustly persecuted by institutional racism in the judicial system, and... this one is wild... Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is a master of strategy and power, dealing with the "deeply unfair" rules-based international order and simply trying to re-exert his influence over his "Zone of Special Privilege" (the Soviet Sphere).

When they repeat these lies - TOGETHER - it bonds them tightly because they know that Barack Obama wasn't born in Kenya but they're all telling the same lie and it makes them feel good, not rejected.

They study these lies harder than they've ever studied any subject in school, and they rehearse and repeat them to try and get better in making the Kremlin's talking points, Beijing, J-state Hasbara, BLM, etc...

That's what you're seeing here- Commie Shitholes hating America and rehearsing their threat messaging... from all the different sources... in allll the different threads.



In truth, I've personally seen more than 12 destroyed assets of different types, and it might actually be 100% (and beyond) of their air-ready, FMC, not-deadlined fleet.



Why is it always the illiterates?

vi·al
/ˈvī(ə)l/
noun
noun: vial; plural noun: vials

a small container, typically cylindrical and made of glass, used especially for holding liquid medicines.

vile
/vīl/
adjective
adjective: vile; comparative adjective: viler; superlative adjective: vilest

extremely unpleasant.

...


I don't actually think that these are St. Petersburg IRA Operators who have poor English skills- these are the deceived, who sought out the liar, and who consume the lie enthusiastically.

In America though, we HATE the Liar and we LOVE the Truth.

 
@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB
Virtue signaling, Preemptive shielding & Ad Hominem
OK, seriously I am a free speech absolutist. But you three clowns have to the be DUMBEST three people I've ever seen on this website. And that's saying something, we've had some weapons-grade idiots on here. I would actually support banning kalashnikev on the basis of stupidity alone.

That's cool you believe in free speech, me too, but calling everyone who disagrees with you dumb/democrat/hitler/maga/antifa/nazi/privilaged etc. is a rather reductive use of free speech and doesn't help prove a point when you're capable of coherent thought and conversation.
@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB
Strawman

Ukraine cannot defeat Russia in an existential war. Its not possible. Ukraine can only survive, by prolonging the conflict beyond the Russian resolve to continue. Thats it. There is no scenario where when the dust settles, Russia is gone and Ukraine exists. But Ukraine no longer existing is a very real possibility.

A point I never argued
@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB
Emotional appeal

Russia can turn Ukraine to radioactive dust the minute it decides to. It has chosen not to, because logically no-one really wants to see nuclear war. Except Ukraine, apparently. Why the hell, when your only way to win is for the Russians to get tired of war, would Ukraine do something like attack Russia's nuclear arsenal? That's fucking braindead! The only reason Ukraine isn't already glowing in response is because you don't have any nuclear weapons. In other words, Ukraine is NOT a real threat.

Russia could launch nukes, sure, to accomplish what exactly? Russia uses those exact model of bombers to lob cruise missiles from safe distances into civilian population centers. Valid targets, successful strike, russia cries about "muh nooks!" and zigger appologists pearl clutch while the US and every NATO member is better for having less pieces the opposing side has a chess board. What percent of military hardware and soldiers KIA/WIA constitutes a threat? What do you consider a threat? Does having one nuclear weapon make you a threat? I don't understand your point, and won't revert to ad hominem, even though you opened up with one, and immediately went into a strawman.

@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB

False equivalence

This is not the modern day Agincourt, its the equivalent of a woman slapping a man and then strutting around because he stood there and took it. As proof of that, if the USA hit 40 Russian nuclear bombers like that, Armageddon would already have happened, because that would have been a real threat to Russian existence.

I like analogies too. This is more like the United States launching a blitzkrieg on mexico, aiming for regime change in Mexico City, but being beaten back to within 30 miles of the border after three years and losing 54 strategic bombers in Alaska, Washington and Maine in a single day to FPV drones piloted in Cancun.

@nkk , @kalashnikev , @SNB


We can't even muster enough political support to win our own wars, WTF makes you think we'll come over there and win yours for you? And Europe can't afford to buy the amount of viagra it would take for them to get a boner again. Without the US, you think NATO can do anything? After this debacle, if I were Trump I'd call Putin as tell him we're done with these assholes, you march westward and we'll bomb Kiev for you, you can have it. Russian control of Ukraine would be a safer world then allowing Zelinsky to continue.

