Latest activity

remaction · Jun 23, 2025

Savage Mk II FV-SR. 16.5" threaded barrel.
Boyd's Pro Varmint - Green - with adjustable cheekpiece and tactical trigger guard and bottom metal from DIP.
Does not include the SWFA mil-quad 10x scope or rings, but they are available if the buyer wants them
$450+$25 shipping to your FFL for the gun and stock, local pickup available in SW WI.

Rudimentary ammo test pic is shown below. Left side was 5 bore seasoning shots, then 2 groups. That's all I bothered doing to test it.

isakhnov · Jun 23, 2025

@DocUSMCRetired - trying to figure out the workflow between Vector X and Tactix, would all calculation along with the profiles be on Vector X and reflected/synced to the watch, or same weapon profiles will need to be set up on a watch, and watch would do the calculation?

Lawless · Jun 23, 2025

Login to view embedded media

ipsullivan · Jun 23, 2025

ipsullivan · Jun 23, 2025

Price drop

remaction · Jun 23, 2025

Bear Creek Arsenal .22LR upper. Includes bolt carrier group.
16: barrel, I will include 2 magazines, a 10 rd and a 25 rd.
The Browning 3-9 scope (I believe this is a Bushnell Elite made for Browning based on another persons interest years ago) and Burris PEPR mount are not included but can be purchased if desired.
$230 shipped for the complete upper and mags (w/o scope and mount). Just pull the pins on your current upper and pin this one on.

redneckbmxer24 · Jun 23, 2025

1911’s and 2011’s are the best suppressor hosts but you’re not getting anything worth a shit for your budget.

For $850 and under and taking Glock out of the running I’d say a VP9T or M&P 2.0 are the two best options. USP9T’s are great too and you could possibly find a used one in your budget but I doubt it. They also aren’t optic ready if that matters to you and they also kinda suck to put a light on but as a suppressor host they’re excellent.

Wannashootit · Jun 23, 2025

I don't like removing and replacing muzzle devices routinely, especially those with fine 28 or 32 thread pitches.
Subject to stretching enough that it'll fuck up the timing when torqued down.
I'll clean the carbon off the brake and crown with shop swabs, and if I run into hard to remove shit, I'll hang the rifle upside down with the muzzle in a small cup of solvent.

JMOYMMV.

HemiPowrd · Jun 23, 2025

SRW said:
Did you shoot it? That cannon looks like it's made for the 2,000 yard challenge!

I didn't shoot it as we had to leave. Brandon did shoot it though - wonder if that'll be on the video? It's an ELR gun so definitely good out to 2000 and probably significantly more.

fx77 · Jun 23, 2025

sirhrmechanic said:
If they remove the tax, how can it stay on the NFA? The point of the NFA was that the Roosevelt admin could not ban guns. But it could require a tax stamp that always so expensive that no one could justify it.

Because it is unconstitutional for the Fed to ban something. But you can put it on a list to tax it and then never issue the tax stamp. That’s how they do narcotics, too.

So eliminate the tax and it’s an arguably unconstitutional ban.

Might be a way to backdoor remove the suppressors.

Sirhr

Even removed from the NFA , there are so many states that for bid a suppressor , and to them it would make no difference.
Save $200 on something which you cannot buy anyway.

redneckbmxer24 · Jun 23, 2025

redneckbmxer24 · Jun 23, 2025

redneckbmxer24 · Jun 23, 2025

buffalowinter · Jun 23, 2025

Namekagon said:
Also, if Iran knew that they knew and didn't say anything, that could make future alliances with Iran (or maybe even others) more difficult for Russia and China? Not that those two were ever trustworthy.

I have amended the thread title by adding a question mark.

Russia/China Intel failure?

Namekagon · Jun 23, 2025

buffalowinter said:
Who knows? Again why China/Russia would/should have informed Iran of the impending attack:

China/Russia: Hey Iran, there's a bunch of F117's headed for you nuke facilities, you might want to shoot them down.

