Filter

AAC ammo grenading rifles

I am not very confident about 110 SASS Actual info...

I just watched his video on the Badlands ammo v. BHA 77gr, FGMM 77gr... and his velocities for the BHA 77gr ( which he doesn't mention if it is the 5.56 load or the .223 load ) sure imply's he choose the slower .223 load for the comparison.

Heck, the 77gr FGMM load ( From all barrel lengths ) was even faster then the "choosen" BHA 77gr load.... in my experience, BHA Mk 262 is considerably faster then his reported velocities... so did he intentionally compare the slower BHA 77gr load to the Badlands Shell Shock ammo ?

I couldn't see what specific BHA he used in the video.

However, I do know the BHA Mk 262 is faster than his stated results.

It's not that I don't like him... but omitting certain specific details in the few videos I have watched, is not awe inspiring.

And more Karen Read trial bullshit

Oh Hell no.

Is illegal immigration new. Is corruption new? Yeah there are corrupt cops, and there’s a shitty corrupt system for dealing with them too. There’s no such thing as a perfect cop. But treating every cop like he’s the one that screwed all of America up is just as fair as saying all you white folk is racist…cuz the clan.

What if just guys out there trying to do a job the best they can amongst some assholes that are badge heavy corrupt pieces of caca.

Yeah the uncorrupted pigs may might be outnumbered in places, but who here is willing to do the job of a cop in today’s social justice mindset generation at the shitty pay considering the hell cops catch when god forbid they have a bad day and screw up royally on camera.

My view is quit bitching unless you’re willing to find a way to fix it -be it through reform, or legislation, or litigation, or putting a damn badge on yourself.

How about y’all show them how it’s done right?

That’ll never happen because it’s too risky and doesn’t pay enough, so get online and join a circle jerk forum. That fixes shit right?

So here’s what we’re left with when no one will step up……..


1747160710548.jpeg

PortaJohn

i hope Trump pushes this pop movement HARD. problem is the baboons in charge over there may figure it out and not let them leave. same as USSR,China,NK etc. if we brought 50K of them here and spent 10% of what was spent on the savages Obiden brought in,we would benefit,i suspect,with a noticeable increase in GDP.

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

I put borla cat back exhaust on a truck and definitely liked the results.
I’m prob one of the few people who dont opt for the “sport exhaust” on serious sports cars.

After the first hour of a 3-4 hour ride..I need a Advil…not fun anymore

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

Easy to answer. Daniel was seeing not just into the spirit world, he was seeing into the future. Of the beasts he saw we know that one was Alexander the Great and so on. The ancient of days he saw was obviously God. He also saw the son of man which is obviously a man, and that is the Man Christ Jesus. Not duality. He saw God and he saw the flesh that God would put on to save us. Read revelation 1. John describes the same thing as Daniel but calls it the Son of man. When we get to heaven we will see God. He will be sitting by himself on ONE throne. He will have scars in His hands, feet, and brow. And we will bow down and worship him.
But that is not how Daniel reads. And I am not worried about the prophetic part. I want you to read it carefully and pay attention to the context. Specifically this:

““I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him.”
‭‭Daniel‬ ‭7‬:‭13‬ ‭ESV‬‬
https://bible.com/bible/59/dan.7.13.ESV

There is a fixed scene, it is a throne room. It is not seeing the same person just in the past then in the future like you said. It is not seeing God, then seeing the flesh in the future. This is happening all in one moment, this is import. You have the Son of Man come to the Ancient of Days and he is presented before. Then you have the Ancient of Days giving the Son of Man all of his power glory and dominion.

There are two distinct people here, this is happening in the same moment. How could God be presented before himself if he does not have distinct persons? How could God give something to himself, if he does not have distinct persons? If this was a vision of God with no persons, it would just be the ancient of days going down and become the Son of Man, that is not what is happening. Here The Son of Man is not the Ancient of Days, and The Ancient of Days is not the Son of Man, yet both are given attributes of God.

Additionally, the long standing understanding of this verse in the early church was these were two distinct persons yet one God. So your argument falls flat linguistically (again) as well as historically (again).

You always have this problem when you try to apply the modalism heresy to scripture the New Testament there are numerous examples that show Jesus interacting with the Father even Praying to Him. Why would Jesus be praying to himself. When he is dying on the cross, why would he call out to Himself, ABBA Father. I will go more into one specific verse deeper because it was used to refute the modalism (sebalianism) heresy by Origen and others in the 100s (yes way before Nicea, way before Constantine this heresy was handled with Trinitarian thought straight from the Bible)

Please answer also to the Garden before his crucifixion.

“When Jesus had spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, “Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son that the Son may glorify you,” John 17:1
‭‭
Jesus isn’t praying to himself. Why would he ask himself (father) to glorify himself (son) in turn so he could glorify himself (son)

“And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.”
‭‭John‬ ‭17‬:‭5‬ ‭

Jesus is very clearly not talking about his own presence, he is asking to be glorified in someone else’s presence (the Father). This point is super clear in Greek by the way it is conjugated, but it is also plain in English. If Jesus is praying to himself, why would he be asking to be in someone else’s presence?

I could go on and on, but go read all of John 17 and Jesus prayer here to the Father. The distinct persons here are self evident in English, but in the Greek it is even clearer and linguistically impossible (as well as logically impossible) for Jesus to be praying to himself.

The fact is your position is the one that goes against the plain reading of scripture.
  • Like
Reactions: W54/XM-388

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

I am going to give an analogy here for the Trinity. Almost always these types of things are actually the modalism heresy. Like the water being liquid, solid, gas is actually modalism. It is modalism because it is one thing taking 3 forms, and each of the three states is not fully the water in every way. This is not the right understanding of the trinity. The trinity rightly understood is one God having 3 persons, all equally God and fully God, yet distinct from each other.


However this is maybe the closest analogy I have come across using human terms.

Image a dry erase board. You grab three dry erase pens of Red, Green, and blue. Now you perfect draw a red circle on top of a green circle, on top of a blue circle. Now you have all three colors making one perfect circle, however the red circle is not the green or blue circle, the green circle is not the red or blue circle, and the blue circle is not the red or green circle. However, each individual colored circle is perfectly the circle. The red circle is the circle, the green is the circle, and the blue is the circle. Also too all three together are the circle

Obviously there are some problems , like wouldn’t the colors mix? But this is the closest analogy to the trinity I have found using material ideas.

Ukraine war Bullshit.

So if as you state its, "in exchange for densely mined uninhabitable rubble are equally delusional and retarded"

Then why fight over uninhabitable Rubble.

Are you getting off on destroying Peoples homes and cities?

Seems like a Pot/Kettle kinda vib you got going.

Ukraine using cluster munitions in their own country, to essentially ensure future generations of their own kids will encounter unexploded ordinance is in a similar vein of fucked up.

An incredibly high amount of cluster munitions will remain unexploded and will be set off later - most likely by children according to statistics.