Which war did the US lose because of a lack of political support, and not undefined, unrealistic and unachievable political objectives by military means? MCDP-1, Warfighting qoutes Carl von Clausewitz;

"The political object is the goal, war is the means of reaching it, and the means can never be considered in isolation from their purposes"

Establishing a beacon of feminism and democracy in Afghanistan was never going to happen, nor propping up a puppet government in South Vietnam.

You're also wrong to think I'm a Ukrainian, and after watching a non-NATO, neighboring country completely dismantle the image of the big iron bear to be a rotted corps of military mismanagement and kleptocracy I'm not convinced russia is a credible threat to anyone besides trying to bumrush Estonia and failing miserably at this point. They seem content throwing human lives into machine guns in true russian fashion though, so you have to give them credit for their consistency.
 
That's cool you believe in free speech, me too, but calling everyone who disagrees with you dumb/democrat/hitler/maga/antifa/nazi/privilaged etc. is a rather reductive use of free speech and doesn't help prove a point when you're capable of coherent thought and conversation.


A point I never argued


Russia could launch nukes, sure, to accomplish what exactly? Russia uses those exact model of bombers to lob cruise missiles from safe distances into civilian population centers. Valid targets, successful strike, russia cries about "muh nooks!" and zigger appologists pearl clutch while the US and every NATO member is better for having less pieces the opposing side has a chess board. What percent of military hardware and soldiers KIA/WIA constitutes a threat? What do you consider a threat? Does having one nuclear weapon make you a threat? I don't understand your point, and won't revert to ad hominem, even though you opened up with one, and immediately went into a strawman.



I like analogies too. This is more like the United States launching a blitzkrieg on mexico, aiming for regime change in Mexico City, but being beaten back to within 30 miles of the border after three years and losing 54 strategic bombers in Alaska, Washington and Maine in a single day to FPV drones piloted in Cancun.



Which war did the US lose because of a lack of political support, and not undefined, unrealistic and unachievable political objectives by military means? MCDP-1, Warfighting qoutes Carl von Clausewitz;

"The political object is the goal, war is the means of reaching it, and the means can never be considered in isolation from their purposes"

Establishing a beacon of feminism and democracy in Afghanistan was never going to happen, nor propping up a puppet government in South Vietnam.

You're also wrong to think I'm a Ukrainian, and after watching a non-NATO, neighboring country completely dismantle the image of the big iron bear to be a rotted corps of military mismanagement and kleptocracy I'm not convinced russia is a credible threat to anyone besides trying to bumrush Estonia and failing miserably at this point. They seem content throwing human lives into machine guns in true russian fashion though, so you have to give them credit for their consistency.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: mosin46
Are you saying Russia is "the Bear" like England is "the Lion" and we are "the Eagle?"

Russia has no say in what happens to them, or what people do to them. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

The expression "poking the bear" is not relevant. Why not? Its exactly what Ukraine just did. If someone in Finland sneezes or Estonia farts, their whole huge country might shatter and fragment into a dozen oligarch controlled fiefdoms- all claiming no responsibility for the disastarous SMO, or any connection to the Soviets. WTF does this sentence even mean or have to do with the poking the bear?

Russia needs to:

1) Withdraw to their own borders. Why should they, they are currently winning.
2) Worry about securing those borders (duh) before they try to capture any pounded mud, anywhere. See #1.
3) Reform their government (Commie Purge- Putin gets raped with a knife, all the Oligarchs who swindled the people following the nominal collapse back in the 90s get executed) Ukraine can't currently force Russia to take one step backwards, how will you ever decide who governs them?
4) Form a BRAND NEW CULTURE.
5) Start building a normal, modern, human civilization that serves their own people instead of waking up every day in a post-Communist, Soviet hellstate and blaming all their problems on the "deeply unfair" Western-dominated rules-based international order. Communism has consequences, and their people have lived them. At the same time, Russia is no longer a communist threat and has been unfairly treated as one for decades now.

