Re: Wake up people
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: farmerted</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Predator and prey in nature balance each other out.</div></div>
No. In a natural state, the predator population increase lags behind the prey increase, until at some point predation increases enough to significantly reduce the amount of prey available. As prey populations decline, so do predator populations. It's not a balance, it's a perpetual seesaw.
That's in a natural state. Hem predator and prey in confined areas due to human encroachment on historical range, and proximity increases predation until both populations crash. Humans have had a profound effect on 'free' wildlife.
In addition, the wolves of the past were smaller than the wolves being introduced, as noted above. We've introduced a superpredator into a population that has no historic interaction with such a beast. Smaller wolves can take less elk, and need fewer to survive.
Wolves also have a demonstrated prey/flight response: This is why, when you read about wolf predation on domestic animals, it's often many at once. They get into a sheep pen and kill them all. If it runs, it dies. Not good for wildlife, either, though less documented for obvious reasons.
Fact: Wolves, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), had a specific population level as a goal. When that level was reached, wolves were to be delisted. Fact: Every time a state attempts to manage them as wildlife, or get them taken off the ESA species list, treehuggers take the state to court to stop it.
Summary: We've introduced an apex predator into a population insufficient to feed it, and unused to dealing with it. We've let a small, well-funded minority pervert wildlife management into a political fundraising game. Is it any wonder that sportsmen, who pay the brunt of wildlife management through license fees and Pittman-Roberts and Wallop Breaux taxes, are unhappy that generations of work to restore ungulate populations are being destroyed in their lifetimes?
I think wolf numbers should be reduced to either A) Their originally specified ESA minimums, or B) Whatever state and local biologists feel is appropriate. My target population level would be none.
Great first post on a shooting forum, BTW.
1911fan