Marc's Weaponized Math

lowlight

HMFIC of this Shit
Staff member
Online Training Access
Apr 12, 2001
30,760
16,302
219
Base of the Rockies
www.snipershide.com
Here is the link to the article on the Math we discussed in the Podcast from Alaska


Weaponized Math Article

Take my 6.5, for instance, at my home range: 8.7 at 1,000 minus 5.8 at 800 equals 2.9 Mils of drop in that 200-yard gap. If I take that 2.9 and multiply it by .45, it gives me 1.3 Mils. Add that to my 800-yard data of 5.8 and it gives me... guess what...? What my TRASOL spits out for my 900-yard data!


8.7-5.8 = 2.9.


2.9 x .45 = 1.3


5.8 + 1.3 = 7.1 Mils


7.1 Mils to a water-line hit


This was great. Problem solved at 900 from now on, and it saved student ammo and instructor aggravation. I could now concentrate on the student’s wind call knowing that the data I gave him was elevation-correct, minus his input and windage. And it works in MOA or Mil, of course. I had created voodoo.
 
Last edited:

Skookum

Jack Booted Thug...Crushing the American Dream
Belligerents
May 6, 2017
2,347
2,999
219
Interesting approach, I'm making note of these factors for future reference.
 
Last edited:

A&8's

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Mar 20, 2019
405
263
69
Good read. Gonna sit down later this eve and compare cals to math DOPE.
 

TacticalDillhole

Shiner of shoes
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Jun 26, 2012
5,156
5,000
219
N. Carolina
Here is the link to the article on the Math we discussed in the Podcast from Alaska


Weaponized Math Article

Take my 6.5, for instance, at my home range: 8.7 at 1,000 minus 5.8 at 800 equals 2.9 Mils of drop in that 200-yard gap. If I take that 2.9 and multiply it by .45, it gives me 1.3 Mils. Add that to my 800-yard data of 5.8 and it gives me... guess what...? What my TRASOL spits out for my 900-yard data!


8.7-5.8 = 2.9.


2.9 x .45 = 1.3


5.8 + 1.3 = 7.1 Mils


7.1 Mils to a water-line hit


This was great. Problem solved at 900 from now on, and it saved student ammo and instructor aggravation. I could now concentrate on the student’s wind call knowing that the data I gave him was elevation-correct, minus his input and windage. And it works in MOA or Mil, of course. I had created voodoo.
still wont help you on a plate at 300 though Frank
 

Timetoshoot

Bullet driver
Belligerents
May 7, 2013
271
94
34
Carbondale
Trying to simplify my work flow at matches I’ve gone back ti using paper dope sheets with 50yard intervals. This works for finding shots between my data points. 147 eldm @ 2740
1000 to 1500 I’ve been using .4
500 to 1000 I’ve been using .45
And inside 500 I’ve been using .5

I seldom miss due to elevation on 2 moa or bigger. Oh I definitely miss my fair share R&L.!!
 

slayer 2c

Sergeant
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Jan 18, 2011
454
243
49
Lost.........
Thank you for this Math, really helps with friends at the range!!!!

Question and I apologize in advance if its been asked before, I see a high speed number and a low speed number, but both of these numbers are no where near my numbers for fps. Any idea on how speed effects the results. I see tweaking and I know its just to get on steel I'm not looking for centered hits. But 6.5 for example is only running 2650's I got to assume that's gonna through off the math!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enough Said

lowlight

HMFIC of this Shit
Staff member
Online Training Access
Apr 12, 2001
30,760
16,302
219
Base of the Rockies
www.snipershide.com
we see more variation in the shooter than the MV.

This is from the data we record from the class and their shooters, we monitor their dope

You can always plus and minus it a touch if you need it to line up too a different speed.
 

Dthomas3523

Hall Monitor
Staff member
Hessian
Commercial Supporter
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Jan 31, 2018
7,556
8,571
119
South Texas
Have a buddy coming out to shoot this week. He just a hunter with no real “math” experience when it comes to shooting.

