• Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Filter

Man and his dog killed by bear in Florida.

123 exit off 85 going toward Fort Walton?

Have had to stop competitions to wait for bears to cross the range on Hurlburt. One rather large specimen was called Buddy Bear. He would chew on the roof support poles trying to find termites. Watched him on video once prowling back and forth about 20 yards behind the pistol range. The lone shooter never knew he was there.

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

You are saying their are more Than one Body and More than One Spirit.... Show me ... I said there is One and Backed it with scripture

.
There you go again, not actually addressing anything that is said to you and dismissing it outright. Just because you say something is nonsense does not make it so. But that is a standard debate topic of people whose arguments have no grounding. The questions you keep asking, with how their phrasing show you do not know what you are talking about, have already been addressed. But here is a verse for you that shows Separate personhood in the OT.


Daniel 7:9-14 Here we have two distinct and different figures, the Ancient of Days and the Son of man. The ancient of days is described with all the Old Testament descriptions of God and no one but God would be seated on a heavenly throne. The seen is a heavenly throne room. There the Ancient of days is seated and the Son of Man, a distant figure and person in this seen, is brought before the Ancient of Day. Then we see the Son of Man was given: “And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed.”

‭‭Daniel‬ ‭7‬:‭14‬. No one except God has that. Yet we see the Ancient of Days, who is very clearly God and many would argue the Father, giving his power and authority to the Son of Man. These are two distinct persons and both have the power and authority of God. This is also why Jesus refers to him self more than anything else as the Son of Man.



Now I want you to address, not just try to post some other verse to refute it, but actually address what is going on in this verse. I have several others that illustrate the same thing (as others have noted), but you have not actually addressed any of them. Who is the Son of Man? Who is the Ancient of Days? If they are the same person, why would the author very clearly differentiate the two as individual people in the text? Since the text clearly illustrates them as two separate people, why are they both given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God? You cannot just post another verse over this or just say Deut 6:4, you must address the matter in this verse

Finding a wife

I must have gotten lucky in all areas. Met a wonderful young woman when I was 25, and she was 21. She was/is an outdoorswoman, Huntress, fisherwoman, seriously accomplished Kitcheneer, who works on her skills all the time, good mother, clean living, devout and humble. I liked both her parents, and grew to love them, and they loved me, mourned their passing. Get along with my brother-in-law, and am basking in the warm glow of my companion’s 51 years of devotion. She even cut my hair this morning, and still holds my hand.

Attachments

  • IMG_0089.jpeg
    IMG_0089.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 41
  • IMG_1650.jpeg
    IMG_1650.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 41

India vs Pakistan

Baghdad Bob is that you???

Kuwait, the authors of Air Land Battle doctrine, and anyone who likes uninterrupted world oil flow rates probably thought it was a splendid idea.

Your fellow communists in the Soviet Union probably weren’t fans of Desert Storm.

YOU = Commie Shithole.

You think getting attacked by the Terror Kingdoms on 9/11 was a good idea?

You think going back to Iraq to fix the problems created by Desert Storm 11 years later was a good idea?

So that no Middle Eastern country could ever wear pants, make laws in a parliament, or field an air force??

That's dumb.

Guy on motorcycle vs guy in car..... yeah.

You can’t use deadly force unless he pulls a gun from the saddle bag and the threat to your life is imminent. Gesturing toward a saddle bag is not enough. Secondly, there are other people on the road you have to think about.

See.. this is where people need to shift their paradigm. People CAN use deadly force at any moment. Most humans are emotional and irrational.

So putting yourself in a situation to let some asshat go psycho on you is in your control.

Too many people here are trying to think “legally” about the situation. Yes, the auto driver did something illegal. That’s beside the point.

If you aren’t willing to die for whatever it is that you’re arguing about then don’t put yourself in that situation.

Both of these people are at fault… de-escalation is a skill more people need to learn and practice.

Something kicking off in Israel

Israelis are confident that there they have enough kompromats of US polticians ...........

This is true, and if anyone ever says, "That's a conspiracy theory that they control our government!" just consider this- Mielkowski was the first J-Caliph who felt comfortable transforming Zionism into a partisan political issue... because he knew he had perfect control.

He flew into the United States from his shitty Terror State with a suitcase full of dirty drawers to campaign against a sitting American President and destroy an early version of the Iran Deal.

The Republicans invited him to Congress and gave him a standing ovation.

NOW... why would the Democrats place the priorities of the J-state above the national interest of America and Americans so shortly after Mielkowski attacked them?

Like... almost immediately after, Dems were right back on-board paying out our money, and providing material support to humanitarian atrocities.

1746986959088.png

7mm PRC

If I stay at or below book max of 67.5 grains of each 1000 with a 180, I think they will last indefinitely without expansion
Primer pocket expansion is invariably a result of an over pressure load. At least over pressure for that brass.

As soon as I hit 68 grains or more, the primer pockets expand

I eagerly await Lapua brass, and I will buy a couple hundred cases and be done with it for the rest of the life of this barrel. And maybe even the next barrel
I would recommend Peterson as well. I have always found them to be on par with each other.