• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Ever heard of LT COL Chris Schillings? What an embarrassment….

Sniperwannabee

CWO
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Feb 14, 2017
    5,948
    5,645
    Changes every 4 years
    Last fall, while accompanying her 7-year-old daughter to “Math Night” at her elementary school in North Hanover Township, New Jersey, Angela Reading was shocked to see what was on the school bulletin board in the hallway. It was filled with posters drawn by students and touting LGBTQ identities like androgyne, nonbinary, lesbian, gender-fluid, genderqueer, bi[sexual], pansexual, and polysexual.

    When her daughter asked her what “polysexual” meant, Angela decided to speak up. That night she posted on her personal Facebook page her objections to the sexual and gender content at school. She said that elementary-age students are too young for such subjects. She wrote that the content was “perverse and should be illegal.”

    Apparently, because families at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, a nearby military base, had children at the school, a base officer, Lt. Col. Christopher Schilling, posted on Facebook that Angela’s comments “caused safety concerns for many families.”

    Schilling contacted the local police chief who then asked Angela to remove her Facebook post. Angela said the police chief told her, “I don’t want Homeland Security coming after me. Take the post down.”

    Then Schilling posted that he was making sure federal security forces were “working with multiple state and local law enforcement agencies to monitor the situation to ensure the continued safety of the entire community.” He wasn’t exaggerating. Angela said she learned later that Schilling had reported her to the Department of Homeland Security.

    Things quickly spiraled out of control. Angela said she and her husband were ostracized and that she was characterized as a “terrorist” and “right-wing extremist.” They were both forced to resign as school board members. They had to pull their children out of public school.

    She also told the New York Post that she became the subject of multiple law enforcement investigations.

    Finally, Angela and her husband had had enough and contacted the Thomas More Society, a Chicago-based, not-for-profit, public interest law firm. The group is now representing them in a federal lawsuit that was filed in March.

    Christopher Ferrara, the couple’s attorney, summarized the chilling nature of the lawsuit.

    The core of this case is that a local police chief, acting at the request of military personnel at the Joint Base, obtained the removal of Mrs. Reading’s Facebook post, and then attempted to have other posts removed, after which Joint Base personnel engaged in a coordinated referral of Mrs. Reading to various law enforcement and security agencies. … This was accompanied by a campaign to portray Mrs. Reading as a security threat such that, as Defendant Schilling put it, “I think we need to keep the pressure on until her [Mrs. Reading’s] disruptive and dangerous actions cease…” – meaning, her fully protected speech with which the Defendants disagreed. This case exemplifies the weaponization of government against conservative parents. …
     

    “Angela said she learned later that Schilling had reported her to the Department of Homeland Security.”

    Interesting he wanted her reported her to DHS. Maybe he was hoping to ruin her “risk score.”
     
    Agency needs to be shut down ,they were suppose to get Islamic Terrorist trying to kill us. That seems to be over if they are going after parents trying to protect their children from the public school pedophile union. People have to take their children out of public schools along with their school tax dollars and find a normal private school.
     
    Military psyops gives out teddy bears and leaflets, despite what you may have seen on TV. They aren't a crack unit out there conducting mind altering experiments. That weird guy you met in that bar one time that told you what psyops is..... he's lying. The truth is really disappointing.
     
    Military psyops gives out teddy bears and leaflets, despite what you may have seen on TV. They aren't a crack unit out there conducting mind altering experiments. That weird guy you met in that bar one time that told you what psyops is..... he's lying. The truth is really disappointing.

    That sounds like what someone working on a military psyop would say
     
    Agency needs to be shut down ,they were suppose to get Islamic Terrorist trying to kill us. That seems to be over if they are going after parents trying to protect their children from the public school pedophile union. People have to take their children out of public schools along with their school tax dollars and find a normal private school.
    Sorry. It doesn't work that way. You can take your kids out of public schools and home school or private schools and pay for it separately but they are still going to take your tax dollars to fund the public schools.
    Although some places are giving tax credit for alternative schools it doesn't cover what they are taking in taxes.
    People need to investigate what the percentage of local budget is for schools. Then realize that about 75 % of their local taxes go to funding their indoctrination system.
     
