Huber Tactical vs CG Jackson Trigger

[Smokin]

Just read the writeup on Huber Tactical 2 stage triggers. It seems that the main competition for that trigger is the CG Jackson trigger. The Huber is a bit more expensive but doenst require gunsmithing. The CG Jackson will require inletting and adjusting. Anyone with some real world experience using the two?

 

[salmonaxe]

Re: Huber Tactical vs CG Jackson Trigger

I've got 2 CG's and I inletted my AICS with dremel, files and sandpaper in order to fit one. Besides that, I didn't have to do any real adjustment to the trigger itself.

Both of my CG's felt amazing out of the box. Once inletted, install is easier than a standard 700 trigger. Pulling a trigger pack for cleaning is super simple because of the clevis pin design. Safety is really nice engages solid and if I remember correctly blocks the trigger and the sear. (or it disengages the sear.) I really like the LOP adjustment. It's especially nice in the AICS since that seems to have a really short LOP from web of hand to trigger finger. (Compared to a standard Mcmillan or HS stock)

The only think I could see as being negative about the CG is that the method of attaching the trigger shoe allows it to rotate a bit even if fully tightened. So for tactical purposes it might not be as durable.

 

[bwgdog]

Re: Huber Tactical vs CG Jackson Trigger

The Model 22 is now available-Go on the website+click on the buy thingy for the 22 and the four models of the 22 come up-fixed shoe+adj+safety+bolt release. On the CG 22 looks like no cutting/fitting for bm ect needed-I hope-have one on the way.barry

 

[bwgdog]

Re: Huber Tactical vs CG Jackson Trigger

Sorry Guys-left out the inportant stuff-Tom Meyers www.x-tremeshooting.com is his web site. barry

 

[C.K]

Re: Huber Tactical vs CG Jackson Trigger

Both are good triggers on a field gun I would recommend Hubers. I'v had one jackson foul up so far.