Cry your eyes out that those Jav's didn't get fired into old hulks rusting in the impact area, but got used for the very purpose they were invented and manufactured for- putting Rooskie Animals in the dirt. They were made to keep America safe and you're lucky we share our toys.

I hope you're ready to keep taking it DEEP, Komrade! Ahh, homosexual accusations, the hallmark of intelligence in an argument.

giphy.gif

You are exposed as a complete idiot. (But not by me you did that a long time ago.) You have failed to rebut my argument that the worst thing Ukraine could have done is give Russia a 9/11. Because you know I'm right.

If you have anything at all intelligent to say on this subject I'd love to hear it. I'm not hanging around to find out though, I'll check back later. This could take awhile I figure.
 
the fact that the deep state spent hundreds of millions to convince us that russia was the enemy leads me to the conclusion that they are not.

I think if folks read a little more about Catherine the Great, the Pale of Settlement, and similar tales from the other 108 countries - they'd realize that while Russia may not be our friend per se, we do share some common problems; and if we worked together some of those problems could be exposed and maybe solved.
 
You are exposed as a complete idiot. (But not by me you did that a long time ago.) You have failed to rebut my argument that the worst thing Ukraine could have done is give Russia a 9/11. Because you know I'm right.

If you have anything at all intelligent to say on this subject I'd love to hear it. I'm not hanging around to find out though, I'll check back later. This could take awhile I figure.
He also failed to refute your earlier previous statement as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Namekagon
I think if folks read a little more about Catherine the Great, the Pale of Settlement, and similar tales from the other 108 countries - they'd realize that while Russia may not be our friend per se, we do share some common problems; and if we worked together some of those problems could be exposed and maybe solved.
Wasn’t on of their Czar’s friendly with Lincoln?
 
You have failed to rebut my argument that the worst thing Ukraine could have done is give Russia a 9/11.
Wouldn't a 9/11 be flying jet liners into civilian skyscrapers? I thought the zigger lovers in here equated destroying their strategic to pearl harbor? But wouldn't that be full scale bombing a naval/air base and killing +2400 troops while not currently engaged in a hot war? Or are we just throwing out memorable bad things? Is the attack on the Kerch bridge the holocaust of bombings?
 
Russia can turn Ukraine to radioactive dust the minute it decides to. It has chosen not to, because logically no-one really wants to see nuclear war. Except Ukraine, apparently.
Yes, everyone knows this - Russia gave up the world's 3rd nuclear potential and signed the Budapest Memorandum because it did not want a nuclear war.
Unlike Ukraine, which has been looking for excuses to attack all this time.
It gathered all its troops on the borders of Russia, supposedly for training. All world leaders started calling Zelensky and warned him many times not to do this. That it would be a disaster.
But unfortunately for the world, Zelensky did not listen to anyone and declared that he would capture Moscow in three days and would denazify, demilitarize everyone there and generally punish them for trying to carry out decommunization.
Offended by the encroachment on the sacred, he said so -
we will show you "decommunization"
And at the end of his speech, Zelensky added - why do we need such a world if there is no Ukraine in it?...
After that, everything flew in this direction.
I'm tired of explaining this to everyone here, but it seems like it should be like this, let everything go to hell, all of you.

OK, seriously I am a free speech absolutist. But you three clowns have to the be DUMBEST three people I've ever seen on this website
Соси хуй, Ваня.
 
Last edited:
I would postulate that U.S. SF is active there and has been for some time. U.S. biolabs as well. Massive money laundering. Ukraine is a honey pot of corruption for the west.
Bro even the russian troll farms completely gave up on the biolab narrative after like a month and move to other talking points
But if you're talking about the evil HATO mercenary biolab supersoldats fighting for nazi ukraine regime, I'm on board, Ive seen the photos, here I'll share this one with you (top secret please dont share)
1748970358234.png
 