    Public school funding is an absolute joke. If you ever dig deep you'll realize it's as corrupt as everything else.

    I'll try to keep this short, and by the way, this is all public information, so do the same experiment yourself if you'd like.

    About 5 years ago I was on Facebook, (I know, I know), and caught a teacher (hard-core liberal) giving a passionate argument to a group of associates about how underfunded schools are, and how they have to sell cookies to pay for tampons, or whatever..
     
    Part 2.

    So I began researching school funding. I quickly realized that the information is easy to find. I then realized that the county school system where I lived got over $9k/ year per student. But wait, there's more. They don't pay for their facilities out of that budget. They don't pay maintenence or upkeep either, different budget. Food/ cafeteria.. different budget. And then they get big grants from the federal government that vary buy year but are usually at least as much as half of the annual state funding. Then there are the donations and the endowments... and on and on.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bender
    Part 3.

    So, after realizing that in rural TN, school systems are pulling in $15k plus for each student each year, and all they are paying for is the teachers and administrators salaries, and a few other minor things, I had to know how much private schools cost. About 40 miles from me is a 5 star private school. The best of the best. The best teachers in the system. They graduate college grads. Like 99.6% graduation, 88% post graduation college acceptance. They also dominate in about every sport there is. This place essentially recruits high school athletes from the surrounding areas and bring them in. Their campus looks like a 200 acre fenced museum of horticulture. Every inch of it looks like a golf course. Modern architecture, everything is immaculate.

    At that time, their tuition ran around $8,500/ year, and with that money they take care of absolutely everything, and still have a president who is pulling down almost a half mil a year in salary.


    Like all things government, it isn't a funding issue.
     
    Part 2.

    So I began researching school funding. I quickly realized that the information is easy to find. I then realized that the county school system where I lived got over $9k/ year per student. But wait, there's more. They don't pay for their facilities out of that budget. They don't pay maintenence or upkeep either, different budget. Food/ cafeteria.. different budget. And then they get big grants from the federal government that vary buy year but are usually at least as much as half of the annual state funding. Then there are the donations and the endowments... and on and on.
    The fed gov pays by attendance. Remember when Obama regime changed how they reported attendance and kicking kids out of school?
    Now many school districts will fine and punish the parents for kids not attending the indoctrination system. It's definitely not because they care about the children.
     
    The fed gov pays by attendance. Remember when Obama regime changed how they reported attendance and kicking kids out of school?
    Now many school districts will fine and punish the parents for kids not attending the indoctrination system. It's definitely not because they care about the children.
    And that is hurting some of the school systems are parents pull kids out of the government schools for home schooling/private. Need to defund the government schools.
     
    If you compare today's funding with funding 20, 30, 40, 50 years ago even adjusted for inflation it's way over the top. Schools are pulling in 3-5x the money they were in the past, and they always want more.

    Do we have more teachers? No
    Do we pay more to attract higher skilled teachers? No
    What we have is more 'admin' who collect checks and do nothing of value in addition to setting up indoctrination of kids.

    Problem: if you cut the funding, they go for teachers and students first. They never go for the head of DEI or Curriculum coach.

    Just another sign of out decayed society and yearly raping of homeowners through property taxes.

    (And don't even get me started on the quality of the avg teacher)
     
    If you compare today's funding with funding 20, 30, 40, 50 years ago even adjusted for inflation it's way over the top. Schools are pulling in 3-5x the money they were in the past, and they always want more.

    Do we have more teachers? No
    Do we pay more to attract higher skilled teachers? No
    What we have is more 'admin' who collect checks and do nothing of value in addition to setting up indoctrination of kids.

    Problem: if you cut the funding, they go for teachers and students first. They never go for the head of DEI or Curriculum coach.

    Just another sign of out decayed society and yearly raping of homeowners through property taxes.

    (And don't even get me started on the quality of the avg teacher)
    Ok, we went deeper, so I'll play too.

    When I was a kid in the same school district, we had an administrator and his assistant. They occupied a shared office in town that was about 800 sq/f. He made a decent salary. That was it. Each school had a principal and an assistant principal.

