nobody banned you.
you claim charlie was a hatemonger, but you cannot provide one example. telling.
Someone murdered Charlie Kirk
- Thread starter _Windrider_
- Start date
you claim charlie was a hatemonger, but you cannot provide one example. telling.
I've been on a bunch of shooting websites. @Lowlight and the Hide mods are about the most permissive I've seen, even that devil PMI
. On most you would have been gone after your first post. If youre smart, you'll learn to STFU and listen. But arent, and you wont.
As has been posted, we feel it when darkness celebrated Charlie’s murder.
On the plus side, it would leave a lot more for those left, and less draw on dwindling resources. See, I'm a greenie.
I've been on a bunch of shooting websites. @Lowlight and the Hide mods are about the most permissive I've seen, even that devil PMI
Don't even engage with them, they're all faggot retreads who've been banned a bunch of times before.
in charlie's honor, i think we should give anyone a chance to defend their opinions.
I said it before, Like JFK learned the hard way, you dont threaten the money and live.
Could that be an It/It?Ooooh a They/Them found the PIT
it'll be tough, it appears they own most of the congress. Why wont they just open the Estein files? Unredacted. Bwahahahaha why? Because most of them are in it. Shalom.
Is there any proof netenyahoo actually made that offer? Or is this more anti Israel propaganda? Honest question.
It’s bullshit.
Can you refute it? I'm open to evidence either way.
I’ve looked and can’t find anything. But a search results in about a bazillion things about both parties currently.
Short answer: public records and news reporting show several recent public contacts and statements tying Benjamin (Bibi) Netanyahu to Charlie Kirk — mainly (1) reported phone contact/invitation shortly before Kirk’s death in September 2025, (2) Netanyahu’s public tributes/statements after Kirk was killed, and (3) earlier, more informal contacts (Kirk’s visits to Israel and at least one reported meeting with Netanyahu’s son in 2019). I couldn’t find any public stash of private emails or a full transcript of direct one-on-one meetings between Netanyahu and Kirk — only the items below that are reported by news outlets and official social posts.
Reported communications / contacts (with sources)
- Netanyahu said he spoke to Kirk “two weeks ago” and had invited him to Israel.
Multiple outlets quote Netanyahu saying he had recently spoken with Kirk and invited him to visit. (See Al Jazeera, Times of Israel, Jerusalem Post). - Public statements / tributes by Netanyahu after Kirk was killed.
Netanyahu posted/published condolences and high praise for Kirk on social media and in interviews (calling him a “lion-hearted friend of Israel” and “once-in-a-generation” figure). These are widely reported (Al Jazeera, JPost, Fox News, AFP-syndicated coverage). - Netanyahu’s social post(s) on X / video posts referencing Kirk.
Netanyahu’s official X account and other Israeli government platforms carried tributes and short memories of Kirk (captured in news coverage). - A reported meeting between Kirk and Netanyahu’s son during a 2019 visit to Israel.
News reports (Fox News and others) say Netanyahu recalled that his son met Kirk during a 2019 trip. This is reported as a personal encounter rather than an official summit between Kirk and the prime minister. - Other Israeli leaders’ contacts and statements (contextual, not direct communications with Netanyahu).
After the killing, a number of Israeli ministers and public officials issued condolences and described past meetings/interactions with Kirk (Gideon Saar, Itamar Ben-Gvir, Bezalel Smotrich, etc.). Those items are reported by outlets like Al Jazeera and Times of Israel.
What I did
not
find in public reporting
- No public full transcripts, emails, or released telephone logs of private Netanyahu–Kirk conversations.
- No widely reported, formal bilateral meeting (e.g., an official sitting meeting between Netanyahu and Charlie Kirk documented by the Israeli Prime Minister’s office) beyond the personal encounter mention (Netanyahu’s son meeting Kirk in 2019) and the recent call/invitation reported by Israeli media.
Go fuck yourself you commie cunt.
@Makinchips208
Direct/primary items (public statements & social posts)
- Netanyahu’s public post on X (Twitter) praising Kirk and saying he’d spoken with him and invited him to Israel.
- Israeli press reporting Netanyahu said he had spoken to Kirk “two weeks ago” and invited him to visit; widely quoted in Israeli papers (Jerusalem Post, Ynet).
- Al Jazeera and Al Jazeera Arabic coverage quoting Netanyahu and summarizing Israeli leadership reactions.
- Reuters and other international wire services reporting on the killing and including Israeli leaders’ statements and tributes. (Arabic Reuters version plus English Reuters pieces).
