JR1200W3 said:

And this is the replacement barrel, right?

Click to expand...

Yes

Top

Top

the cz rifles come pillar bedded already. Some are plastic but others are aluminum. Mine are aluminum

Sized and swaged a 5 gal bucket of 9mm. My arm is killing me.

Someone should be talking to Hornady if the bullets are stripping the jacket. Only time it usually does this is on a really low fps load. The jacket can lodge in the barrel and the lead will shoot out the end. Never seen it on a rifle but have seen it a few times with Speer 44cal 240gr half jacket bullets. The target shooting guys would run these at about 5-600fps and it would happen. The load does not have enough power to overcome the rifling.

If anyone is interested in the 3D Part file for this Gen 3 tool, send me a PM. I made it a combo tool with a mag loader.

Next batch of Elite covers are here.

As an experiment I had some done in black anodize. Slightly darker than Graphite black Cerakote, but should be slightly harder - these will be slightly cheaper than the cerakote option too.

Cerakote in the middle in the pic of three, and on the right in the pic of two. Cerakote has the best chance of matching your factory black chassis (albeit with the normal cerakote batch variation), but the ano should be tougher.

I’m running an Aero precision solus hunter in 6.5 creedmoor, Burris xtriii 5-30, atlas cal with leg extension and a salmons river solutions Arca rail. Suppressor is a Silncerco harvester 30 on an area419 mount. Weight is 13.4 pounds.

I have a 6.5 creed bartlein 20" ss terminus zeus qc barrel with less than 200 rounds I would be interested iin trading or selling.

I don't understand why these scopes don't get more love. I really like mine. I don't care too much for the H59 reticle but this is still a pretty decent scope.

LuckyLuke80 said:

Why are you all so scared to say the name Jesus? Next you will be like the Jews saying he was not the Messiah, but just a good teacher or one of the prophets. You need to pray and ask God for a revelation of who He is. You don’t have to stay bound by the demonic lies of the trinity. That is an idea spawned by Satan himself.

Click to expand...

No I am not scared to say Jesus name. I do it everyday when I pray to the Father in the name of Jesus, just like Jesus modeled for us.

It is very ignorant of you to say that we will deny Jesus as the messiah, as a Trinitarian view actually has a true and fuller understanding of who Jesus is than you. I know exactly who He is

So much of what you have said shows how ignorant you are or Old Testament theology, church history, and the New Testament itself. You could not even articulate what the trinity was.

Just because you go around throwing around personal attacks and mis representing everything thing that has been said to you does not make you right. You and others have blatantly ignored other passages that do not suit your narrative and you repeat over and over the same tired line.

I’ll try this again like I did with the other guy who refused to actually address what was said. This is but one verse of many in the OT that show a plurality in God. We aren’t even touch the NT verses that have been overlooked time and again.

Daniel 7:13. Here we have two distinct and different figures, the Ancient of Days and the Son of man. The ancient of days is described with all the Old Testament descriptions of God and no one but God would be seated on a heavenly throne. The seen is a heavenly throne room. There the Ancient of days is seated and the Son of Man, a distant figure and person in this seen, is brought before the Ancient of Day. Then we see the Son of Man was given: “And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed.”

‭‭Daniel‬ ‭7‬:‭14‬. No one except God has that. Yet we see the Ancient of Days, who is very clearly God and many would argue the Father, giving his power and authority to the Son of Man. These are two distinct persons and both have the power and authority of God. This is also why Jesus refers to him self more than anything else as the Son of Man.

Now I want you to address, not just try to post some other verse to refute it, but actually address what is going on in this verse. I have several others that illustrate the same thing (as others have noted), but you have not actually addressed any of them. Who is the Son of Man? Who is the Ancient of Days? If they are the same person, why would the author very clearly differentiate the two as individual people in the text? Since the text clearly illustrates them as two separate people, why are they both given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God? You cannot just post another verse of this, you must address the matter in this verse

LuckyLuke80 said:

Hahahaha! The word name is singular. What is the name? Jesus. Simple.

Click to expand...

No sorry the church has never understood it that way and Jesus doesn’t say that. For 2000 years it has been understood as I have said. The burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise. Nowhere in the text of Matthew does it say or allude to that. Maybe it’s as simple as Jesus meant what he said

Need Bob Lee Swagger on this one

LuckyLuke80 said:

. If it doesn’t matter whether we say “in Jesus Name” or in the titles then why are we even having this discussion. As I mentioned a few pages ago, I am one person but I do multiple jobs- father, son, uncle, friend, truck driver etc. If I write a check I don’t write it in those titles of jobs I do, I just write my name on the line.

Click to expand...

It matters because Jesus is very clearly giving us the formula for the trinity; three distinct persons that are yet the same God. That’s why the singular word name is used. That is how the church has always understood it. And there is nothing in the text that even suggests that Jesus is making this a vailed command to baptize in his name. If he wanted them to baptize in his name he would have said baptize in my name.

Also as I said before, God was given a name in the OT, it YHWH and Jesus name literally means YHWH saves. Jesus is not the revealed name of God

Further as I said a few pages ago, using analogies about yourself having different positions does not work with God and the divine nature. Finally you just like that other oneness guy fail to address Daniel 7:9-14. I’ll post it again so you can’t ignore it, but it clearly shows a plurality in God.

Daniel 7:9-14. Here we have two distinct and different figures, the Ancient of Days and the Son of man. The ancient of days is described with all the Old Testament descriptions of God and no one but God would be seated on a heavenly throne. The seen is a heavenly throne room. There the Ancient of days is seated and the Son of Man, a distant figure and person in this seen, is brought before the Ancient of Day. Then we see the Son of Man was given: “And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed.”

‭‭Daniel‬ ‭7‬:‭14‬. No one except God has that. Yet we see the Ancient of Days, who is very clearly God and many would argue the Father, giving his power and authority to the Son of Man. These are two distinct persons and both have the power and authority of God. This is also why Jesus refers to him self more than anything else as the Son of Man.



Now I want you to address, not just try to post some other verse to refute it, but actually address what is going on in this verse. I have several others that illustrate the same thing (as others have noted), but you have not actually addressed any of them. Who is the Son of Man? Who is the Ancient of Days? If they are the same person, why would the author very clearly differentiate the two as individual people in the text? Since the text clearly illustrates them as two separate people, why are they both given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God? You cannot just post another verse of this, you must address the matter in this verse