    Fast forward 30 years and the student numbers are unchanged, but now they have 3 huge buildings, (all built new for this purpose, all multi-level), full of administration. There are people who have full time jobs as the "middle school girls basketball administrator". There are administrators for every major subject, coordinators for each sport at each school level for each gender, and other absolutely ridiculous bullshit. It's so bloated and inefficient that it's hard to believe. Each school now has a half dozen layers of principles too. Most of this appeared during the Obama administration.

    Meanwhile, test scores and graduation percentages have absolutely plummeted. They are losing more ground every year. They have infinitely more funding and admin support and they are worse at educating kids. But hey, don't forget to buy the cookies at the bake sale so the teachers can afford cleanex or whatever. It's bullshit.
     
    No, I was making a joke about the recent events with the titanic exploration. You posted this weeks ago.
    Okay. I got it now.

    Longshot Dont Get It.jpg
     
    Reading some this talk about how "schools work," must be like reading a liberal women's papers on how an M16 works.

    I know anyone who says the student numbers haven't changed in 30 years is just making up stories. How many SPED students did your district have 30 years ago. In our districts the SPED caseload has drastically increased over the last 3 years and is now over 500. 30 years ago SPED had around 30 kids in the 7 districts we serve. Not only have the numbers increased, but so have the requirements. In fact during the fake pandemic, while they were letting other school requirements slide. They made the SPED teachers show extra documentation, and raised their requirements.

    30 years ago, an SLP would write on a sticky note. "John Doe needs speech services" and it would begin. Now there are multiple meetings between specialists, psychologist, student and parents, an OT and the SLP before any services start. 30 years ago there was 1 SLP and 5 assistants to cover speech services. Now we have 4 in person SLPs and 1 online SLP. We need about 7 but can't hire enough because the colleges throttle the numbers they let into programs. We have about 14 assistants and para professionals that administer just speech services. This doesn't include the paras that perform services in schools every day, or the Occupational therapists of whom there are 5 with also with handful of assistants to perform daily therapy tasks.

    Our Autism numbers are through the roof we see about a 50% increase every year. Last year to this year was 150%. We have about 20 3 year olds right now that aren't talking at all yet. 2020 fake pandemic mask babies. We usually have 3-6. We have 3 more years of fake pandemic babies.

    Now adjust salaries for what a teachers pay was worth 30 years ago, and what a teacher had to do to maintain a teaching licenses 30 years ago. Thats not even getting into the gutting of para benefits for teachers over the last decade. At this point they would probably scrap it if it wasn't for all the judges and police on para retirement. The people getting in on now, would be better off with social security, but they need them to fund the old retirements still.

    There is lots of money wasted but how most people think it works isn't how it works.

    ITs funny how everyone wants more, but always seems to want everyone else to have less also.
     
    Reading some this talk about how "schools work," must be like reading a liberal women's papers on how an M16 works.

    I know anyone who says the student numbers haven't changed in 30 years is just making up stories. How many SPED students did your district have 30 years ago. In our districts the SPED caseload has drastically increased over the last 3 years and is now over 500. 30 years ago SPED had around 30 kids in the 7 districts we serve. Not only have the numbers increased, but so have the requirements. In fact during the fake pandemic, while they were letting other school requirements slide. They made the SPED teachers show extra documentation, and raised their requirements.

    30 years ago, an SLP would write on a sticky note. "John Doe needs speech services" and it would begin. Now there are multiple meetings between specialists, psychologist, student and parents, an OT and the SLP before any services start. 30 years ago there was 1 SLP and 5 assistants to cover speech services. Now we have 4 in person SLPs and 1 online SLP. We need about 7 but can't hire enough because the colleges throttle the numbers they let into programs. We have about 14 assistants and para professionals that administer just speech services. This doesn't include the paras that perform services in schools every day, or the Occupational therapists of whom there are 5 with also with handful of assistants to perform daily therapy tasks.

    Our Autism numbers are through the roof we see about a 50% increase every year. Last year to this year was 150%. We have about 20 3 year olds right now that aren't talking at all yet. 2020 fake pandemic mask babies. We usually have 3-6. We have 3 more years of fake pandemic babies.

