Suppressors YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

Ishallbie O'Cullkillin

Central Coastranger
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 18, 2007
445
4
57
Oregon
I went to the gun show last week and saw a an SR25 with a can on it, make unknown. I noticed the exit hole on this can was noticeably smaller than the one on my YHM 7.62QD can. When I got home, I measured the exit hole on my YHM and found that it was .40 inches exactly. I am curious what size the exit holes are on other makes of .30cal cans as well as the .338 rated cans. Any info would be helpful.
 
Re: YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

YHM is notorious for large exit diameters, probably to keep baffle strikes to a minimum.

That being said, my 7.62 SS Phantom sounds as good as anything Ive ever heard, and also has zero muzzle flash. And I can drop a .338 bullet down through it. The large diameter doesnt seem to affect their performance.
 
Re: YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

My YHM in 5.56 is the same way. The trapped gasses can offset the round (ie downrange POI shift) I think they do it as a safety as mentioned.
 
Re: YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

.380 exit hole,. . Which brings me to the next obvious question. If Your YHM 7.62 QD Titanium Phantom allows .036" of clearance around a .308 projectile, is it reasonable to believe that I could safely use my YHM 7.62 QD with .40" exit hole to suppress a .338 projectile with .031" of clearance? I know I would forfeit any warranty or responsibility for damage or injury by YHM if I tried this.
 
Re: YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BGEFIVEFOURONE</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My YHM in 5.56 is the same way. The trapped gasses can offset the round (ie downrange POI shift) I think they do it as a safety as mentioned. </div></div>

This would not be correct, first, the projectile is long gone. Secondly, those designs that do deal with gas pathing that may effect ballistics have no correlation to bore diameter, the impact is due to isocentric gas redirect, non-timed, bore purge only baffles.

A full stack of large over bore points to:

1. A poor understanding of modern techniques to efficiently strip gas.

2. Poor craftsmanship as it relates to either stack alignment, potential sloppy final bore ream or an inability to hold tolerances.

3. A valid requirement based on ballistic trajectories present or anticipated having to do with the attachment method (QD). Here we can find graduated, trumpet, hour glass and a whole host of other bore set-ups. Just because end cap hole large does not necessarily mean the proceeding are as well. Should not be found through the whole stack.

4. Uncommon use of a "trash end cap," a technique where a sacrificial non functional final is used to protect the end of the can when extreme environments are anticipated, mostly concrete key-holing.

Lastly, if you saw that can at a show it may be a fake/show can and the end cap is just a any old hole they had in their pocket.

Matt, the jump your asking about is dependent on gas pressures as well, check with maker. Some cans do, most can't. YHM makes a .338 with wholly different specs.

http://yhm.net/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=14_18&products_id=318



 
Re: YHM 7.62 QD larger exit hole diameter?

There is 1000psi difference between the .300 win mag and the .338 ultra mag, using the highest pressure load data from the 2011 Hodgdon loading manual. The YHM 7.62 QD is rated to handle .300 wm. Should I use the can for .338 ultra mag?. . .Probably not. Could I use the can for .338 ultra mag safely? . . .Probably. Walking the ragged edge of shooting safety.