• Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Movie Theater Amazing Spiderman 2

chooter

A#1 BMF
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 4, 2010
722
48
Dayton, Ohio
Got bored and went to see this one today. Should have watched Neighbors.

2:20 hour movie that would have made a decent 1:45 hour movie. Interplay between the characters was weak, Hate Jamie Fox, Love Emma Stone.

Will not give any spoilers but this one may make a decent Netflix or redbox watch.

Off to watch Neighbors!
 
Saw this a while back and agree - not a movie to rush out to go see. It's definitely an average film with some good and some bad.
 
I'm confused as to why these are being redone so early. I mean it wasn't too long ago that Toby's series ended and honestly i thought those were good.

Well the Toby movies sucked so those don't count (nether do these ones though cus they suck too). I think it's like the Hulk series, where they just keep trying with different casts until one works and the dude in the avengers movie rocked the part after what? 2-3 tries with other guys..
 
I enjoyed it, though it was a bit of a mess.
I think Andrew Garfield does a pretty good job and they are staying closer to the source material.
I am not a big fan of Jamie Fox, though I think he is very talented. His character was pretty good, though they didn't flesh it out at all.

It suffers from one of the problems with spiderman 3. Too much going on and not building on the character of the bad guys, while dragging some stuff out.
While the flying nun does an OK Aunt May, Rosemary Harris was the perfect Aunt May.

I wasn't disappointed, but I would have been just as happy watching it on DVD.
 
I'm confused as to why these are being redone so early. I mean it wasn't too long ago that Toby's series ended and honestly i thought those were good.

This has been covered in the past but I'll lay it out again because the common narrative that Hollywood has lost its creativity is actually wrong.

The problem is that the six major film studios have become incredibly risk averse over the past 10 years or so. Movie making is an increasingly expensive gamble with no guarantee of profit. In fact, for every major hit that's highly profitable, there are often a dozen that don't even break even. On top of that, the DVD market utterly collapsed around 2010, which was their main source of long term profit. Because of this, the film studios have taken steps to reduce their financial exposure and a major part of that strategy has been to seek out corporate welfare in the form of tax subsidies and similar incentives. This race to the bottom by other States and countries like Canada & the UK has been a financial windfall for the studios, basically having taxpayers pick up the tab for up to a third of the upfront costs. And it's a race to the bottom because as soon as another State or country offers higher tax subsidies, the studios leave their current locations and start shooting in the new one. This is precisely why from 2000-2010, a lot of films (and TV) were shot in British Columbia, but over the last few years easily half of that work has moved to Montreal, which is offering a higher subsidy. The same goes for the UK, which has been destabilising the field since the advent of the "Harry Potter" films. To the point where not only do the film studios get an unheard of 35% tax break, but a significant portion of the salaries of local workers are covered by the tax payers. It's pretty much a pay for jobs situation and what none of them seem to realize is as soon as those subsidies go away or are exceeded somewhere else, the work will leave with it.

So is it any surprise that the studios have settled in to doing mostly sequels, remakes and franchise reboots? This is, again, hedging their bets as much as possible. If you want to see where creativity can really be explored and risks taken, then look no further than the premium networks like HBO, Showtime and AMC, for example. Is it any wonder why television lately is full of amazing shows while we get so many shit movies?
 
Last edited:
Well I actually remember this explanation. But I wasn't saying they lost their creativity. Spider-Man feels like it was yesterday. I get some of the remakes but this is within the same decade which is why I asked. And again I thought that the ones with Toby were good.

I mean I guess the same answer holds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk