Re: Officer was justified in punching teen
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Subsonic308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Comming to your area soon.... The Carbon Cop's to save the planet. Reason for punching someone in the face next time? Lights on after dark? Burning wood in you stove on a no burn day? The control grid is closing in fast... Welcome to America home of the free? Land of the slave.
It's nice we go around the world to give others freedom. But what type of a Constitution did we set up in Iraq? U.S. style? Nope. UN/Soviet type! Why? Not sure. Are they too dumb to have freedom? Go walk around a Walmart and you will understand why presidents of the world agree we need a New Order to control the world. Even U.S. Presidents including both Bush's and Obama called out for this.
Why the rant? I fear for the Republic with all the control hungry people ready to save us from Anarchy. The Founding fathers are rolling over in there graves.
Freedom involves risk and as the weak people of our nation call out for safety, <span style="font-weight: bold">freedom</span> will be the price for are safety.
"The Constitution is just a god damn piece of paper."
Bush 41 (And this was the good guy!)
Henry Kissinger (still in the power structure) about the LA riots:
"Today, America would be outraged if <span style="text-decoration: underline">UN troops </span>entered Los Angeles to restore order. <span style="font-weight: bold">Tomorrow they will be grateful!</span> This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, <span style="font-weight: bold">whether real or promulgated</span>, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government." </div></div>
This, right here, is why this country is failing to maintain its status as a world leader. This gentleman can't even recognize the difference between the words you and your, there and their, or are and our. Yet he is content that he commands a firm grasp on world politics (and how they are being used to steal his freedom). As well as his certainty that most other people are not up to the intellectual task of analyzing a situation, and determining if it warrants his particular brand of paranoia.
Not every incident is an indication of our "impending" slavery, or the downfall of our constitutional republic. A jaywalking statute no more impedes liberty than a stop sign. If not for these legal guidelines, one would spend hours trying to reach a destination a few miles away. For without the statutes, speed limits would be lowered to account for the random idiot who crosses the road with a complete disregard for oncoming traffic. These rules were not put in place to imprison you, but to assign responsibility in the event of tragedy. In an ideal world, the reason the police issue you a citation is to remind you (in a way that saying "don't do that" wont) that you have risked your life/property and that of others, in exchange for minor convenience.
If you are utilizing a public road, whether by foot or conveyance, you are subject to the rules of traffic. These roads were not built with "your" tax dollars, but with "ours". Thus "you" don't get to decide which rules should apply; it is a collective decision by a collective of property owners. If a large enough group feels that the rules are faulty, they are free to organize a ballot measure to have the statute amended. But, that would require more effort than sitting back and selfishly complaining about your entitlement to "freedom".
Perhaps you should stop complaining, and arm yourself with the information needed to realize your vision of how this country should be. At that point, you would move away from the society destroying mechanism of entitlement; and on to the concept of work = reward.
I had no intention of picking on you specifically Subsonic. Yours was merely the latest post that demonstrated the characteristics I was admonishing. You were caught in the cross-hairs, so to speak.