    Now adjust salaries for what a teachers pay was worth 30 years ago, and what a teacher had to do to maintain a teaching licenses 30 years ago. Thats not even getting into the gutting of para benefits for teachers over the last decade. At this point they would probably scrap it if it wasn't for all the judges and police on para retirement. The people getting in on now, would be better off with social security, but they need them to fund the old retirements still.

    There is lots of money wasted but how most people think it works isn't how it works.

    ITs funny how everyone wants more, but always seems to want everyone else to have less also.
    So after reading your opening:

    "I know anyone who says the student numbers haven't changed in 30 years is just making up stories."

    Which was clearly aimed at me. I called the director of schools in the county I live in. He had to call me back about 10 minutes later because Monday mornings are very busy for him of course. I am doing an expansion for them at one of the older elementary schools in the county, so I clarified a couple of items and then asked him about student numbers over the last 30 years. His reply was that they were almost completely unchanged, until covid. During covid they had several hundred students pulled out to be homeschooled, and some of those have come back, but many of them didn't. Then, in the last two years, there have been an influx of out of state transfers, increasing the total by a couple hundred in a county of about 26k residents. So, in summary, it goes up a little and down a little, but it hasn't changed much. So.... kiss my ass. You don't know what you're talking about.
     
    Last edited:
    To go a step further, you said a whole bunch of shit in defense of the failed system that you are part of, and while you were explaining how much I didn't understand, you literally spelled out exactly what I described..

    You have significantly more staff and the quality of education has gotten worse and worse. Significant increases in funding, and the test scores, graduation rates and college entry rates have plummeted.

    You wrote a book to explain that I don't know what I'm talking about, and then validated every single point that I made.
     
    Took you two posts to prove you still have no idea what you are talking about. As well as proving you didn't understand what I wrote either.

    Graduation rates here go up and down but are relatively the same as always.

    What test scores? The standardized tests we use now that we didn't 30 years ago...

    College entry. 🤣🤣🤣
     
    Last edited:
    Took you two posts to prove you still have no idea what you are talking about. As well as proving you didn't understand what I wrote either.

    Graduation rates here go up and down but are relatively the same as always.

    What test scores? The standardized tests we use now that we didn't 30 years ago...

    College entry. 🤣🤣🤣
    You don't use ACT and SAT testing where you live? Way older than 30 years. Unless they stopped very recently, our kids are still taking them.

    If there is a point that you made that I don't seem to understand, please enlighten me with the smallest words you can muster. Alas, I am but a poor public school kid from the south. It's very likely I didn't grasp your point, so let's try again.
     
    You thought that was too much to read but want me to explain an extremely complex subject to you. 🤣🤣🤣

    Lets get this out of the way first.
    Your statement about graduation rates in TN are false. Tennessee set a record in 2017 with the highest graduation rate that state had ever seen at 88.5%. Last year the graduation rate in Tennessee was 89.1%.

    Not all students took the ACT and SAT historically. It would make sense for scores on those tests to go down when you start admistering that test to everyone. Especially special education kids who cost exponentially more per student.

    When I say the numbers aren't the same. I mean the SPED departments are packed. And total numbers are up. More kids more schools now than ever. Yes total costs are up.

    You clearly aren't afraid to make something up to support your position which makes everything you post suspect.

    To go a step further, you said a whole bunch of shit in defense of the failed system that you are part of, and while you were explaining how much I didn't understand, you literally spelled out exactly what I described..

    You have significantly more staff and the quality of education has gotten worse and worse. Significant increases in funding, and the test scores, graduation rates and college entry rates have plummeted.

    You wrote a book to explain that I don't know what I'm talking about, and then validated every single point that I made.
     
    Last edited:
    Questioning my integrity is ridiculous, but you've done it twice here. Academia is an absolute joke, and you're here defending the system that you're a part of. I will ask you one simple question, and I'll give you an answer format that you should be familiar with:

    Public Education system report card. (Rate your system honestly)

    1. Integrity
    2. Commitment
    3. Innovation
    4 . Effectiveness


    How do you think the American educator is doing in 2023?