• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

M40a1 build guide

I think any and all of the A1s regardless of action are really cool, I personally prefer the C letter action as my favorite Remgton action ever made for deer/elk/varmint etc so it also be my choice for an A1 build even though only 100 of them were used. Correct me if I'm wrong but I take it that the Cs were aquired post Desert Storm since Desert storm was in Jan/Feb of 91. Again correct me if wrong but any rifles used during Desert storm woulda been with six dig mostly and some 7 dig (PIP) rifles? Army units probably had a number of C letter 24s in DS but the 40s woulda been older actions is my point.
To Marty's impressive collection I bought one of his Calenders he sold(2007/2008) great large photos of historical beauties! Very sexy Parker M85(my other fav along with M40) as well as No4T and M70 sniper! He has much more than was in the calender pages!

rlm8541 said:
A batch of C series actions were purchased in 1991 to augment what was needed at the time. I believe that E series (along with some seven digits, which Im assuming were carried over from a few of the A1's) receivers are production dated in the early 2000's and were used on the early A3's (with the Unertl 10X transfers prior to the S&B's) preceding the G's that were used on the A5's productions.
Click to expand...
 
Thanks SD for the clarification on the 99 C letter actions being fiscal 1992 purchase for building into A1 rifles(per Peter Senich's book).
I have that book as well and was remembering that(therefore post Desert Storm) but wanted to be certain. I guess I coulda dug the book out and read it again rather than be lazy and take up time here.
Thanks!
 
scatsob said:
I apologize for being dense, and I swear I have read through the thread, but a 7 digit would be technically correct for an A1 build?
Click to expand...

As I understand, yes but in very few numbers... We dont have a serial number range so...

MescaBug said:
Need a quick answer.. No time to read the whole 26 pages of the thread.

Outside the first batch of 6-digit and some C,E,G receivers added later, anybody knows if 7-digits were used?

7-digits as in a 1975 receiver serialed 68XXXXX?
Click to expand...

M40_A1 said:
98% sure- no.
(I've learned never to say "never" when it comes to the M40A1)
Click to expand...

rlm8541 said:
Mesca....100% yes on the "seven" digit SN for the VN era M700.....There were very few and were late production and were refered to as the "Product Improvement Series". Senich talks about them on page 162 of his book "one Round War".
I actually know a gentlemen who has one of these rifles....It was originally released from WTB Quantico as a Trophy Rifle. It has the Satin black Redfield and the rounded corner later gen. Redfield base. The last four are etched on the scope.
I have pics burried somewhere. I think another member actaully has some posted on here somewhere.

I have seen where they were actually used on some of the early A3's so Im assuming that somewhere down the line it had been used on an A1. Like I said, I would assume. But I personally haven't seen any A1's with them....which really doesn't amount to much...lol
Click to expand...
 
Bought an M40A1 spec build last week. Supposed to ship today. Seller has packed with action removed from stock.

Its probably mentioned here but there are a lot of pages to search through, if readily available please, what is the torque spec for the action screws and what is the hex dimension/allen size?

The rifle is coming with a build book. Do armorers record a torque used and will each rifle have its own setting? Are these rifles like 03's, can you tune accuracy by playing with the torque on the action screws?

During assembly anything to concern myself with to ensure the integrity of the bedding?

Thank you for your patience with a M40A1 newb.
 
pmclaine said:
Bought an M40A1 spec build last week. Supposed to ship today. Seller has packed with action removed from stock.

Its probably mentioned here but there are a lot of pages to search through, if readily available please, what is the torque spec for the action screws and what is the hex dimension/allen size?

The rifle is coming with a build book. Do armorers record a torque used and will each rifle have its own setting? Are these rifles like 03's, can you tune accuracy by playing with the torque on the action screws?

During assembly anything to concern myself with to ensure the integrity of the bedding?

Thank you for your patience with a M40A1 newb.
Click to expand...

McMillan recommends 40-45 inch lbs. I wouldnt go pass 45 with a fiberglass stock.

HS Precision stocks with aluminum bedding block is 65 inch lbs. As per the Remington M24 owner's manual.
 
MescaBug said:
McMillan recommends 40-45 inch lbs. I wouldnt go pass 45 with a fiberglass stock.

HS Precision stocks with aluminum bedding block is 65 inch lbs. As per the Remington M24 owner's manual.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Standard McMillan HTG Ill assume 40-45. inch lbs.

scatsob said:
If it comes with the build papers it will have the torque spec written down. My A3 is 60 in-lbs.
Click to expand...