The United States, through BTRP, has invested approximately $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites. BTRP has improved Ukraine’s biological safety, security and surveillance for both human and animal health. By supporting safer and more effective disease detection, this assistance directly improved Ukraine’s COVID-19 response. BTRP partners with the World Health Organization, the World Organization for Animal Health, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other health institutions in providing this assistance.
https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/11/2002954612/-1/-1/0/FACT-SHEET-THE-DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE'S-COOPERATIVE-THREAT-REDUCTION-PROGRAM-BIOLOGICAL-THREAT-REDUCTION-PROGRAM-ACTIVITIES-IN-UKRAINE.PDF
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC and 232593
I would postulate that U.S. SF is active there and has been for some time. U.S. biolabs as well. Massive money laundering. Ukraine is a honey pot of corruption for the west.
Remember that allegedly “former” Navy SEAL that died there a while back? Did you happen to catch Tucker Carlson’s Shawn Ryan interview?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redlion
That's cool you believe in free speech, me too, but calling everyone who disagrees with you dumb/democrat/hitler/maga/antifa/nazi/privilaged etc. is a rather reductive use of free speech and doesn't help prove a point when you're capable of coherent thought and conversation.


A point I never argued


Russia could launch nukes, sure, to accomplish what exactly? Russia uses those exact model of bombers to lob cruise missiles from safe distances into civilian population centers. Valid targets, successful strike, russia cries about "muh nooks!" and zigger appologists pearl clutch while the US and every NATO member is better for having less pieces the opposing side has a chess board. What percent of military hardware and soldiers KIA/WIA constitutes a threat? What do you consider a threat? Does having one nuclear weapon make you a threat? I don't understand your point, and won't revert to ad hominem, even though you opened up with one, and immediately went into a strawman.



I like analogies too. This is more like the United States launching a blitzkrieg on mexico, aiming for regime change in Mexico City, but being beaten back to within 30 miles of the border after three years and losing 54 strategic bombers in Alaska, Washington and Maine in a single day to FPV drones piloted in Cancun.



Which war did the US lose because of a lack of political support, and not undefined, unrealistic and unachievable political objectives by military means? MCDP-1, Warfighting qoutes Carl von Clausewitz;

"The political object is the goal, war is the means of reaching it, and the means can never be considered in isolation from their purposes"

Establishing a beacon of feminism and democracy in Afghanistan was never going to happen, nor propping up a puppet government in South Vietnam.

You're also wrong to think I'm a Ukrainian, and after watching a non-NATO, neighboring country completely dismantle the image of the big iron bear to be a rotted corps of military mismanagement and kleptocracy I'm not convinced russia is a credible threat to anyone besides trying to bumrush Estonia and failing miserably at this point. They seem content throwing human lives into machine guns in true russian fashion though, so you have to give them credit for their consistency.
Seriously, ad hominem attacks?? You have done nothing but call Gunfighter grandpa, or boomer, or whatever. No real argument with him at all, just names. I called you an idiot because you are one, and told you why you are. Strawman? Seriously??? Its not a strawman argument to say Ukraine can't win, just survive. Its the truth. And here we discover the fundamental problem with your position. You have not accepted as truth that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia.

I do concede you are correct that Russia isn't the military power we thought it was before this war. But I have another question...I grew up watching Boris Yeltsin follow Bill Clinton around like a puppy dog like once a week on TV. While the soviets were clearly our enemy before the collapse, Russia clearly wasn't our enemy when I was a kid. So when did they become the enemy again?
 
Yes, everyone knows this - Russia gave up the world's 3rd nuclear potential and signed the Budapest Memorandum because it did not want a nuclear war.
Unlike Ukraine, which has been looking for excuses to attack all this time.
It gathered all its troops on the borders of Russia, supposedly for training. All world leaders started calling Zelensky and warned him many times not to do this. That it would be a disaster.
But unfortunately for the world, Zelensky did not listen to anyone and declared that he would capture Moscow in three days and would denazify, demilitarize everyone there and generally punish them for trying to carry out decommunization.
Offended by the encroachment on the sacred, he said so -
we will show you "decommunization"
And at the end of his speech, Zelensky added - why do we need such a world if there is no Ukraine in it?...
After that, everything flew in this direction.
I'm tired of explaining this to everyone here, but it seems like it should be like this, let everything go to hell, all of you.


