• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Muller report is in....

7053470
 
No sir, he is not an ass clown, he is a dick. That is why I voted for him, we need him, we needed a dick in the white house. Why? Glad you asked.

You see Trump is a dick.
And the MSM are pussies.
Congresscritter are assholes.
Now pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks go around fucking without thinking things through. Assholes just go around shitting on everything. Sometimes pussies become so full of shit, they become assholes.
Now pussies don't like dicks cause...well pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, and if Trump doesn't fuck these assholes, then no one can, and then we will end up with our dicks AND our pussies, all covered in shit!

#TeamAmerica !!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
"The idea that Trump is out of the woods on this is just not true."

quote: Bob Woodward - Washington Post - April 1, 2019
Laughing, the view from your moms basement window needs cleaning as your view seems to be so 1970's. You best research the "Bob Woodward" dart you threw thinking he is even relevant these days, again laughing,... BTW Woodward an Bernstein are still paid shills for the dnc. Keep Lapping that street shit up,...
 
A wise man once said, "An excuse is the skin of a reason stuffed with a lie".

A wise Gunfighter once told me MSM, was, "the skin of truth stuffed with lots of lies".

Several people recognize being fooled once by a lot of things, and now recognize MSM is the biggest wool puller out there, stuffing the skin of truth with a ton of lies...
EVERYBODY will pull wool to get an advantage of some sort at some point in their life...
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
only innocent retards, not evil retards.
Aw, I am sure he shot out his mommas twat like a fastball and daddy couldn't handle the slippery EMO. Bumped his grape hard on the opposite wall. It's not his fault!
 
For @vh20 and me, we would be ok if the non-believers became that black stuff between the elephants toes, just sayin... they do get on ones nerves.
My elephant is ..... ? ymmv...

Haha! Memories of all those Peter Hathaway Capstick books and columns I read as a kid immediately come to mind (Death In The Long Grass, et al).
 
  • Like
Reactions: j-huskey
Based on Nixon's Watergate crimes and Hillary Clinton's e-mails...Justice allowed the Watergate 1974 evidence and Hillary's e-mail investigation to be subject to total Congressional & public scrutiny.

I reject Barr's timeline, and I'm in full support of the demand for the release of the full 400 page Mueller Report --- as well as all underlying evidence by April 2.

"The law is clear, the House Judiciary Committee is entitled to the full 400 pages. It is up to us to demand full transparency"

quote: Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee - REP. (D-N.Y.) Jerrold Nadler


 
Last edited:
Based on Nixon's Watergate crimes and Hillary Clinton's e-mails...Justice allowed the Watergate 1974 evidence and Hillary's e-mail investigation to be subject to total Congressional & public scrutiny.

I reject Barr's timeline, and I'm in full support of the demand for the release of the full 400 page Mueller Report --- as well as all underlying evidence by April 2.

"The law is clear, the House Judiciary Committee is entitled to the full 400 pages. It is up to us to demand full transparency"

quote: Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee - REP. (D-N.Y.) Jerrold Nadler






What happens when the special counsel’s investigation is complete?

Rosenstein’s order notes that if Mueller deems it “necessary and appropriate,” he is “authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.” The federal code states that at the conclusion of a special counsel’s investigation, he must provide the acting attorney general with a confidential report explaining decisions about whether or not prosecutions are warranted. The acting attorney general could decide to make that report public. According to the code, the “Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/05/special-counsel-qa/
 
George Papadopoulous got caught in a tiny lie and I don't think anyone has suggested that he was trying to peddle influence or any other "scam" with foreign governments.

He was actually targeted by intelligence agents trying to dirty him up to make collusion seem real.

I haven't seen anything suggest he's a bad guy, he just made one bad move when he was being interrogated.


George Webb connects him to Carter Page and Scooter Libby and explains his position.

My position is based on his job - a fixer for oil and gas plays for Israel, and I am willing to consider what Webb says.
 
Last edited:
Based on Nixon's Watergate crimes and Hillary Clinton's e-mails...Justice allowed the Watergate 1974 evidence and Hillary's e-mail investigation to be subject to total Congressional & public scrutiny.