Iran: We don't have that capability.

China/Russia: Here's a bunch of shit to shoot them down with, you got 37 hours to get ready.

Also, if Iran knew that they knew and didn't say anything, that could make future alliances with Iran (or maybe even others) more difficult for Russia and China? Not that those two were ever trustworthy.

buffalowinter · Jun 23, 2025

lash said:
I see that you haven’t yet figured out that you cannot reason or discuss anything with DildosBeforeDestruction. He is always 111% correct at all times in his own mind. No matter the topic, he is his own personal expert.

Well, he actually raises a good point. I thought this was a failure in the plot of Red October. Once we figured out what the Red October sounded like (lava anomaly) we could detect it, so why would we let the Russians know their weapon was compromised. The counter to this argument is that the Red October was a "first strike" weapon, and as such we would only destroy it after it launched. And the counter argument to that is....time to go for a run.

Namekagon · Jun 23, 2025

DeathBeforeDismount said:
It would be incredibly naive to think the Chinese and Russians do not have spotters at Whitman that translate every flight of B2s. It would also be retarded to think they don't both have satellites whose sole purpose is tracking aircraft, missiles ect. Same with Guam, DG and Qatar. When those birds move, they know.

They understand the USs SIGINT capabilities to point they know we are "probably" listening to just about everything.

What is the benefit to warning Iran? They have zero ability to stop the attack. They don't have the time to harden or move any equipment. This is not the 90s with retarded f117 predictable flights in a heavy semi modern ada environment. Israel already knocked out virtually all the ADA. Missles don't work when the radars are destroyed and the sites are vacated because people don't want to eat a HARM as soon as they light up ( which every satellite, drone, f35 and awacs would pick up as soon as they powered up, resulting in immediate launch of anti radiation fires).

Countries don't spend millions or billions on detection and counter tech to just let everyone know it's capabilities, especially in a situation like there where there is no advantage or justification to reveal.

Assuming actions/inactions in war or proxies wars is based on capabilities instead of decision making trees is foolish.

This entire thread is retardation based on an assumption that OP pulled out of his ass.

I have no inside baseball, but I bet one of the main reasons Trump seemed on the fence about using bunker busters would be showing the world how they work. If you blow up the bunkers, now the world knows you can go at least that deep. If you fail to completely demo those facilities, now the world knows exactly the limits of the weapons we have. In this case, I think the target ended up being worth it, but certainly there was an information cost to doing the raid.

sirhrmechanic · Jun 23, 2025

Blue Sky Country said:
Fuck fundamentalist scum. It is FAFO season. Anybody who is able to intercept and neutralize a muzzie terrorist in action, should scalp or cut the motherfucker's head off as well. Everything is being recorded these days so why not send out a message to the entire world that we are absolutely apeshit psycho and more vicious than a junkyard dog on crack when we are pushed to the limit. The ONLY thing some people in this world understand is terror from a display of pure berserk mode by the retaliating party.

Lube your ammo with pork fat and stuff pigskin into the hollow point... Just 'sayin!

And ears make a nice souvenir...

Sirhr

lash · Jun 23, 2025

buffalowinter said:
Who knows? Again why China/Russia would/should have informed Iran of the impending attack:

China/Russia: Hey Iran, there's a bunch of F117's headed for you nuke facilities, you might want to shoot them down.

Iran: We don't have that capability.

China/Russia: Here's a bunch of shit to shoot them down with, you got 37 hours to get ready.

I see that you haven’t yet figured out that you cannot reason or discuss anything with DildosBeforeDestruction. He is always 111% correct at all times in his own mind. No matter the topic, he is his own personal expert.

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter

Rimfire Savage Mk II FV-SR in Boyd's Pro-Varmint w/adjustable cheekpiece.

Firearms .22 LR upper for your AR

Russia/China Intel failure?​

Russia/China Intel failure?