- Video / social uploads (Netanyahu / Israeli foreign ministry Facebook/X posts) re-posting the condolence message and short video tributes. (Facebook video post and other social embeds).
Regional / foreign-language coverage & notable variations
- Hebrew media (Ynet, Walla, JDN, Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel) — report Netanyahu’s call/invitation line and quote longer interview snippets (e.g., comparison to Yonatan Netanyahu, emotional tributes). These give the Israeli-side framing and names of officials who issued statements.
- Arabic media (Al Jazeera Arabic, CNN Arabic, Sky News Arabia, others) — quote Netanyahu’s X post and translate his phrasing (“lion-hearted friend of Israel”) and also carry regional commentary; some outlets re-publish Western wire copy, others add local commentary.
- Fringe / regional op-eds and forums — a few regional sites and opinion pages republished rumors or speculative takes (e.g., Tunisie-Telegraph piece that raises conspiratorial angles). These are not mainstream wire reporting but show discussion in Arabic online forums. (Cite example.)
Social media, eyewitness and third-party reports
- X/Twitter: Netanyahu’s verified X post and many reposts (Israeli gov accounts, journalists).
- Facebook / Instagram: Video and reel posts from Israeli accounts and U.S. supporters memorializing Kirk and repeating Netanyahu quotes.
- Forum / niche outlets: local comment threads, pro-Israel communities and pro-Kirk communities have been actively sharing screenshots and claiming earlier contacts; some non-verified accounts claim other back-channel contacts (these remain unverified). (See Tunisian Telegraph example above).
Guys
Just flush the shithead. (Dildo)
It's taking up too much bandwidth.
Just flush the shithead. (Dildo)
It's taking up too much bandwidth.
i'm scrolling through shorts looking for hate, and can only find the guests being rude or hateful.
Or piss all over it, either work
it'll be tough, it appears they own most of the congress. Why wont they just open the Estein files? Unredacted. Bwahahahaha why? Because most of them are in it. Shalom.
Because a federal judge ruled they can’t release the files as it would impugn a bunch of people who haven’t been proven guilty of any crimes thus far.
I know that innocent until proven guilty is a tough concept for some of the retards on here but they is the reason the Epstein files have not, and probably never will be released.
Yeah, I've grown bored with him anyway. Probably one of the worst shills I've seen in over a year. Sigh.......
Releasing the Epstein files will not, and has no power to, convict any of the people mentioned.
Only a court can convict.
Under our system someone is innocent until proven guilty.
Therefore the release of documents has no legal impact on those mentioned therein, and the excuse being used is spurious.
Release them all and stop lying.
So Max Blumenthal cites a nebulous “anonymous source” and you automatically believe it?
Has it occurred to you that in the world of journalism as it currently exists, that any source who won’t go on the record equals made up conspiracy theory bullshit?
For fuck’s sake it’s been the MO of these turds for going on several decades now. Remember all the nonsense uncited sources used to gin up the Trump Russia nonsense?
Now you will fall for the same shit because it fits with a narrative you want to be true.
Seriously you lack either intellectual honesty, or critical thinking abilities.
According to the judge that isn’t the case. You can bitch and cry about it all you want, but a judge who has the authority to make that decision has already ruled.
The logic is pretty simple.
Ask yourself if your name and contact information were in Epstein’s contacts list because you were his lawn care service in NY, would you want to have your information released with no context?
Sure you will have committed no crimes, and no charges will be forthcoming much less a conviction. All the same your name and reputation will be unjustifiably covered in shit.
Maaaan, that’ll get you right in the feelers…
Last edited:
Yes. I would demand all names be released including mine because abuse, rape, and trafficking of children needs to be eliminated no matter the cost.
You have to think like a Democrat. You see anyone who disagrees with them is using hate. If you argue with the Democrats it’s hate speech.
well,Savage has always been over the top. not that it matters,by none of the things we are being told about this whole event do not add up and equal the gov story. just a bunch of small things which added together don't seem to fit. at the end of the day,gov account may be true. but,personally,i believed the 9/11 story for years. learned that was not a complete rendering or the truth. there are explanations given for everything i see wrong but added together they don't = the gov story.
gonna leave it there as it is what it is and arguing about it is pointless.
Quick, get this creep moved to the jail cell that Epstein was in. No one watches that feed. Hell, the guards take naps.
Remember, likely not even a real person. Just whoever has the shift at the Chinese troll farm. They win if you pay any attention.
Similar threads