I reject Barr's timeline, and I'm in full support of the demand for the release of the full 400 page Mueller Report --- as well as all underlying evidence by April 2.

"The law is clear, the House Judiciary Committee is entitled to the full 400 pages. It is up to us to demand full transparency"

quote: Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee - REP. (D-N.Y.) Jerrold Nadler





Why not use your superpowers to get it?

I want Hillys emails but I dont have superpowers.
 
"A sudden White House change of heart: Trump doesn't want America to see Mueller's report anymore"

"As sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, we all knew Donald Trump's dalliance with transparency on Robert Mueller's findings would come to a screeching halt once someone explained to him the difference between Attorney General Barr's 4 page hack job and Mueller's 400-page-plus report. Now that Trump has learned those other 396 pages aren't all dazzling pictures of him, he's turning his ship around."

Source:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Vodoun daVinci
We are to take a known libtrad web sites word, laughing,...

"In case anyone mistook his meaning Trump twitter screamed on Tuesday morning 'NOTHING WILL EVER SATISFY THEM'

Trump topped off that tweet a couple of hours later by retweeting a Fox News clip in which Alan Dershowitz argued that Barr doesn't have any legal obligation to publicly release the the report."

Source: From same article source as my last post
 
LOL.

Just for some fun reading, here's a sample from the HRC e-mail report.

7054137
 
Last edited:
You know...that if I was big money (which I'm not), I would pay a guy like Christopher Steele handsomely if he had that kind of 'goods' on Trump.
Very, very, nice job, of outing your self,... my hat is off to you,... the only thing you need to do now for yourself is get a fork,... do you need help with what to do with it?
 
You know...that if I was big money (which I'm not), I would pay a guy like Christopher Steele handsomely if he had that kind of 'goods' on Trump.

Guess you missed the part where the original Steele Dossier was done in 2007 and was patterned to attack MCStain. In 2016, Hillary, et al, snatched it off the shelf, blew the dust off of it, changed all the names and "resubmitted" it (leaked it to the press).

So, no, Steele didn't have anything on anyone, other than what he fabricated. First it was McCain, then re-written to attack Trump, at Hillary's behest. Pee Pee Dossier ? Really ? Can't you libs do any better than that ? I laughed my ass off when I read that one. How weak. I doubt there were even very many liberals that believed that part of it.

What I cannot understand is how you liberals just continue to froth at the mouth, throwing (and believing) the most inane, insane attacks on Trump, but yet, you refuse to recognize and/or admit to any of the heinous crimes that Hillary has committed. I cannot take anything a liberal says seriously until there is some recognition of all of the terrible things that people like Hillary have done and continue to do.
 
Guess you missed the part where the original Steele Dossier was done in 2007 and was patterned to attack MCStain. In 2016, Hillary, et al, snatched it off the shelf, blew the dust off of it, changed all the names and "resubmitted" it (leaked it to the press).

So, no, Steele didn't have anything on anyone, other than what he fabricated. First it was McCain, then re-written to attack Trump, at Hillary's behest. Pee Pee Dossier ? Really ? Can't you libs do any better than that ? I laughed my ass off when I read that one. How weak. I doubt there were even very many liberals that believed that part of it.

What I cannot understand is how you liberals just continue to froth at the mouth, throwing (and believing) the most inane, insane attacks on Trump, but yet, you refuse to recognize and/or admit to any of the heinous crimes that Hillary has committed. I cannot take anything a liberal says seriously until there is some recognition of all of the terrible things that people like Hillary have done and continue to do.
TDS...

R
 
  • Like
Reactions: Threadcutter308
@TC308,

Reading your post,
on what you cant believe of liberals,
sounds very much like the words of Soviet citizens who rode the midnight Maria, and were convicted,
and sentenced to death or slave labor. Those citizens could no more believe the communists words or beliefs that were sentencing their innocent selves to death or slavery,
than you can believe the liberals believe their agenda in the face of overwhelming evidence otherwise.
The parallels are identical. We are there.
Orwell named the tactics exact in "1984". We are there.
People, like those you verbally joust with here now, would happily, dumbly, lead you to the ditch.
And a few iterations later wonder very stupidly why they were now at the ditch themselves.
The Reverend AJ would say, "BMA, BMR, and use it liberally..."
 