Соси хуй, Ваня.
I never said Russia didn't start it. I also never said Russia was right to invade. I disagree with both.


What I said was it was stupid for Ukraine to beg the west to pay for their defense against a former super-power and then act like that former super-power can't still wipe them off the map with the push of a button, and in the process drag the world into a world-ending conflict. Guess what, I don't give a big-enough shit about Ukrainian freedom to go that far. So stop being dumbasses and pushing the world to the brink, because if you don't its safer to let Putin have you. Z needs to sit the fuck down and wait for the adults to talk to HIM, because, when he starts playing with nuclear deterrents, he is out of his league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46 and 232593
That’s still a pretty significant degradation to the air component of their nuclear triad. And if a sub ended up being hit….

NOOOOOO BORTHER!!!

HODL THE LINE!!!


Attack was ineffective, and no card was played. Mother Russia is stronger with no people, no money, no army, and now no bombers.

Wouldn't a 9/11 be flying jet liners into civilian skyscrapers?

Perhaps one of the most DELISH elements of Operation Web is that it exclusively and very precisely targeted military assets and deleted them.

Rooskie Animals heard about something called computer vision and thought they could put old Soviet tires on the wings to confuse autonomous attack platforms.

1748971890911.png


In the real world- those only helped them identify the Soviet strategic assets.

You could have parked an Aeroflot passenger plane right in between those tire-buried bombers and it would have been safe.
 
Wouldn't a 9/11 be flying jet liners into civilian skyscrapers? I thought the zigger lovers in here equated destroying their strategic to pearl harbor? But wouldn't that be full scale bombing a naval/air base and killing +2400 troops while not currently engaged in a hot war? Or are we just throwing out memorable bad things? Is the attack on the Kerch bridge the holocaust of bombings?
Ukraine gave Russia a 9/11, as in an event that galvanizes the citizens behind the desire to make war. They did so with an attack that changed their position on the battlefield fucking zero. It gained Ukraine NOTHING. Not a foot of ground. Not another day. Nothing. But it sure pissed Russia off. Great move. Why should we fund you again?
 
NOOOOOO BORTHER!!!

HODL THE LINE!!!


Attack was ineffective, and no card was played. Mother Russia is stronger with no people, no money, no army, and now no bombers.



Perhaps one of the most DELISH elements of Operation Web is that it exclusively and very precisely targeted military assets and deleted them.

Rooskie Animals heard about something called computer vision and thought they could put old Soviet tires on the wings to confuse autonomous attack platforms.

View attachment 8701120

In the real world- those only helped them identify the Soviet strategic assets.

You could have parked an Aeroflot passenger plane right in between those tire-buried bombers and it would have been safe.

Instead of cheering on the war from the comfort of your home like it's a sports team, why aren't you over there fighting?

 
It should also be noted, the lack of a severe response by Russian President Vladimir Putin to yesterday’s attack on Russian air force bases likely indicates President Putin has what he wants. These terms and condition sheets were created prior to the Ukraine attack on Sunday. These are Putin’s conditions to stop further military conflict.
In Section II containing the “Ceasefire Conditions” (below) Russian President Putin demands Ukraine conduct democratic elections (#7, #8). Putin seemingly knows western installed President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will lose and as a consequence weaken the western influence operations. Both President Trump and Secretary Marco Rubio have previously advocated for the same.
Russia-Terms-1.jpg

Russia Presents Ukraine with “Term Sheets” for Cessation of Hostilities and Ceasefire – Part Two: #8 and #9 are Funny
 
  • Like
Reactions: 232593
NOOOOOO BORTHER!!!

HODL THE LINE!!!


Attack was ineffective, and no card was played. Mother Russia is stronger with no people, no money, no army, and now no bombers.



Perhaps one of the most DELISH elements of Operation Web is that it exclusively and very precisely targeted military assets and deleted them.

Rooskie Animals heard about something called computer vision and thought they could put old Soviet tires on the wings to confuse autonomous attack platforms.

View attachment 8701120

In the real world- those only helped them identify the Soviet strategic assets.

You could have parked an Aeroflot passenger plane right in between those tire-buried bombers and it would have been safe.
IMG_7864.jpeg