XP1K said:

I can't wait for the weekend. I want to see how widespread this actually gets. Personally, I don't think they have the numbers to protest every dot on that map.

The way this is all unfolding it reminds me of the the first book in the "holding their own" series.

Click to expand...

They have hordes of idiots willing to be professional idiots. they'll get at least some traction at most dots. Here's the latest Seurat (dotist painter).

waiting for the vids of Z's SS grabbing women off the street and into a van for transfer to the front.

Never quit Brother!

Page 3006....jus sayin

Told ya.

Snuby642 said:

They have conscripted " Grandpa " so stands to reason that women including " Grandma " will soon be deemed acceptable.

Whatever it takes to keep the graft flowing to thier leaders, (and ours).

Maybe some old warriors we have seen were volunteers.

Hell I will go to our own border and protect it right now.

Only one thing, I'm bringing my own muzzle devices, mostly just to

Click to expand...

Mr.BR said:

Well women to the front , equality



View attachment 8706947


Plan B seems to be next , only population cohort left to tap
View attachment 8706948

Click to expand...

jbell said:

Having owned both magnification range Match Pro ED scopes which magnification range do you prefer? Is there a difference in eye box and optical quality between the two? I expect the 5-30 to start to get tight above 24-25 power and it probably gets dark also, but below that how do they compare?

Click to expand...

That's a good question and you've been on the Hide since Christ was a Corporal so I know you'll understand this best.

I don't have a 5-30 to do a direct comparison to at this time so any opinion on that would be speculative.

Optics are all about personal preferences and so trying to provide what I think is important may not be important to you, so I will list what differences I enjoy between the two.

Here are just a few fun facts that I'll share and if I do get a 5-30 back in my hands I will do a more comprehensive comparison.

Since I do have several 3-18 MP's, this what I can tell you.

(1) I'm much prefer the size, weight and features of the 3-18 over the 5-30 and do not feel at a disadvantage running the 3-18 in PRS.

I honestly cannot recall the last time I needed more than 18X at a PRS match, the only reason I use the High Mag Gen 3 HD Razors and ATACR'S if for the added weight.

(2) The image quality is exceptionally clear through the entire magnification range, I can easily spot .224 Cal impact/groups on paper targets at 100-150 yards.

The 3-18 will clearly focus down to 11 yards.

(3) So far the reliability has been on par with the same reputation as the well-known bomb proof HDMR/ Elite Tactical line.

I had one bounce off of a razor gun rack at about 30 mph slamming into the bed loaded with T-Post and steel targets with nothing more than some cosmetic damage maintaining 100% reliability.

(4) I have 20/25 Vision with the stigmatisms in both eyes, left eye dominant but right handed.

The 3-18 has provided a huge reduction in Eye Fatigue when spending prolonged periods of time on scope. The FFP Reticle thickness to magnification ratio in the 3-18 MP Scopes is perfect IMO option, its just POP'S clear and crisp every time.

(5) Plain and simple the quality of the product in relationship to the price is unbeatable and I've found them a few times for sale around $630.

My best advice is just pick one up and see for yourself.

$ & specs?

What's the price?

Well women to the front ? equality and shit !!?






Plan B seems to be next , only population cohort left to tap

Roaming Shot is a little piece of heaven.

I was somewhat surprised one of the 13.9" skinny barrels turned in the best group of the day - the first three rounds were legitimately same hole with the Nosler. I need to play with that ammo some more - it is slow, so I've been biased against it, but so many people have told me how well it performs on meat that if it is a half MOA shooter in a very light gun... sometimes you have to listen to the universe.

Laughs in history.....

If you ever really dig into the battles, they were all small, mostly skirmishes, but any time the Mexicans had less than a 10 to 1 advantage, they were routed. We could defeat the entire Mexican military with a combat division in a weekend.

However, if we could use this as an opportunity to expand America south a few lat lines, then let's get this party started. Lot's of oil and gas just south of the border.

.

MWAlex2 said:

I always thought fat people were supposed to jolly.

Click to expand...

Fuck you!

R

What action is this on and what top sear? That is really important if you're tracking. I don't think the other poster was being condescending when he said the tt might be better suited for you. Yes the bix is damn nice, but you need to get the correct top sear first AND set up trigger as described. If that is NOT done, it will be problematic(like yours), and lead to disappointment. Maybe Jacob was having a bad day, or maybe you came off as a prick and he returned the favor. I don't know or care. I think most posters have had very positive results with BC, and most guys have tried to help you get your trigger sorted. Take a breath and unwad your britches, and we can help.

Right during rush hour. I hope if they get on the highway people steam roll them.

Threadcutter308 said:

Yeah, if you look at the map in the article, the no fly circle is SE of Columbus and only takes up a small percentage of the total land in Ohio. My guess is they meant "400 sq. miles".

Click to expand...

No.
Do people not maff anymore?
Lets do a square shall we?
60 miles long, 60 miles wide...


THAT is 3600 square miles.
Not miles square, little individual, square miles, composing roughly 640 acres for each little "block".
4000 square mile no fly zone isn't near as big as people think it is.

SMFH
....
And i got a D in geometry.

Bigjake83 said:

I picked up the New Bushnell 3-18 Match Pro, and when comparing it in a Side by Side to my Leupold MK5 3.6-18 IMO I'd say the clarity on the Match Pro is definitely better with less CA. The closest house to me is exactly 207 yards away and I can clearly make out the large Phillips head screws on his front door. The MP is brighter and seems to gather more light.

The Eye Box is extremely generous and the 15yrd parallax is very broad not anywhere near as sensitive as the MK5.

The illumination shake awake function is helpful. The Match Pro has some shared features with the MK5 such as the Rev indicator, Zero Stop, Locking Elevation, Caped widget.

The Elevation adjustment is just as Audible and tactile as the MK5 but the Match Pro windage is pretty quite but still tactile.

The Turetts are easier to read especially compared to that funky windage line the MK5 has. 40 Mils of Elevation, 14.5 Mils Windage for the Match Pro, Field of View at 3x is 41' at 100 yds and at 18x 6.8' . Has a very generous 3.9" Eye Relief.

I prefer a 34mm main tube over the Leupold 35mm because 98% of my optics are 34mm which I already have plenty options on hand for mounting.

I've had to send in Vortex, Nightforce, minox, Leupold, Burris..what shit show that was but never a Bushnell HDMR/DMR/Pro.

At only only 2oz heavier and half the price of the MK5 I feel like I've found the perfect SPR Optic. If the reliability is anywhere near as good as the Tactical Elite 3.5-21x50, it's a win.

If anyone is interested in me following up on this thread as I Stetch it out, let me know.

Click to expand...

Im just chiming in on their CS. I had to send in a HDMR2 and they were prompt and fast to replace it with their flagship xrs3 since tbey did not have a dmr in stock. This was in april of 2025.

Login to view embedded media

Ex Chief of US Capitol Police Torpedoes Nancy Pelosi's Nat'l Guard Claims About Trump​

Amish cop giving a little wake up to blonde.

Just a guess....