pm sent

The hottest loads starting to show heavy extraction is normal.
The dirty cases, I’ve had it sometimes and I contribute it to the hot gases post firing mixing with the cooler maybe more humid air and immediately condensing onto the chamber, which gets transferred to the case body when it’s fired and pressed it the chamber walls.
Fold and wrap a paper towel around a jag so that it doesn’t jab through and jam it into the chamber and spin, I bet you see lots of soot come out of that chamber.

No idea on the primer crack.

Threadcutter308 said:

I feel so much safer now that I know the cops are going after the "Real" criminals.........

Fan accused of sex toy toss faces multiple charges

The man arrested for allegedly throwing a sex toy onto the court during last week's Valkyries-Dream game faces charges of disorderly conduct, public indecency/indecent exposure and criminal trespass, according to law enforcement records.

www.espn.com

Click to expand...

Now apply the same standards to a queer parade...


R

Dr. Luke Kemp
Luke is a Senior Research Associate at the Notre Dame Institute of Advanced Study, and a Research Affiliate at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) and Darwin College at the University of Cambridge. His research focuses on understanding the long run history and future of extreme global risks. Luke has advised the WHO and multiple international institutions, and his work has been covered by media outlets such as the BBC, New York Times, and the New Yorker.



He holds both a Doctorate in International Relations and a Bachelor of Interdisciplinary Studies with first class honours from the Australian National University (ANU). His first book on the deep history and future of societal collapse (Goliath’s Curse) will be published with Penguin in 2025.

Peer-Reviewed Publications:

Kemp, Luke. 2018. “Mediating the Climate Crisis”, forthcoming in “Handbook on Mediating International Crises”, eds Wilkenfeld, Jon., Beardsley, Kyle., Quinn, Dave.
Kemp, Luke. 2017. “Better Out Than In”, Nature Climate Change, 7: 458–460.
Kemp Luke. 2017. “Limiting Climate Impact of the Trump Administration”, Palgrave MacMillan Communications, 3(9): 1-5.
Kemp Luke. 2017. “A Systems Critique of the Paris Climate Agreement”, in “Pathways to a Sustainable Economy- Bridging the gap between Paris climate change commitments and net zero emissions”, eds Hossain, Moazzem., Hales, Robert., and Sarker, Tapan.
Kemp, Luke. 2017. “Is the Paris Agreement Universal and Useless?”, Australian and New Zealand Society on International Law (ANZSIL), Perspective 9.
Kemp, Luke. 2016. “US-Proofing the Paris Climate Agreement”, Climate Policy, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2016.1176007
Kemp, Luke. 2016. “Book Review: Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law, by Peter Lawrence”, Climate and Carbon Law Review 10(3): 239-240.
Kemp, Luke. 2015. “Framework for the Future: Exploring the possibility of majority voting in the climate negotiations”, International Environmental Agreements, 16(5): 757-779
Kemp, Luke. 2015. “Bypassing the ‘ratification straitjacket’: reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement”, Climate Policy 16(8): 1011-1028.
Kemp, Luke. 2014. “Realpolitik and Reform at Rio+20: The Politics of Reforming the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).” Earth System Governance Working Paper No. 30. Lund and Amsterdam: Earth System Governance Project.
Other Publications:

Kazagalis, Alex; Ward, John; Sammon, Paul; Evans, Stuart; and Kemp, Luke. 2017. “Net Zero in New Zealand: Scenarios to achieve domestic emissions neutrality in the second half of the century”, Report prepared for Globe NZ by Vivid Economics.
Kemp, Luke. 2017. Climate Report 2017: The Private Sector and Climate Finance in G20 Countries (Australia)”, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Jotzo, Frank and Kemp, Luke. 2016. “INDCs and Low-carbon Growth Strategies in Developing Asia. Asian Development Bank.
World Bank Group. 2016. “State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016”, prepared by Vivid Economics and Ecofys, Washington DC. (Head author of “Chapter 4: Building an international carbon market after Paris”). Page 3 of 3
Kemp, Luke and Jotzo, Frank. 2015. “Delaying mitigation would be costly for Australia”, Centre for Climate Economics and Policy for WWF-Australia.
Jotzo, Frank and Kemp, Luke. 2015. “Australia can cut emissions deeply and the cost is low”, Centre for Climate Economics and Policy for WWF-Australia.
Kemp, Luke; Sackett, Penny; Jotzo, Frank. 2015. “Sub-National Climate Policies: How does the ACT compare?”, ACT Climate Change Council, Canberra.

It's constant the sky is falling with these people unless the left is in charge.

You have PMs turned off?

Up

Up

As an Australian.... can you people please stop talking about suppressors?

Even my internal monologue has tinnitus.

@SigFanBoi69 , just wondering what scope mount you are running. I’m looking to change one out, and that one looks good. Thanks for any info you can add.

Barneybdb said:

View attachment 8741500

Click to expand...

And the Wally World Hyper Tough tactical gloves....

buckleboy said:

Some of us don’t want Mr. T to think his work is done!!!

Click to expand...

I pity the fool?

Bump

Bump

Bump

@Dirty D dream date .....

John L said:

Is this a the correct front sling swivel used on the M40? I know the loop is not the correct size, but the rest seems to check out. 7/32x40 thread, and the escutcheon looks right.

Click to expand...

Is there actually enough meat in the forend for that escutcheon

DeathBeforeDismount said:

300 PRC will get you 95% of the performance with 245 bergers out of a Long action using less powder, less recoil, cheaper brass and longer barrel life. Even factory ammo is like half the price.

Click to expand...

Not to hijack the thread, but I had this EXACT discussion with some dudes regarding why I wanted a 22ARC bolt gun and I cited these exact points.

I can equal the ballistics from a 26" 223 using 75gr ELD-M, with an 18" ARC and the same 75gr bullets.

Less recoil, less blast, less powder than 6mm options or SA carts, and 8" less length, less weight than my 223, making it lighter, more manoeuvrable and easier to carry. It's a no brainer to me.

I'll tell you another story where i'm the flog, but it was a good lesson (especially for me which is why I keep telling it and prefacing it with i'm the bad guy of this story).... I was at an international arms meet over a decade ago. I ended up talking to a US Army dude and a UK Army dude. Both Snipers. One running the L115 and the other running the M2010. I made a bit of a comment regarding the M2010 and going win mag over the 338 LM like the UK (and cad and aus and NZ and probably most of the rest of the western world) and I said it from a position of assumed knowledge and honestly, I was being an arrogant flog and talking down to the US Army dudes weapon and ammo from a position I hadn't earned and didn't fully understand like a right fuckwit. I can't stress this enough. The way I spoke to these 2 dudes is just an embarrassment and it's one of those core memories that pops up at 3am.... and the UK guy just absolutely rolled me with his response..... I was put in my place so fast you'd swear this dude was a Quartermaster doing a stocktake and he had a shelf dedicated to arrogant flogs.

Basically, there was nothing wrong with 300WM and what Mk248 Mod 1 provided was more than sufficient, even compared to 338LM. He then proceeded to talk about training vs equipment vs engagement range etc etc and what it came down to was that 1 MOA was the standard which means anything beyond 1200y is more ass than class so they aim for those requirements.

So if you hyper optimise what you have, whilst it might not be the best, it might be good enough, and if you try really hard, you might equal the competition or close the gap so much that it's negligible.

There are a MILLION carts out there, don't pick the IT cartridge, pick the one that works for you

Up

"As the rich extract wealth and destroy the eviroment."

Who wrote that Greta...