PortaJohn
- By Longshot231
- The Bear Pit
- 162232 Replies
Go to a high school reunion then thank the Lord for unanswered prayers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go to a high school reunion then thank the Lord for unanswered prayers.
Wow fuck up a $30 wrench to weld it onto a $12 rifle.
No sarcasm needed. Do a simple comparison with most 3-DOF models, and you’ll spot the error. Want to play with 6-DOF? Be my guest. Trying to hide the sun with your hand? That’s a common attitude, while the simplest path is plain and simple QA. Angle solutions are not a mystery; the equations are well known—just look at the vector equations. As I said before, that error (and it’s a big one) has been there from day one. So go ahead and keep drawing wind diagrams instead of checking the algorithm, and unfortunately you won’t fix a thing.Hold on let me write that down.. *simple algorithmic.... error*... *6DoF not necessary* got it. Okay thanks for you help with this issue I'll pass it along to the ballisticians and app developers.
Which of the countries you regularly visit have the most/best matches?What he said pretty much. Live in germany and travel 1000km on a regular basis to get to shooting ranges in italy, poland, cz etc.
We can practice up to 300m in germany, thats it. Only stationary shooting most of the time. I try to do as much dry fire as i can to keep up. But shooting live rounds cant be compensated at a certain level unfortunately...
Holy shit…I think I’ve been there!Speaking of imported diversity... somewhere near the border of Sudan and Central African Republic:
"Good day, fellow African people!"
It's like "Where's Waldo: Cracker Edition".
View attachment 8788878
Dipshit in green sure has nice hair!
The print we have says 0.825 +/-1, where is the 822 number published? The 825 number has been standard since 2018 timeframe with the Nucleus launch and several shops, myself included, argued with Ted to make the 825 number standard and keep it for the Coups. We've never run into an issue with the Coup on headspace using 825.
Or does someone else have an old print or an incorrect reference entirely? Instead, using 825 all the numbers match up there.
I did see some early Nukes that were 822/823 range and that caused some very early, very rare issues being that we were cutting the barrels at the time to 823+/- 5 tenths since the number ARC gave me was 825 +/-1, however I haven't seen anything like that since 2018 Gen 1 Nukes.
I had a G1 and the G3 blows it away and in almost everything. I have $4000 scopes and the turrets in my G3 are at least as good as they are and as far as distinctness even better. The IQ is great for the price but not up to those expensive scopes. The .06 Mil reticle thickness can actually bee seen on lower mag compared to the older one. Like 4x in the G3 compared to 5.5x on the G1 it's looking around the same but a wider FOV on the G3 4x.I have the 1st gen of this scope , my only negative is its a 1st focal plane scope ,which is fine for punching paper but on low power the cross hair is so thin it's hard to pick up , for a hunting scope that kinda sucks for me , great glass though and I like that there's a off position between each illumination brightness click , IIRC the complaints on the gen one was the turrents were kinda mushy , I haven't noticed that on mine .