Thank you. After I make my assumption above I will check the build book and go with what the armorer originally did.
 
pmclaine said:
Bought an M40A1 spec build last week....what is the torque spec for the action screws and what is the hex dimension/allen size?
Click to expand...

Usually 60-65 in.lbs.
3/16" hex.


pmclaine said:
The rifle is coming with a build book. Do armorers record a torque used and will each rifle have its own setting?
Click to expand...

Yes. Should be stated in the tube data book.

Congrats on your purchase!
 
Two years ago when I received my gap m40 a1, I emailed ken and asked him the recommended torque he wrote back 40-45 in/lb.
 
Last edited:
Althought it is specified in the tube date book (not trying to refute this fact), I wouldnt go past 45 on mine... It is already awfully tight. No pillars on these stocks, 65 in.lbs. sounds like a lot directly on fiberglass.
 
I saw the thread specifically inquiring about the tourque value to use with McMillan stocks (A5 not HTG) and the post about starting low and stopping at best group makes sense.

I had written info concerning tightening 03 screws to that same 65 inch pounds and that is a lot of pressure. Other reputable builders recommend 35-40 on the old wood rifles. The wood 1903 rifles also have to deal with 10 pounds of up pressure at the front of the stock.

Im assuming M40A1's float along the entire length of the barrel.

Ill look at the tube data book to see where the builder was at and probably start some percent under that.

Thank you for your time taken to answer.
 
Last edited:
I have another M40A1 question I've been meaning to ask...

When prone behind my M40A1 with the scope all the way back in the rings, I have a heck of a time getting a full sight picture when trying to lie straight behind the rifle. I have to angle my body to get my head forward far enough to obtain the full field of view in the Unertl. AND, my stock is short by 3/8" from the standard 13 1/2" LOP (long story). I would imagine a full 13 1/2" LOP stock would be even worse.

Does anyone else experience this? The scope really doesn't have much travel to play with. I never thought I had a stubby neck. LOL.
 
Last edited:
Hey M40A1.....Proper Cheekweld/Stockweld, whichever you prefer to call it, has been an issue with the A1 since its inception....Since the A1 has no adjustable cheek comb and everyone's head shape (mine being size "Fat"), neck, and cheek bone height is different, getting the proper eye relief and cheek/stock weld (the relationship of the cheek against the stock in order to obtain proper alinment of the eye directly behind the scope) alignment can be more difficult for some than others....If you look at pictures of many/most Marine Snipers in most of the publications you will find that it was common for us to slice thin pieces of Iso mat (the green foam sleeping mat the we were issued... approx. 1"X 6"/8" in length) and lay them across the top of the stock and wrap it in Riggors tape (duck tape). We would stack and tape these as needed until we had gotten the proper height to take the crick out of our necks and allow us to obtain the proper stockweld.
Regardless of where the Unertl rests in the rings it is designed to have an eye relief of approx. 3" to 3 1/2".
It was a crude way of making things work but....it did work...lol
So,...getting your cheek up off the stock a little "should" help you get the proper stock weld and eye relief.
See if that may help.
 
rlm8541 said:
Hey M40A1.....Proper Cheekweld/Stockweld, whichever you prefer to call it,...
Click to expand...

LOL! More like "chinweld" on the M40A1 :)

Thanks. I know what you mean about building up a pad. I've thought about doing that, but had two reservations.
1) It would force the bottom of the face more to the left, preventing a good, vertical head placement, and
2) I was wondering if there was a way to build it that wouldn't prevent bolt removal for cleaning.

The first Redfield system could be extended more rearward in the rings, allowing for versatile eye relief adjustment and bolt manipulation without losing stockweld. Not so with the Unertl/M40A1. Anyway, it's more that forward placement to get the full field of view that I find difficult to achieve without some neck strain on these. So was wondering if others have/had the same problem.
 
Last edited:
Was speaking from experience....guess i shuld have been a little more descriptive...You dont build the piece by making it wider...you go up with it...Trust me I will relieve nearly 80% of neck tension ...Ive done this with dozens of students and with this it will then be able to get the right amount of eye relief.....Trust me when I tell you that you are not the first person to have this problem...lolololol
Second.....you start the build of the cheek piece by pulling the bolt to the rear then marking and building from there or you trim it....Its not an attractive fix but it works and unless you can figure out some other way of making it work that hasnt been tried by 1000's of snipers you dont have to many other choices......If you do find one, you will have suprised Marine Snipers by the 1000's from over 3/12 decades....Good luck! Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. I will leave this alone from here. Just trying to help.
M40_A1 said:
LOL! More like "chinweld" on the M40A1 :)

Thanks. I know what you mean about building up a pad. I've though about doing that, but had two reservations.
1) It would force the bottom of the face more to the left, preventing a good, vertical head placement, and
2) I was wondering if there was a way to build it that wouldn't prevent bolt removal for cleaning.

