Rifle Scopes USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

[scullti]

I've been looking over the many different options for a high end scope for my first build, and I think that USO would probably be the best option for my needs. My build is will fire a cartridge based on the 7wsm cartridge, and I'll use it to ranges out to 1000 yards. I wanted to know which magnification would be best, 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x? Or maybe even the 5-25x? It's about a 500 dollar upgrade from 3.2-17 up to 3.8-22, and then another 200 dollars on top of that to get the 5-25. Is the extra coin worth it, or will 3.2-17 cut it at 1000 yards? I found a thread earlier where some people commented that there 3.2-17 magnification wasn't enough power, so I wanted to get some more opinions.

(If there are other threads that have already gone over this, sorry, just feel free to point me in the right direction.)

 

[Graham]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

17x is more than enough. Consider and compare the length and bulk of the two scopes before you make a final decision.

 

[pc3]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

I would personally lean towards the 22x if 1000 yards was my main intention but 17x will do it.

 

[scullti]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

Is a magnification much beyond 17x pretty rough for mirage?

 

[Graham]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

It depends: during the hot days of summer I end up dialing down and shooting between 12x and 15x most of the time. But some days, when there is no mirage, having 22x is convenient. There's no correct answer.

 

[scullti]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

I see your point. I've read that some of the guys on here like to keep it to a relatively minimum power range because of the mirage issue. I've never shot past 400 yards myself, so once I get this build together I'll be exploring completely new territory. I guess what it comes down to is do I want to pay for the convenience of having the 22x on a good day. I'm still not sure.

 

[LoneWolfUSMC]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

I went with the 3.2-17x

The 22x is five CM longer and four ounces heavier than the 17x. In reality I didn't think I would need the extra 5x for "tactical" shooting to 1K. If I was shooting F-Class I would probably sway the other way.

I am moving "up" from a 4-14x.

 

[Tims]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

I have a 3.2x17 and a 3.8x22 SN3. You will be happy with either scope. I prefer the 3.8x22. I like seeing as much detail on the target as possible. I am currently waiting for a new 3.8x22 to replace my 3.2x17. To me it is worth the 500 dollars extra.

 

[Ol Rob]

Re: USO 3.2-17x or 3.8-22x?

I hope to receive my new 3.8X22 within the next week.
Rob