@TC308,

Reading your post,
on what you cant believe of liberals,
sounds very much like the words of Soviet citizens who rode the midnight Maria, and were convicted,
and sentenced to death or slave labor. Those citizens could no more believe the communists words or beliefs that were sentencing their innocent selves to death or slavery,
than you can believe the liberals believe their agenda in the face of overwhelming evidence otherwise.
The parallels are identical. We are there.
Orwell named the tactics exact in "1984". We are there.
People, like those you verbally joust with here now, would happily, dumbly, lead you to the ditch.
And a few iterations later wonder very stupidly why they were now at the ditch themselves.
The Reverend AJ would say, "BMA, BMR, and use it liberally..."

Well.......no, not really. I do believe it. What I struggle to come to grips with is how people of different viewpoints can view the same situation/circumstance/event/set of facts and draw drastically different conclusions from it. Everyone saw the same thing.

It is a matter of picking the outcome that best suits your agenda and the truth be damned. And you are right, historically, millions of people have lost their lives because of it.

edit; And look how well socialism is helping the citizens of Venezuela right now.......I saw today that there is no fresh drinking water in most cities.
 
Last edited:
Well.......no, not really. I do believe it. What I struggle to come to grips with is how people of different viewpoints can view the same situation/circumstance/set of facts and draw drastically different conclusions from it. Everyone saw the same thing.

It is a matter of picking the outcome that best suits your agenda and the truth be damned. And you are right, historically, millions of people have lost their lives because of it.


People of today have the freedom to reach any conclusion they so desire; and because ‘they’ have worked really hard to change society over the last several decades, those same people have become entitled to their opinion, while enjoying the luxury of being free from consequence of those opinions.

We’re entering a period where all those consequences have stacked up to a decision point.

At the bottom of this is how the Clinton Foundation is really organized crime. That level of crime and corruption has / is / and will continue to alter the country, away from what are the expressed core values of the nation.

The question is will Law prevail?

Just how swampy is Barr? Is Huber really gonna bring a case?

We’re all in for the ride until the 2020’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greaseoil
People of today have the freedom to reach any conclusion they so desire; and because ‘they’ have worked really hard to change society over the last several decades, those same people have become entitled to their opinion, while enjoying the luxury of being free from consequence of those opinions.

We’re entering a period where all those consequences have stacked up to a decision point.

At the bottom of this is how the Clinton Foundation is really organized crime. That level of crime and corruption has / is / and will continue to alter the country, away from what are the expressed core values of the nation.

The question is will Law prevail?

Just how swampy is Barr? Is Huber really gonna bring a case?

We’re all in for the ride until the 2020’s.

Yeah, and I've been thinkin'......Just how much should I trust Barr ? After all, he was "appointed" by the same system that "appointed" Sessions. Look how well that worked out. Huber who ? :unsure: I keep hearing Hannity saying "massive indictments tomorrow". I keep seeing posts in Breitbart and G/P that Huber is building massive cases/indictments, etc. Nothing has happened so far and I have a low degree of confidence that anything will.

You are right. Any SJW can go out and champion any cause, no matter how insignificant or trivial, using virtually any method, with no fear of any consequences. The only people that cannot get away with that are those that abide by the "law".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Honcho
Well.......no, not really. I do believe it. What I struggle to come to grips with is how people of different viewpoints can view the same situation/circumstance/set of facts and draw drastically different conclusions from it. Everyone saw the same thing.

It is a matter of picking the outcome that best suits your agenda and the truth be damned. And you are right, historically, millions of people have lost their lives because of it.

edit; And look how well socialism is helping the citizens of Venezuela right now.......I saw today that there is no fresh drinking water in most cities.
It is through the lens of pre-disposition that people reach drastically different conclusions.
Look at Darwin. Through his lens (paradigm)One long beaked-bird and poof, no God. And so the story goes. Decide what you believe, then prove it at all costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Threadcutter308
No, I think he said you're a monkey and that's what pissed you off.
 
Guys, I’m 90% sure he is trolling you.

Or it’s retarded.

Either way, a passer by doesn’t know which one the retard is....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dewey7271