Re: GIs wearing Sunglasses
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stefan73</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DP425</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boom2336</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I dont agree with that. Any time you step foot outside the wire or are on post you shouldhave eyepro on. Even if you dont catch primary frag from an IED there is a load of secondary frad moving at Mach Jesus. </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: partisan1911</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Not everyone has to wear eye pro 100% of the time- only the dumbass units require eye pro in areas that <span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">haven't seen effective indirect in months/years</span></span></span>. There is a time and place for safety measures... "
Sounds like some b.s. I was hearing from my turd CSM on his first deployment. That is the kind of complacent attitude that gets your boys hurt. </div></div>
See the bold/underlined words- I suppose by your thought process though, guys in Kosovo should be wearing IBA / IOTV... along with their eye-pro 24/7 as well. Some people (not saying it's you- you MAY have not been considering the words I emphasized here) need to use their OWN brain instead of just going unquestionably along with the "status-quo". I prefer to NOT be a mindless drone allowing the Army to do my thinking for me.
As I said before, there is a time and place for certain safety measures.
And I might have done better to say FOB's instead of areas- however, since they go by so many different terms now (FOB, COS, COP, ETC) I went with areas. I can see how that could lead one to believe I was speaking in respect to area's of A-Stan which haven't seen indirect in years... certainly not the case; IED's are more of a danger than indirect. But again- I didn't mention IED's because I'm speaking of FOB's. </div></div>
Makes me think about FOB Kalsu when I passed through there in April and a kid about 60 meters from the CHU I stayed at was killed by a 107mm.
Its all cool in shit holes if the bad guys inform you when they are going to shoot at you. I'm not so stressed out about on the COP or FOB. Kids should have what safety gear they can that allows them to be effective while still retaining the max amount of safety possible.
I'll tell you I've done some wazoooo shit. But that is my risk to take. </div></div>
Again- I just want to direct people to the emphasized text in my post- we're talking FOBS and what not that have a long standing history of no indirect.
I've been around both- if you get effective indirect daily... you should be wearing eye-pro (and everything else most likely). But on the other hand, if the FOB hasn't seen indirect, let alone effective indirect in a YEAR... Lets get real here... It's that illusive 5th principle that supposedly exists somewhere in the Army.