The first Redfield system could be extended more rearward in the rings, allowing for versatile eye relief adjustment and bolt manipulation without losing stockweld. Not so with the Unertl/M40A1. Anyway, it's more that forward placement to get the full field of view that I find difficult to achieve without some neck strain on these. So was wondering if others have/had the same problem.
Click to expand...
 
rlm8541 said:
Just trying to help.
Click to expand...

As usual, rlm, you're a great help. In fact, I finally get it (I think). I always thought the pad was laid on the left side of the stock and left sticking up past the top to "raise" the comb. But now I understand that narrow strips are laid along the top of the comb to raise it, hence the 1" wide strips. I hope that's right. Makes sense now. Thank you! Now to give it a try. I don't want to sacrifice my sleeping mat, so I'll hit the surplus store to see what they have. Also, I think I understand how having a larger surface area against which to rest your cheek could help relieve muscle tension from having to hold the head forward. And Roger on keeping the strips back far enough for bolt clearance.
 
Yep, you got it...Just lay the thin strips across the top. Tape each individual separately and tight to the stock, that way you dont end up with the problem of the rest folding over once you put pressure against it. Have found in the past that most only need two sometimes three layers max. in order to get the right height.....
If your not in a hurry....I will be back in the states in about three weeks and i can send you plenty of Iso mat....I have two extra's mat's for just this purpose....This is not just a problem with the A1...There are many stocks out there that people use that end up having this issue when setting them up. So I keep plenty on hand.

M40_A1 said:
As usual, rlm, you're a great help. In fact, I finally get it (I think). I always thought the pad was laid on the left side of the stock and left sticking up past the top to "raise" the comb. But now I understand that narrow strips are laid along the top of the comb to raise it, hence the 1" wide strips. I hope that's right. Makes sense now. Thank you! Now to give it a try. I don't want to sacrifice my sleeping mat, so I'll hit the surplus store to see what they have. Also, I think I understand how having a larger surface area against which to rest your cheek could help relieve muscle tension from having to hold the head forward. And Roger on keeping the strips back far enough for bolt clearance.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
1_zps7fbb0a10.jpg
2_zps849a293f.jpg
6_zps052be5e8.jpg
 
Last edited:
latinaincovina said:
60 inch lbs. OMG ... I so wish i had kept that rifle!
Click to expand...

I'd be sad also but Im sure you had good reasons to let it go. I told you if I ever get in a situation where I have to sell you get first right of refusal. USPS screwed up and sent it to the wrong town - WTF!. Should be arriving today, trying to make arrangements for signing on delivery/FFL. Mail to you to follow after delivery.

I dont doubt the 60 inch pound spec but agree with others seems tight. My other rifles with slotted screws its impossible to get that tourqe as the tool wont stay in the screw head. The allens will make that tourqe achievable but I almost think the spec should be "get it as tight as you can but dont be a dummy and strip the screws or crush your stock".

Have you ever came across the 2112 books I asked about above? Never saw them before but than again Ive never been as interested in M40 stuff as I have the last few weeks. Should be good reference for maintaining the rifle. No idea what their value should be just jumped as they were available. I dont see myself owning an A3/A5, Barrett or DMR maybe others would be interested in those.

Pics of rifle to follow soon. I imagine they should get people filling your PM mailbox for same.
 
Last edited:
latinaincovina said:
I dont know if you are getting PMs so I'm going to post it here. If you dont intend to keep that rifle dont open the box it was shipped in. Just send it right back to me and i will refund your $$$ plus shipping.
Click to expand...

Yep, All PMs are coming and I have notification there is one from you in my PM area right now. I do not intend on getting rid of a PWS built rifle and I thank you for making the chance to buy available to the board.

My latest tracking shows its out for delivery in my town. Its an odd manner of shipping and Ill have to get it to the right location to complete the paperwork. The paperwork I sent you was supposed to be signed and you would have shipped to that party.

Ill be posting pics soon as Im sure the board will be interested and it will help their research on what to look for when doing their own clones or when buying similar.
 
New to me M40A1

Seller packed exceedingly well. Substantial box and absolutely no shake before opening. Not even the USPS sending it to the wrong town was going to be an issue.



 
Last edited:
Stock







Barreled action.

Odd the magazine is not welded to the receiver. Its a G code action. In this configuration am I correct to think I have an easy option to go to M40A3 if I want?



