Protection Team Case Study
- The Bear Pit
- 7 Replies
Handled it well…. They should now be taken Out back out of view of the audience and…
Login to view embedded media
Sirhr
Login to view embedded media
Sirhr
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TonyAngel-
Thanks for the detailed response outlining why you made the decision you did. As I’ve been scouring the web for options to test and evaluate, it’s obvious several others feel the same way you do about the Gen II Razor 1-6. It’s an optic that sets the bar high for other manufacturers.
The optics you use are all well outside the criteria laid out for my consideration. The ACOG is a fixed power, not variable. The NX8 is first focal, not second. The recommended Delta Stryke scopes are MIL based.
When administrations like to see “options” before a selection is made, I like to compare a minimum of three. Right now the Gen II Razor 1-6 (VMR-2) and Tango6T 1-6 (HELLFIRE MOA) are the only two that meet the criteria I laid out in my initial post. Ikeman83 suggested the Kahles 16i (SI1) and that may just be the third option. The capped mil dials will likely be ignored outside of adjusting a zero, so an exemption to the selection criteria could be justified.
By who? Trained athletic coaches. Where do THEY get their info from? Where does ANYONE get their info from? College degrees in sports medicine? Where do THEY get their info from? The proven bad actors of the USDA or FDA? I dont know lol. And I dont know ANYONE that takes in too much sodium bicarbonate lol.Recomended by who and how did they get to that recommendation?
Secondly, not all sodium is the same, else sodium bicarbonate would give you the same increased blood pressure as sodium chloride. (It doesn't)
On cold days, coffee. On warm days, water mixed with whatever isotonic sports drink I feel like. After shooting, the coldest beer I can find.
This was another attempt to cause Russia to misstep, overreact and pull NATO in. Just like the Taurus missiles. If I can see it, surely everyone else can. We live in dangerous times. I wonder if Trump’s call with Putin was a move to de-escalate.Everything I've seen in the last 3-4 hrs says this attack on Russia might be the straw that brings two things to a head. First what trump is,... NOT,.. saying to Putin. And second the final war with the left & nwo may be on the table, with nothing off limits. Pray the deep state here, gets totally decapitated as well.
I see Trump giving the go ahead to some people disappearing, while getting his popcorn ready to watch what the Russia does to the ukes while saying,... Oh that looks bad.
I don’t know, that’s why I asked.Okay.
-Stan
Okay.I find it hard to believe those “security guards” are any kind of designated PSOs. Is that what passes for personal protection contractors now? Like calling a Muddy Girl camo Savage Axis a precision rifle.
I don’t think Putin will accept a ceasefire that allows Ukraine to resupply and gain further intel. He didn’t do it before so he won’t do it now I bet. Could be wrong, but I’m not going to Vegas to put chips on it.
TonyAngel-Bud, the question you're asking has a VERY subjective answer. I tore my hair out for over a year trying to find the perfect LPVO for me. I own or have owned every LPVO worth trying from about $2500 on down.
I have two main rigs. On one I run a TA11 ACOG with a Holosun on top and on the other a Nightforce NX8. My reasons for chosing those are subjective. From an objective point of view, considering things like field of view, the view through the objective, clarity of glass and robustness of build, I've gotta say that, for the money, the Gen II 1-6 Razor is still the one to beat.
Honestly, but for being a little heavy, I think an argument can be made for the 1-6 Gen II PST. At $500-$600, it's a heck of a scope.
In the end, I chose the ACOG for its simplicity, glass quality, size and weight, not to mention that it's bullet proof. I chose the NX8 for it's robustness of build, size, weight and glass quality. I did make sacrifices going with the NX8. Smaller field of view and tighter eye box, but it does what I need and it's so small that it doesn't get in the way.
Still, everytime I pick up my Razor, or even the PST, I'm amazed at what a shooter's optic each is. I see them as no compromise optics for their respective price ranges, at the expense of size and/or weight.
I'd start with a Razor in mind and make a list of those things you don't like about it, then find something that doesn't have those offending attributes and then decide what compromises you're willing to make. I was willing to compromise on eye box and field of view to get into something smaller and lighter.
If you don't mind the weight, the Razor is likely your answer. It may not be the absolute best choice, but it's rarely the wrong choice. It is an absolute joy to shoot with. There are two things that I don't like about it. The first is the weight, but it is what it is. The second is that it has a wire reticle. I prefer an etched reticle.
Oh, check out the Delta Stryke HD as well. Same scope as the Credo HX, but has an available mil reticle. I think the Razor is a better scope, but the Stryker is like $600 or so cheaper.
If you just want to dip your toe, find a used PST. Odds are that you'd be fine with it. Excellent 1x and good 6x. The only time I don't like mine is when I throw it on a 12.5 rig, adding almost 29 ounces and then throw on the light and suppressor and then have to carry it all around.