To those of you who are scoffing at the those who are raising concerns over Nicholas Irving's legitimacy, you should know, that I am here right now because I am former military myself and believe Nicholas could potentially be a fraud. He says sh*t about war that just doesn't happen or is false af, and the more I heard the more I had to look into him. For instance, he once said he used an enemy AK-47 in Afghanistan. That is next to f*cking impossible, especially for a sniper who's already engaging way too far away to ever pick up an enemy AK. I understand he has been a gunner and grenadier before too, but so have I. The Taliban engages at long distances. BDA's are needed to confirm kills because we almost never know if we hit them, save for troops with higher power scopes, but even they have doubts when they score kills. Something about this dude isn't adding up. He's either a pathological liar, or a fraud (many pathological liars join the military trust me). He could be either, yes. But if he's a fraud, you'll never be able to prove it. I guarantee he has his sh*t covered if you ever look into it. Some of you may know what I am referring to (look at his callsign).
The bottom line, at the very least, is that Nicholas Irving is VERY suspect. And now you actually have a combat vet, who served in the same war he did, arriving here trying to find answers. You do the math.
deploy more and type less.