 
Last edited:
How does PWS darken the shroud?



Rifle





Trigger is nice and crisp





Couldn't get a good clear picture of the crown. Its the straight wall style, no 45 chamfer down to the bottom of the dish.

The flat bluing on these things is dynamite. It should wear well and take on a nice salty, worn in look as the surface smoothes out.
 
Last edited:
No the A1 is clip slotted and the A3s are Lug slotted. So no is the answer on the A1 to A3 change out. There is are 2 scallop cuts on the clip slotted actions and no scallop cut on the A3 lug slot. It is completely different.

pmclaine said:
Stock







Barreled action.

Odd the magazine is not welded to the receiver. Its a G code action. In this configuration am I correct to think I have an easy option to go to M40A3 if I want?



Click to expand...
 
TWOMANATTACK said:
No the A1 is clip slotted and the A3s are Lug slotted. So no is the answer on the A1 to A3 change out. There is are 2 scallop cuts on the clip slotted actions and no scallop cut on the A3 lug slot. It is completely different.
Click to expand...
The barrel bracket would be incorrect as well. Although some A1 actions were re-used on A3's and I've heard rumor that there is at least 1-6 digit A5.
 
I have no desire for an A3/A5 (Ive said stupid shit like that before than when I find myself pulling out the wallet I always wonder "How did I get here"). My thoughts were only generated by the "G" SN and the mag box on the A1 not being welded to the receiver - a conversion possibility up to the point my mount cuts would not be correct. To me, the A1, despite its old tech/lack of modern ergonomics, is predatory function in its purest form.

Im buying some 2112 books off a party that has fielded all three versions of the rifle. His experience is that there is little uniformity in the rifles - different style safeties, bolt releases in different locations, magazine box welds cut loose/not done at all to improve accuracy, builders stamps that vary in font size, location done and varying concern with whether the stamps were "neat" or not.

I havent anywhere near the knowledge of others but probably the more perfect the build the less like a Fleet rifle it is....but that recent PWS A3 build thread certainly shows an about absolutely perfectly done rifle. That "German Gothic" number stenciling in the barrel channel of the stock is sweet.
 
Last edited:
Nice gun! We see all kinds of things on M40A1 clones. Some are correct, some are not. I wouldnt pay too much attention to the little details.. Looks like this one was put together nicely!
 
Very cool !!

Subbing to this thread for more M40A1 porn.:cool:
 
I had heard that slotting done in-house at Quantico was lug slotting (without the half-moon divot cuts), even on the A1s (C and E actions). Does anyone know for certain if this is true/untrue?
 
Leo Conring did my M40A1 build. That's how he did mine, and he said all the ones that he built at Quantico were done that way.
 
i am going to do another run of M40A1 USMC sniper rifle scope bases. Same deal as the last batch. $415 shipped. If you want them with black oxide add $25 as I have to ship them out to be done. EMAIL me ... I am not able to check PMs much, however I do check email almost every day.
ajqi38.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well there was a smear stock on EBay a couple of weeks back inletted for a 40x action.
From memory it wasn't inletted for bottom metal though.
 
MescaBug said:
The McMillans started building rifles and stock in 73. Mostly army contracts and for benchrest shooters. I dont know when the M40A1 HTG stock became available to the general public.

Out of curiosity, what do you want to know exactly? ;)

McMillan Story
Click to expand...

I would like the to know the odds of being able to find a smear or similar pattern stock for a short action Remington without paying the premium for an actual M40A1 stock.
 
pre64marksman said:
Holy HE$% no one bid?????
The person who hacked Ebay probably did so in order to get that stock!
Click to expand...

It was a civilian stock for a single-shot 40x, needed inletting, had a hairline crack in the forestock, needed the recoil pad replaced. The only thing it had going for it was the semi-smear pattern. Still, I'm surprised it didn't sell at that price for the pattern alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
USMCSGT0331 newbies guide to building a M40
Replies
56
Views
3K
ArtofStealth
A
USMCSGT0331
  • Sticky
Need help deciding M40A1 build configurations
Replies
85
Views
9K
TorF
T
baker72
Firearms WTS USMC Propert 40X 22LR, M40,M40A1, M70 with Unertl scope,Barrett MRAD MK22 Socom trials rifle. SEI Crazy Horse M14.
Replies
8
Views
2K
baker72
baker72
USMCSGT0331
A thread with links to suitable donor rifles?
Replies
5
Views
375
RIGREG
R
N
New Guy From Mn
Replies
9
Views
136
Natetron
N
Top Bottom
Back