I had @JC Steel build a truing target like the one Frank has posted.

Gonna start at 300 and work back in 100yd increments and use this method to get his dope for his 6.5.

8F86DC64-4525-4C61-BF33-7DE2228F6EA2.jpeg
 

Rearden Steel

Banhammer
Banned !
Minuteman
Feb 17, 2019
28
17
6
Have a buddy coming out to shoot this week. He just a hunter with no real “math” experience when it comes to shooting.

I had @JC Steel build a truing target like the one Frank has posted.

Gonna start at 300 and work back in 100yd increments and use this method to get his dope for his 6.5.

View attachment 7135866
How far are you working back with Marc’s method?
 
Last edited:

slayer 2c

Sergeant
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Jan 18, 2011
454
243
49
Lost.........
I used Mark's math over the weekend for a friends brand new AI in 6.5. It was spot on out to 600 yards. We started at 300 with 1.0mil had 10" steel circle at 400 and the math put him on it first shot. A minor adjustment to center line and some quick math put him on the plate at 500 with the first shot again. Again a quick adjustment to center line and some more math and solid hit at 600. All in all we had good data for that rifle within 1 box of ammo. Not only was it easy and effective it was a cost savings as well!!!!!

This is a great tool.....I've copied all the numbers and put it into my data book to use later. I know its just a matter of time until I go looking for it again.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Enough Said

lowlight

HMFIC of this Shit
Staff member
Online Training Access
Apr 12, 2001
30,760
16,302
219
Base of the Rockies
www.snipershide.com
200 is a pretty standard value,

if you cannot hit 200, time to get a new hobby.

.5 Mils is the basic, 2 MOA with just about any caliber, the fine tune will be for location and MV

But you should be within an inch of 200 just using 2 MOA
 

MP2Day

Private
Minuteman
Oct 8, 2019
8
4
6
Denver area
  • Like
Reactions: Enough Said

Skookum

Jack Booted Thug...Crushing the American Dream
Belligerents
May 6, 2017
2,347
2,999
219
@lowlight

In another thread you posted your weaponized math work sheet. Could you please post it either here, or in "Resources" to make it easy to find?

Edit: Nevermind, found it.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ruebarb

Ratchety

Online Training Member
Online Training Access
Minuteman
Feb 1, 2019
13
5
6
Gents, I am curious how the weaponized math might apply to meters. I could directly translate 600yds to 548m, 700yds etc, otherwise I don't see the percentages lining up correctly.... What says you?
 

TacticalDillhole

Shiner of shoes
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Jun 26, 2012
5,156
5,000
219
N. Carolina
Gents, I am curious how the weaponized math might apply to meters. I could directly translate 600yds to 548m, 700yds etc, otherwise I don't see the percentages lining up correctly.... What says you?
Just replace yds for m. It’s not a perfect science, it’s to get you very close and then true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ratchety

Enough Said

Staff Sergeant Taylor
Staff member
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Apr 10, 2005
532
200
49
Anchorage, AK
METERS -
Just found this post.
I'm betting that if you add 9% of each factor to that factor, it will put you near center plate.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Didn't do the math, Just figuring that's gonna be close.
Taylor
 

Tylerm713

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Jan 28, 2020
121
71
34
Houston, TX
For us simpletons, I'm guessing this would also work in MOA? If so, I created the attached table to convert everything over, if someone wants to check my work. Each cell won't match exactly to the Mil table, but I used a middle benchmark row and worked back from there.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: Enough Said

Tylerm713

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Jan 28, 2020
121
71
34
Houston, TX
Correct,

Mils or MOA does not matter, both can be interchanged using 3.43
Cool, I'll put this table to work then (instead of carrying the mil table and needing to convert each one on the fly). Hope this helps anyone that's using MOA instead of mils.