It’s totally you. You’re cherry picking sentences to get it to say what you want it to say, instead of considering the whole book and its message, probably because you’re listening to the leader of a cult and not a man of God.
I agree with you fully in your above post. I would just like to address the quotation you had from me about Daniel. (Unless you meant to be quoting the other guy, if so I apologize) Here I was not trying to give a whole theology about Daniel. This was part of an exchange between CaptNkm and several other people. He kept saying there was nowhere in scripture where we see a plurality in God. He was given multiple verses, but continued to not address them or consider them. He continued to ignore what was put in front of him with multiple OT texts. I continued to ride him on Daniel 7:3-14, because it shows the plurality he asked for. I was not trying to illustrate or interpret prophecy, I was giving it because he asked for proof of the Trinity or plurality in the OT. Here in Daniel and many other texts, it shows that. Obviously the message of Daniel is much more than this one selection, but that was not the point.
When people come in trying to proof text a limited number of verse, then build a whole theology on only those cherry picked verses, sometimes you have to throw a proof text “wrench” in their gears. This hopefully gives them pause and hopefully makes them think twice about their conclusions. Obviously this is not how I approach scripture as a whole and approach it with all contexts and redemptive story in mind, but even Jesus occasionally proof texted the religious leaders (who think legalistically like these guys) to show they were thinking incorrectly about things
